Brexit and the dependence structure among the G7 bank equity markets
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.17(2).2020.18
-
Article InfoVolume 17 2020, Issue #2, pp. 231-239
- Cited by
- 668 Views
-
96 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
The UK referendum in June 2016 on leaving the European Union had a negative impact on banking stocks across the major financial markets. This has left with a question dealing with the effect of UK banking institutions on the systemic risk on a global scale. This paper aims at investigating the changes in the dependence structure between the UK bank equity returns and its counterparts in the G7 economies. The methodology used is based on the GJR-GARCH volatility spillover model that accounts for asymmetry and leverage, and copula for the time-varying correlation structure among G7 banks. Taking the data on bank equity return indices for G7 economies, the results indicate the symmetric dependence structure between the UK and Italian banks and the asymmetric dependence between the UK and the rest of G7 banks. This is due to the simultaneous decline in bank shares prices across the Union. Such results are important constituents for cross-country portfolio diversification.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)G21, C58
-
References25
-
Tables4
-
Figures1
-
- Figure 1. Time-varying dependence of best copula fits between G7 and UK bank equity returns
-
- Table 1. Descriptive statistics for returns on bank equity indices
- Table 2. Marginal distribution estimates
- Table 3. Time-varying dependence estimates
- Table 4. Dependence structure before and after the Brexit referendum
-
- Ang, A., & Bekaert, G. (2002). International Asset Allocation with Regime Shifts. The Review of Financial Studies, 15(4), 1137-1187.
- Barone-Adesi, G., Giannopoulos, K., & Vosper, L. (2018). Estimating the joint tail risk under the filtered historical simulation. An application to the CCP’s default and waterfall fund. European Journal of Finance, 24(5), 413-425.
- Brechmann, E. C., Hendrich, K., & Czado, C. (2013). Conditional copula simulation for systemic risk stress testing. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 53, 722-732.
- Burdekin, R., Hugson, E., & Gu, J. (2018). A first look at Brexit and Global Equity Markets. Applied Economic Letters, 25, 136-140.
- Caporale, G. M., Gil-Alana, L., & Trani, T. (2018). Brexit and Uncertainty in Financial Markets. International Journal of Financial Studies, 6, 21.
- Cherubini, U., & Vecchiato, W. (2004). Copula Methods in Finance. England: John Wiley & Sons.
- Cumming, F., & Noss, J. (2013). Assessing the adequacy of CCPs’ default resources (Bank of England Financial Stability Paper No. 26).
- Das, S. R., & Uppal, R. (2004). Systemic Risk and International Portfolio Choice. The Journal of Finance, 59(6), 2809-2834.
- Embrechts, P., McNeil, A., & Straumann, D. (2001). Correlation and dependency in risk management: Properties and pitfalls. In M. Dempster et al. (Eds.), Risk Management: Value at Risk and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Fengler, Matthias R., & Ostap Okhrin. (2016). Managing risk with a realized copula parameter. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 100, 131-152.
- Hauksson, H. A., Dacorogna, M., Domenig, T., Mller, T., & Samorodnitsky, G. (2010). Multivariate extremes, aggregation and risk estimation. Quantitative Finance, 1(1), 79-95.
- Ji, Q., Liu, B., Cunado, J., & Gupta, R. (2018). Risk spillover between the US and the remaining G7 stock markets using time-varying copulas with Markov switching: Evidence from over a century of data. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 51, 100846.
- Kerkhof, J., Melenberg, B., & Schumacher, H. (2010). Model risk and capital reserves. Journal of Banking and Finance, 34(1), 267-279.
- Kierzenkowski, R., Pain, N., Rusticelli, E., & Zwart, S. (2016). The economic consequences of Brexit: A taxing decision.
- Kole, E., Koedijk, K., & Verbeek, M. (2007). Selecting copulas for risk management. Journal of Banking and Finance, 31, 2405-2423.
- Krupskii, P., & Harry, J. (2013). Factor copula models for multivariate data. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 120, 85-101.
- Kurecic, P., & Kokotovic, F. (2018). Empirical analysis of the impact of Brexit referendum and post-referendum events on selected stock exchange indices. South East European Journal of Economics and Business, 13, 7-16.
- Li, D. X. (2000). On default correlation: A copula function approach. The Journal of Fixed Income, 9(4), 43-54.
- Manner, H., & Reznikova, O. (2012). A survey of time-varying copulas: specification, simulations, and application. Econometric Reviews, 31(6), 654-687.
- McNeil, A. J. (1999). Extreme value theory for risk managers. In Internal Modelling and CAD II (pp. 93-113). RISK Books.
- Palaro, P. H., & Hotta, L. K. (2006). Using conditional copula to estimate Value at Risk. Journal of Data Science, 4, 93-115.
- Patton, A. J. (2006). Modelling asymmetric exchange rate dependence. International Economic Review, 47(2), 527-556.
- Patton, A. J. (2012). A review of copula models for economic time series. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 110, 4-18.
- Reboredo, J. C., & Ugolini, A. (2015). Systemic risk in European sovereign debt market: a CoVaR copula approach. Journal of International Money and Finance, 51, 214-244.
- Sultonov, M., & Jehan, S. N. (2018). Dynamic Linkages between Japan’s Foreign Exchange and Stock Markets: Response to the Brexit Referendum and the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 11, 34.