Benchmarking of bank performance using the life cycle concept and the DEA approach
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/bbs.12(3).2017.06
-
Article InfoVolume 12 2017, Issue #3, pp. 74-86
- Cited by
- 1327 Views
-
294 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Despite the widespread use of benchmarking as an effective tool for improving the efficiency of the bank’s functioning, its implementation does not take into account the relation between comparable performance indicators, the choice of benchmark for comparison, deviations of indicators from target values with stages of the bank’s life cycle, which cause differences in the intensity and characteristics of development of financial institutions. The procedure for identifying a reference bank for comparison is also insufficiently specified, which is important in terms of adapting its experience by the recipient bank due to the possible fundamental differences in their functioning. Therefore, the article has modified the technology of benchmarking of the bank’s performance based on the life cycle concept and the DEA approach.
The research is based on the use of the DEA method to determine the most efficient bank as a reference bank in benchmarking comparison; canonical analysis – for the formation of a list of indicators of bank performance; cluster analysis – to substantiate the levels of deviations of the actual values of comparable indicators from the target ones.
The study envisages, firstly, the selection of indicators for benchmarking comparisons based on the identification of causal relationships between the indicators of subsystems “Finance”, “Customers”, “Business processes”, “Personnel development” that arise at each stage of a bank’s life cycle; secondly, the choice of a benchmark bank for comparison according to the maximum value of the performance indicator calculated through the DEA method for a set of banks that are at one and the same stage of their life cycle; thirdly, definition of the range of deviations (low, permissible, critical) of the actual values of comparable indicators of the effectiveness of management of finance, customer base, business processes and personnel of the bank from the target ones. A practical testing of the benchmarking technology was carried out on the example of Ukrainian banks, whose stage in 2016 was identified as “intense growth”.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)G21, С14, О12
-
References52
-
Tables4
-
Figures1
-
- Figure 1. The sequence and content of the stages of benchmarking relating to the performance of banks
-
- Table 1. Performance indicators and the ranking of banks at the stage of intense growth
- Table 2. Comparable indicators of the reference bank and the recipient bank
- Table 3. Characteristics of clusterization and mean values of deviations of comparable indicators from the reference values (for banks at the stage of intensive growth)
- Table 4. Ranges of deviations of comparable indicators and their levels for BANK GRANT PJSC
-
- Alosani, M. S., Al-Dhaafri, H. S., Bin Yusoff, R. Z. (2016) Mechanism of Benchmarking and Its Impact on Organizational Performance. International Journal of Business and Management, 11(10), 172-183.
- Al-Tarawneh, H. (2014). The Utilization of Bencmarking in the Jordanian Banking Sector. Journal of Management Research, 6(3), 49-57.
- Anand, G., Kodali, R. (2008). Benchmarking the benchmarking models. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 15(3), 257-291.
- Askarany, D. (2014). Characteristics of innovation and the diffusion of benchmarking. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 12(4-2), 563-572.
- Auzair, S. Md. (2010). Organisational Life Cycle Stages and Management Control Systems in Service Organisations. International Journal of Business and Management, 5(11), 56-65.
- Boutin-Dufresne, F., Williams, O., Peña, S., Zawisza, T. A. (2013). Benchmarking Banking Sector Efficiency Across Regional Blocks in Sub-Saharan Africa: What Room for Policy? IMF Working Paper No. 13/51. International Monetary Fund, 28 p.
- Bublyk, M. I., Khimiak, M. M., Liber, M. V. (2009). Benchmarkinh yak sposib oderzhannia konkurentnykh perevah. Naukovyi visnyk NLTU Ukrainy, 19(5), 136-139.
- Camanho, A. S., Dyson, R. G. (2008). A generalisation of the Farrell cost efficiency measure applicable to non-fully competitive settings. International Journal of Management Science, 36, 147-162.
- Camp, R. C. (1989). Benchmarking: The Search for Industry Best Practices That Lead to Superior Performance. New York: Quality Press.
- Chandrasekaran, R., Madhana Gopal, R. (2013). Evaluation of Efficiency and Benchmarking Commercial Banks in India: A Combined PCA and DEA Approach. International Journal of Statistika and Mathematika, 8(2), 60-70.
- Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 427-444.
- Chmutova, I. М., Afanasenko, M. V. (2011). Zovnishnie reitynhove upravlinnia bankom metodom DEA (Data Envelopment Analysis). Problems of Economy, 2, 75-79.
- Chmutova, I., Vovk, V., Bezrodna, O. (2017). Analytical tools to implement integrated bank financial management technologies. Economic Annals–ХХІ, 163(1-2(1)), 95-99.
- Dolgikh, Y. (2015). Otsinka efektyvnosti vyrobnytstva ta realizatsii zerna ta zernobobovykh kultur v Ukraini metodom DEA. Bulletin of Sumy National Agrarian University. Series “Economics and Management”, 5(64), 126-130.
- Emrouznejad, A., Thanassoulis, E. (2010). Measurement of productivity index with dynamic DEA. International Journal of Operational Research, 8(2), 247-260.
- Gaganis, C., Liadaki, A., Doumpos, M., Zopounidis, C. (2009). Estimating and analyzing the efficiency and productivity of bank branches: Evidence from Greece, Managerial Finance, 35, 202-218.
- Gao, J., Alas, R. (2010). The impact of crisis on enterprise life-cycle. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 8(2), 9-20.
- Grigoriev, G. (2010). Problemy otsinky vyrobnychoi efektyvnosti avtomobilnoho transportu Ukrainy. Naukovi zapysky NaUKMA, 107, Ekonomichni nauky, 22-26.
- Gurianova, Е.А., Gurianov, I. N., Mechtcheriakova, S. A. (2014). The Influence of Phase the Organizational Life Cycle on Organizational Structure Management and Transaction Costs, Asian Social Science, 10(20), 137-142.
