Barriers to the practice of benchmarking in South African restaurants
-
Received February 2, 2017;Accepted March 7, 2017;Published July 26, 2017
- Author(s)
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.15(2-1).2017.09
-
Article InfoVolume 15 2017, Issue #2 (cont. 1), pp. 255-265
- TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ
-
Cited by1 articlesJournal title: Benchmarking: An International JournalArticle title: Rapid benchmarking: the case of a multinational dairy companyDOI: 10.1108/BIJ-03-2020-0099Volume: 28 / Issue: 3 / First page: 1031 / Year: 2021Contributors: Rubab Malik, Robin Mann, Rebecca Knapman
- 1059 Views
-
436 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
The main purpose of this study is to find the barriers of benchmarking use in independent full-service restaurants in South Africa. The global restaurant industry entities operate in a highly competitive environment, and restaurateurs should have a visible ad¬vantage over competitors. A competitive advantage can be achieved only if the quality standards in terms of food and beverage products, service quality, relevant technology and price are comparable to the industry leaders. This study has deployed a descriptive, quantitative research design on the basis of a relatively large sample of restaurateurs. The data was collected through the SurveyMonkey website using a standardised questionnaire The questionnaire was mailed to 2699 restaurateurs, and 109 respondents returned fully completed answer sheets. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyze the data. The main findings were as follows: 43% of respondents had never done benchmarking; only 5.5% respondents considered themselves as highly knowledgeable about benchmarking; respondents thought that the most significant barriers to benchmarking were difficulties with obtaining exemplar (benchmarking partner) best-practice information and adapting the anomalous (own) practices to derive a benefit from best practices. The results of this study should be used to shape the knowledge about benchmarking practices in order to develop suitable solutions for the problems in South African restaurants.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)M1
-
References38
-
Tables3
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Barriers to benchmarking
- Table 2. Ranked barriers
- Table 3. Barriers’ standard deviation
-
- Adebanjo, D. Abbas, A., & Mann, R. (2010). An investigation of the adoption and implementation of benchmarking. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 30(11), 1140-1169.
- Adewunmi,Y. A., Koleoso, H., & Omirin, M. (2016). A qualitative investigation of benchmarking barriers in Nigeria. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 23(7), 1677-1696.
- Al-fawaeer, M., Hamdan, K. B., & Al-zu’bi, H. A. (2012). A study of benchmarking influence on customer satisfaction. International Journal of Business and Management, 7(8), 108-114.
- Brace, I. (2010). Questionnaire design, 2 nd ed., London: Kogan Page Limited.
- Broderick, A., Garry, T., & Beasley, M. (2010). The need for adaptive processes of benchmarking in small business-to-business services. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 25(5), 324-337.
- CATHSSETA. (2013). Role of hospitality industry in the tourism sector.
- Cano, M., Drummond, S., & Kourouklis, A. (2011). A model for benchmarking service quality: small hotels on the periphery. Paper read at the14 th Toulon-Verona Conference an Organizational Excellence in Services University of Alicante – University of Oviedo (Spain), September 1-3, 2011, 245-257.
- Coldwell, D., & Herbst, F. (2004). Business research. Lansdowne: Juta.
- Cooper, C. R., & Schindler, P. S. (2003). Business research methods, 8th ed., New York: McGraw-Hill.
- Deros, B., Yusof, S. M., & Salleh, A. (2006). A benchmarking implementation framework for automotive manufacturing SMEs. Benchmarking, 13(4), 396-430.
- Duggal, E., & Verma, H. (2013). Service quality: construct comprehension and evolution over time. Journal of Services Research, 13(1), 135-160.
- Gerdes, J., Stringam, B., & Brookshire, R. (2008). An integrative approach to assess qualitative and quantitative consumer feedback. Electronic Commerce Research, 8(4), 217-234.
- Hinton, M., Francis, G., & Holloway, J. (2000). Best practice benchmarking in the UK. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 7(1), 52-61.
- Hong, P., Hong, S. W., Roh, J. J., & Kihyun, P. (2012). Evolving benchmarking practices: a review for research perspectives. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 19(4/5), 444-462.
- Hwang, L. J., & Lockwood, A. (2006). Understanding the challenges of implementing best practices in hospitality and tourism SMEs. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 13(3), 337-354.
- Jain, R., Yadov, O., & Rathore, A. (2008). The propagation of benchmarking concepts in Inidan manufacturing industry. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 15(1), 101-117.
- Johann, M., & Padma, P. (2016). Benchmarking holdiay experiences: the case of senior tourists. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 23(7).
- Kale, S., & Karaman, E. (2011). A fuzzy logic model for benchmarking the knowledge management performance of construction firms. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 38(4), 464-478.
- Kozak, M., & Rimmington, M. (1998). Benchmarking: destination attractiveness and small hospitality business performance. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 10(5), 184-188.
- Ladd, S. (2010). Business performance: are American companies benchmarking their way to mediocrity? Financial Executive, 26(9), 11.
- Min, H., & Min, H. (2011). Benchmarking the service quality of fast-food restaurant franchises in the USA. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 18(2), 282-300.
- Moriarty, J. P. (2011). A theory of benchmarking. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 18(4), 588-602.
- Moriarty, J. P., & Smallman, C. (2009). En route to a theory of benchmarking. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 16(4), 484-503.
- Mura, P., & Sharif, S. P. (2015). Exploring rural tourism and sustainability in Southeast Asia through the lenses of official tourism websites: a benchmarking exercise. Worldwide Hospitality and Tourism Themes, 7(5), 440-452.
- Nassar, M. (2012). Exploring current benchmarking practices in the Egyptian hotel sector. Benchmarking, 19(6), 730-742.
