Automated trading systems’ evaluation using d-Backtest PS method and WM ranking in financial markets

  • Received April 25, 2020;
    Accepted May 29, 2020;
    Published June 17, 2020
  • Author(s)
  • DOI
    http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.17(2).2020.16
  • Article Info
    Volume 17 2020, Issue #2, pp. 198-215
  • TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ
  • Cited by
    3 articles
  • 1043 Views
  • 426 Downloads

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Given the popularity and propagation of automated trading systems in financial markets among institutional and individual traders in recent decades, this work attempts to compare and evaluate such ten systems based on different popular technical indicators in combination – for the first time – with the d-Backtest PS method for parameter selection. The systems use the technical indicators of Moving Averages (MA), Average Directional Index (ADX), Ichimoku Kinko Hyo, Moving Average Convergence/Divergence (MACD), Parabolic Stop and Reverse (SAR), Pivot, Turtle and Bollinger Bands (BB), and are enhanced by Stop Loss Strategies based on the Average True Range (ATR) indicator. Improvements in the speed of the back-testing computations used by the d-Backtest PS method over weekly intervals allowed examining all systems on a 3.5 years trading period for 7 assets in financial markets, namely EUR/USD, GBP/USD, USD/JPY, USD/CHF, XAU/USD, WTI, and BTC/USD. To evaluate the systems more holistically, a weighted metric is introduced and examined, which, apart from profit, takes into account more factors after normalization like the Sharpe Ratio, the Maximum Drawdown and the Expected Payoff, as well as a newly introduced Extended Profit Margin factor. Among the automated systems examined and evaluated using the weighted metric, the Adaptive Double Moving Average (Ad2MA) system stands out, followed by the Adaptive Pivot (AdPivot), and the Adaptive Average Directional Index (AdADX) systems.

Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Dr. Christos Schinas for his time and invaluable guidance towards the methodology of the weighted metric. We would also like to thank Michalis Foulos for the hardware setup and support and Nektarios Mitakidis for his contribution to the representation of the results.
This research has been co-financed by the European Union and Greek national funds through the Operational Program Competitiveness, Entrepreneurship and Innovation, under the call RESEARCH – CREATE – INNOVATE (project code: T1EDK-02342).

view full abstract hide full abstract
    • Figure 1. Systems’ 3.5-year balance graph (January 2016 – July 2019) with compounding capital using the d-Backtest PS method for parameter selection
    • Figure A1. EUR/USD chart with signals from the Ad1MA strategy
    • Figure A2. EUR/USD chart with signals from the Ad2MA strategy
    • Figure A3. EUR/USD chart with signals from the Ad3MA strategy
    • Figure A4. EUR/USD chart with signals from the AdADX strategy
    • Figure A5. EUR/USD chart with signals from the AdIchimoku strategy
    • Figure A6. EUR/USD chart with signals from the AdMACD strategy
    • Figure A7. EUR/USD chart with signals from the AdParSAR strategy
    • Figure A8. EUR/USD chart with signals from the AdPivot strategy
    • Figure A9. EUR/USD chart with signals from the AdTurtle strategy
    • Figure A10. EUR/USD chart with signals from the AdBBAntiTrend strategy
    • Table 1. Classification occurrences for all systems based on the WM values for d-Backtest PS method
    • Table 2. Classification occurrences for all systems based on the WM values for best BTs
    • Table 3. Classification occurrences for all systems based on the WM values for 6-month constant BT
    • Table B1. Total results for Extended Profit Margin (xPM)
    • Table B2. Total results for Sharpe ratio
    • Table B3. Total results for Drawdown
    • Table B4. Total results for Expected Payoff
    • Table B5. Total results for Profit
    • Conceptualization
      Dimitrios Vezeris
    • Investigation
      Dimitrios Vezeris
    • Methodology
      Dimitrios Vezeris, Ioannis Karkanis, Vasiliki Bizergianidou
    • Supervision
      Dimitrios Vezeris
    • Software
      Themistoklis Kyrgos, Ioannis Karkanis
    • Visualization
      Themistoklis Kyrgos, Ioannis Karkanis, Vasiliki Bizergianidou