Felisitas Defung

This study analyzes the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the performance of 944 Leisure, Arts, and Hospitality companies from 59 countries listed on global stock exchanges between 2018 and 2022. Using Ordinary Least Squares with robust standard errors, the study reveals a consistent and statistically significant negative impact of COVID-19 on the performance of firms. The results highlight the difficulties faced by companies in this industry during the pandemic. In addition, the study investigates the relationship between firm characteristics and company performance during the COVID-19 pandemic, revealing that company size, liquidity, and leverage play crucial roles in influencing firm performance across industries. Larger corporations exhibit greater resiliency, while greater liquidity facilitates better navigation of pandemic-induced obstacles. In contrast, companies with greater leverage experience more pronounced negative effects on their performance, highlighting the significance of debt management during a crisis. Based on these findings, policymakers are strongly urged to provide targeted assistance to Leisure, Arts, and Hospitality industries to address the challenges the pandemic poses effectively. Regulators should encourage the resiliency of larger firms and stress the importance of maintaining higher liquidity levels for financial stability. It is recommended that managers should prudently manage debt to limit pandemic repercussions and boost performance in the face of extraordinary challenges.

The influence of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) risks on bank stability has become a critical area of study in the banking sector. This study examines the influence of ESG risks on bank stability using unbalanced panel data from 134 commercial banks in Indonesia from 2003 to 2022. Employing a fixed effects model, the findings reveal a significant negative effect of ESG risks on bank stability, where higher ESG risks significantly reduce bank stability. Specifically, government-owned banks face a greater stability decline than private banks due to their often higher exposure to regulatory and reputational pressures. Smaller banks are more adversely affected than larger ones because they lack the resources and diversification to effectively mitigate ESG risks. Additionally, non-listed banks experience a larger decrease in stability than listed banks, as the latter tend to have stricter governance structures and more robust risk management practices. These findings underscore the need for tailored risk management strategies to address ESG risks, particularly for government-owned, smaller, and non-listed banks.