Brand placement in Web Series: Assessing consumer attitudes in India
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/im.17(2).2021.04
-
Article InfoVolume 17 2021, Issue #2, pp. 33-44
- Cited by
- 1199 Views
-
797 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Reports indicate that 49% of adults in India spend at least 2-3 hours consuming OTT media, rather than watching conventional television. With such changes in the way the general population is exposed to content, brands have also been adapting to the new patterns that this study investigates. This study was conducted to assess consumers’ attitudes and acceptance towards brand placement in the novel media format of web series based on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). This study, based on a survey of 278 individuals from Urban India settings, was conducted using a self-report questionnaire adapted from F Davis’s Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use and User Acceptance of TAM questionnaire (1989). The study supports TAM and recognizes that the frequency of viewing Web Series directly relates to brand recall (R = 0.57, p < .001). Product/brand placement yields brand awareness for unknown or unpopular brands and provide evidence for higher engagement with the placement when the audiences have pre-existing positive attitudes towards the brand (t (277) = 27.11, p = .01). This study also confirms that TAM as a relevant model can be applied to understand how regularity and duration of viewing affect attitudes towards brands and their placement in Web Series. Brand placement in Web Series is perceived as useful and largely determines brand name recall. Thus, marketers should strategically consider using brand placement in Web Series as a part of their marketing communication plan, especially as this media with other related forms of advertisement are important for brands to keep up with the industry’s communication challenges.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)M31, M37, D91
-
References43
-
Tables8
-
Figures1
-
- Figure 1. Operational model used for the purpose of the study
-
- Table 1. Frequency table
- Table 2. Gender
- Table 3. Correlations between the number of Web Series watched and the number of brand name recall
- Table 4. Regression analysis of the predictability of brand name recall by Web Series watched
- Table 5. Differences in responses of Web Series viewers in the recall of new brand names
- Table 6. Chi-square and phi coefficient tests for intention to buy and attitude towards brand placement in Web Series
- Table 7. Attitudes toward familiar and established brands compared to unfamiliar and new brands in Web Series brand placement
- Table 8. Chi-square and Phi coefficient for intention to buy and total attitude towards the brand
-
- Bain & Company. (2020, August 12). SEA’s digital consumer growth leaps past 2025 forecasts in a single year.
- Balasubramanian, S. K. (1994). Beyond advertising and publicity: Hybrid messages and public policy issues. Journal of Advertising, 23(4).
- Balasubramanian, S. K., Karrh, J. A., & Patwardhan, H. (2006). Audience response to product placements: An integrated framework and future research agenda. Journal of Advertising, 35(3), 115-141.
- Biehal, G., Stephens, D., & Curio, E. (1992). Attitude toward the ad and brand choice. Journal of Advertising, 21(3), 19-36.
- Boone, L. E., & Kurtz, D. L. (1998). Contemporary Marketing (8th ed.). LTC Publisher.
- Chan, F. (2012). Product placement and its effectiveness: A systematic review and propositions for future research. The Marketing Review, 12(1).
- Chuan-Chuan Lin, J., & Lu, H. (2000). Towards an understanding of the behavioural intention to use a web site. International Journal of Information Management, 20(3), 197-208.
- Costa-Sánchez, C. (2014). Transmedia storytelling, an ally of corporate communication: #Dropped by Heineken case study. Communication & Society, 26(3), 127-150.
- Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-339.
- Davtyan, D., & Cunningham, I. (2017). An investigation of brand placement effects on brand attitudes and purchase intentions: Brand placements versus TV commercials. Journal of Business Research, 70, 160-167.
- ETBrandEquity, Live Mint, Financial Express, DAN India. (2020, September 14). Urban India’s youth join global binge-watching bandwagon via OTT.
- Fossen, B. L., & Schweidel, D. A. (2019). Measuring the Impact of Product Placement with Brand- Related Social Media Conversations and Website Traffic. Marketing Science, 38(3), 481-499.
- Galib, M. H., Hammou, K. A., & Steiger, J. (2018). Predicting consumer behavior: An extension of technology acceptance model. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 10(3), 73.
- Homer, P. M. (2009). Product placements: The Impact of Placement Type and Repetition on Attitude. Journal of Advertising, 38(3), 21-32.
- Horrigan, D. (2009). Branded content: A new model for driving tourism via film and branding strategies. An International Multidisciplinary Journal of Tourism, 4(3), 51-65.
- Huarng, K., Yu, T., & J., Huang. (n.d.). The impacts of instructional video advertising on customer purchasing intentions on the internet. Service Business, 4, 27-36.