- Hyatt, L. (2001). Benchmarking: How Does Your Organization Measure Up? Nursing Homes, 50(5), 12-14.
- Ionescu, G., Negrusa, A. L. (2007). The Study about Organizational Life Cycle Models. Review of International Comparative Management, 8(4), 5-17.
- Jaafar, H., Halim, Н. А. (2016). Refining the Firm Life Cycle Classification Method: A Firm Value Perspective, Journal of Economics, Business and Management, 4(2), 112-119.
- Jetmarová, B. (2011). Comparison of Best Practice Benchmarking Models, Problems of Management in the 21st Century, 2(2), 76-84.
- Khodabakhshi, M., Aryavash, K. (2014). The global Malmquist productivity index under the optimistic pessimistic approach of DEA. International Journal of Operations Research, 11(4), 131-137.
- Kloba, R. L. (2009). Reinzhynirynh i benchmarkinh yak instrumenty vdoskonalennia upravlinnia bankivskoiu diialnistiu. Naukovyi visnyk NLTU Ukrainy, 19(5), 247-252.
- Kočišová, K. (2014). Application of Data Envelopment Analysis to Measure Cost, Revenue and Profit Efficiency. Statistika, 94(3), 47-57.
- Kryvoruchko, O. M., Sukach, Ju. O. (2012). Osnovni polozhennia benchmarkinhu biznes-protsesiv ATP. Economics of the transport complex, 20, 77-89.
- Kuzmin, E. A. (2017). Risk and uncertainty in concept of corporate lifecycle. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 15(1), 107-114.
- Ladzani, W. (2016). Benchmarking the South African Excellence Model against world class best practice business Excellence Models. Environmental Economics, 7(4), 8-19.
- Lin, T. T. Lee, C. C., Chiu, T. F. (2009). Application of DEA in Analyzing a Bank’s Operating Performance. Expert system with application, 36(5), 8883-8891.
- Marković, L., Dutina, V., Kovačević, M. (2011). Application of Benchmarking Method in the Construction Companies. Facta universitatis – series: Architecture and Civil Engineering, 9(2), 301-314.
- McEachern, D., Paradi, J. C. (2007). Intra- and Inter-Country Bank Branch Assessment Using DEA. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 27(2), 123-136.
- Memić, D., Škaljić-Memić, S. (2013). Performance Analysis and Benchmarking of Commercial Banks Operating in Bosnia and Herzegovina: a DEA Approach. Business Systems Research, 4(2), 17-37.
- Miencha, I.O., Murugesan, S., Vasanth, V., Lingaraja, K., Raja, M. (2015). Efficiency Measurement of Kenyan Commercial Banks. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(4), 621-631.
- Moriarty, J. P., Smallman, C. (2009). En route to a theory of benchmarking. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 16(4), 484-503.
- National Bank of Ukraine. Banking system indicators (2016).
- Nordström, C., Choi, G. E., Llorach, C. (2012). The Organizational Life Cycle Stages and Effectiveness: A Study of Swedish Gazelle Companies. Bachelor’s Thesis in Business Administration.
- Ombuna, D.S., Omido, K., Garashi, H. M., Odera, O., Okaka, O. (2013). Impact of balanced scorecard usage on the performance of commercial banks. International Journal of Information Technology and Business Management, 10(1), 40-48.
- Ozturk, E., Coskun, A. (2014). A Strategic Approach to Performance Management in Banks: The Balanced Scorecard. Accounting and Finance Research, 3(3), 151-158.
- Paradi, J. C., Rouattb, S., Zhu, H. (2010). Two-stage evaluation of bank branch efficiency using data envelopment analysis, Omega, 39(1), 99-109.
- Porembski, M., Breitenstein, K., Alpar, P. (2005). Visualizing efficiency and reference relations in data envelopment analysis with an application to the branches of a German bank. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 23(2), 203-221.
- Rahimi, F., Fallah, S. (2015). Study of Organizational Life Cycle and its Impact on Strategy Formulation. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 207, 50-58.
- Rajchlová, I. J., & Svatošová, I. V. (2016). Benchmarking study on the venture capital market in the Czech Republic, Hungary and the Netherlands. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 13(3-1), 191-202.
- Rigby, D., Bilodeau, B. (2015). Management Tools & Trends 2015.
- Sherman, H. D., Rupert, T. J. (2006). Do bank mergers have hidden or foregone value? Realized and unrealized operating synergies in one bank merger. European Journal of Operational Research, 168, 253-268.
- Shewell, P., & Migiro, S. (2016). Data envelopment analysis in performance measurement: a critical analysis of the literature. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 14(3-3), 705-713.
- Soteriou, A., Zenios, S. (1999). Operations, Quality, and Profitability in the Provision of Banking Services. Management Science, 45(9), 1221-1238.
- Tysyachna, Yu. S., Azizova, K. M., Rats, O. M. (2015). Kompleksna tekhnolohiia benchmarkinhu yak instrument zabezpechennia finansovoi bezpeky banku. Actual problems of economics, 5, 427-437.
- Vasylieva, Т. А., Chmutova, I. M. (2015). Empirical model of bank life cycle. Actual Problems of Economics, 10(172), 352-361.
- Wu, D., Yang, Z., Liang, L. (2006). Efficiency analysis of cross-region bank branches using fuzzy data envelopment analysis. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 181, 271-281.
- Wu, H. Y. (2012). Constructing a strategy map for banking institutions with key performance indicators of the balanced scorecard. Evaluation and Program Planning, 35(3), 303-320.
- Yasin, M. M. (2002). Theory and practice of benchmarking: then and now. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 9(3), 217-243.