- Nayak, S. (2013). Defining service quality for a boutique hotel from a business traveller’s perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Management & Entrepreneurship research, 2(1), 177-204.
- Phillips, P., & Appiah-Adu, K. (1998). Benchmarking to improve the strategic planning process in the hotel sector. Service Industries Journal, 18(1), 1-17.
- Pizam, A., & Shani, A. (2009). The nature of the hospitality industry: present and future managements’ perspective. An International Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Research, 20(1), 134-150.
- Reid, K. (2008). Gaining a competitive advantage using benchmarking. Paint & Coatings Industry, 24(4), 84-88.
- Statistics-SA. (2015). Food and beverages, September 2015.
- Statistics-SA. (2014). Consumer price index key changes in 2014.
- Stringam, B. B., & Gerdes, J. (2010). An analysis of word-of-mouth ratings and guest comments of online hotel distribution sites. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 19(7), 773-796.
- Thompson, A. A., & Strickland, A. J. (2003). Strategic management, 13 th ed., New York:McGraw-Hill.
- Twaissi, N. M., & Alhelalat, J. A. (2015). Competitive benchmarking adoption issues in the hotel sector in Petra, Jordan. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 7(3), 8.
- Vermeulen, W. (2006). The extent of benchmarking in the South African financial sector. SAJEMS, 9(3), 6.
- Vorhies, D. W., & Morgan, N. A. (2005). Benchmarking marketing capabilities for sustainable competitive advantage. Journal of marketing, 69(1), 80-94.
- Williams, C, Brown, C., & Springer, A. (2012). Overcoming benchmarking reluctance: a literature review. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 19(2), 255-276.
- Yusof, S. M., & Aspinwall, E. (2000). A conceptual framework for TQM implementation for SMEs. Total Quality Management Magazine, 12(1), 31-44.
-
The resource-based view: a tool of key competency for competitive advantage
Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 17, 2019 Issue #3 pp. 143-152 Views: 4679 Downloads: 1069 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯThe increasing turmoil in the external organizational setting or business environment has focused attention on capabilities and resources as the primary source of competitive advantage. Obviously, this statement points to the application of the resource-based view (RBV) of organizational management. Nevertheless, what constitutes RBV remains an illusion in many quarters of organizational management, as scholars have managed to put up their personal ideas, and managed to converge on phenomenon-driven theories, in addition to RBV. This paper reviews the concepts of RBV in light of knowledge management to highlight some critical pitfalls that might have eluded the research community on the subject matter of RBV. To this end, this paper’s educational value lies in the fact that it simplifies the concept of RBV to the new researcher in a fashion that is capable of appealing to his or her level. A cross-sectional qualitative research approach was employed in an effort aimed at understanding the role of RBV in creating a sustainable competitive advantage and key competencies. A total of 20 relevant articles were searched from different databases and search engines, including Scopus, EBSCO, ABI Inform, IEEE, PubMed, Science Direct, SABINET, IEEE, Bing, Science Direct, and Google Scholar. The findings indicate that RBV plays an important role and assists organizations not only create, nurture, and maintain competitive advantage, but also understand the collective resources needed to compete favorably in a globalized and highly competitive market. With expert knowledge workers at its core to provide support for knowledge creation, sharing, and utilization, the RBV principles discussed in this paper promise to guarantee a methodological step geared towards the achievement of competitive advantage. It, therefore, makes an incremental contribution to the RBV to attain modest improvement in organizational settings.
-
Vegetable market: competitive advantages of Georgian product and competition challenges
Eter Kharaishvili , Badri Gechbaia , Gela Mamuladze doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/im.14(3).2018.02The paper evaluates the level of competition on the vegetable market. Based on the analysis of the production development trends and resource potential, dynamics and ratio of export and import of agricultural products, including vegetables are presented; dynamics of self-sufficiency ratio of these products is studied; challenges of food security and competitive advantages of Georgian vegetables are identified.
The article concludes that the country has a significant potential for exporting vegetables both to the countries of Europe and Middle East. The paper discusses the factors that hinder export of vegetables; in addition, the ways for reducing dependency on seasonality, opportunities for the development of modern greenhouses and mechanisms for supplying goods to customers all year round are suggested.
On the basis of analyzing the level of competition on the vegetable market, vegetable business is considered as monopolistic. In addition, it is calculated that, currently, local vegetables products account for only 75% of the market.
The paper evaluates the outcomes of high market power caused by monopoly in vegetable business; the impact of market power on pricing mechanism and the welfare of population is determined. In accordance with the problems identified, conclusions are made and recommendations for solving these problems are suggested. -
Barriers to effective value chain management in developing countries: new insights from the cotton industrial value chain
Arthur Mapanga , Collins Ogutu Miruka , Nehemiah Mavetera doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.16(1).2018.03Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 16, 2018 Issue #1 pp. 22-35 Views: 2541 Downloads: 849 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯA rigorous and extensive application of the value chain management (VCM) has become the vogue in modern day business practices and processes. However, due to the complex and multidimensional nature of value chains, achieving efficient and effective value chain management in real value chains remains a major conundrum for practitioners. Many unknown barriers continue to impede effective and efficient value chain management in developing countries’ industrial value chains. The purpose of this study was to find out the common barriers to effective value chain management in a developing country’s industrial value chains using evidence from the cotton industry in Zimbabwe. The analysis was based on survey data sets obtained from 157 purposively sampled experts from the cotton industry value chain in Zimbabwe. Exploratory factor analysis was used to find the barriers to effective value chain management. The results revealed both architectural and governance barriers to effective value chain management. The findings also presented major policy implications for industrial value chains in the developing countries and also indicated areas for further robust research founded on a broader data set from other developing countries’ industrial chains as a way of validating the findings of this study.