- Hudson, S., & Hudson, D. (2006). Branded entertainment: A new advertising technique, or brand placement in disguise. Journal of Marketing Management, 22(5-6), 489-504.
- Hwang, Y., & Jeong, S.-H. (2018). Editorial Content in Native Advertising. Journal of Advertising Research, 59(2), 208-218.
- Kapoor, R., & Madichie, N. O. (2012). Consumer behaviour: Text and cases. In Consumer behaviour: Text and cases (pp. 87-110). New Delhi: Tata McGraw Hill.
- Katz, D. (1960). The functional approach to the study of attitudes. Public Opinion Quarterly, 24(2, Special Issue: Attitude Change), 163.
- Kit, L. C., & P’Ng, E. L. Q. (2014). The effectiveness of brand placement: The influence of brand placement towards consumer behavior of the millennial generation. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 4(2), 138-142.
- Koufaris, M. (2002). Applying the technology acceptance model and flow theory to online consumer behavior. Information Systems Research, 13(2), 205-223.
- Kureshi, S., & Sood, V. (2010). A review of placement literature: Conceptual and Managerial Implications. The IUP Journal of Marketing Management, 9, 23-29.
- Kwon, E. S. (2012). Exploring Consumers’ Attitudes and Behavior toward Product Placement in Television Shows (Unpublished master’s thesis). Syracuse University.
- Lee, J., Ham, C., & Kim, M. (2013). Why People Pass Along Online Video Advertising: From the Perspectives of the Interpersonal Communication Motives Scale and the Theory of Reasoned Action. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 13(1), 1-13.
- Lehu, J. M. (2009). Branded entertainment: Brand placement and brand strategy in the entertainment business (2nd ed.). Kogan Page.
- Lehu, J.-M., & Bressoud, E. (2008). Effectiveness of brand placement: New insights about viewers. Journal of Business Research, 61(10), 1083-1090.
- Moon, J., & Kim, Y. (2001). Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web context. Information & Management, 38(4), 217-230.
- Nagar, K. (2016). Consumer response to brand placement in movies: Investigating the brand event fit. Vikalpa: The Journal for Decision Makers, 41(2), 149-167.
- Natarajan, T., Balasubramaniam, S. A., Stephen, G., Jublee, D. I., & Kasilingam, D. L. (2018). The influence of audience characteristics on the effectiveness of brand placement memory. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 44, 134-149.
- Newell, J., Salmon, C. T., & Chang, S. (2006). The hidden history of brand placement. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 50(4), 575-594.
- Panda, T. (2004). Consumer response to brand placements in films: Role of brand congruity and modality of presentation in bringing attitudinal change among consumers with special reference to brand placements in Hindi films. South Asian Journal of Management, 11, 8-25.
- Popli, K. (2019, January 30). Scope of digital marketing in 2020 and beyond in India.
- Russell, C. A. (2002). Investigating the Effectiveness of Product Placements in Television Shows: The Role of Modality and Plot Connection Congruence on Brand Memory and Attitude. Journal of Consumer Research, 29(3), 306-318.
- Segarra-Saavedra, J., Tur-Viñes, V., & Del-Pino-Romero, C. (2017). Branded web-serie as an advertising strategy. the #encuentratulugar case.
- Smit, E., Reijmersdal, E. van, & Neijens, P. (2009). Today’s practice of brand placement and the industry behind it. International Journal of Advertising, 28(5), 761-782.
- Suneera Tandon, L. (2020, September 13). Brands seek homegrown OTT platforms as viewership surges.
- Sung, Y., & de Gregorio, F. (2008). New Brand Worlds: College Student Consumer Attitudes toward Brand Placement in Films, Television Shows, Songs, and Video Games. Journal of Promotion Management, 14(1-2), 85-101.
- Surendran, P. (2012). Technology acceptance model: A survey of literature. International Journal of Business and Social Research, 2(4), 175-178.
- van Reijmersdal, E. (2009). Brand Placement Prominence: Good for Memory! Bad for Attitudes? Journal of Advertising Research, 49(2), 151-153.
- van Reijmersdal, E. A., Neijens, P. C., & Smit, E. G. (2007). Effects of television brand placement on brand image. Psychology and Marketing, 24(5), 403-420.
- Verhellen, Y., Dens, N., & Pelsmacker, P. D. (2015). Do I know you? How brand familiarity and perceived fit affect consumers’ attitudes towards brands placed in movies. Marketing Letters, 27(3), 461-471.
- Yeo, S. F., Tan, C. L., Lim, K. B., Leong, I., & Yin, L. J. (2019). Effects of Social Media Advertising on Consumers’ Online Purchase Intentions. 6th International Conference on Science and Social Research.