Assessment of logistics service quality based on the application of fuzzy methods modeling
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.20(3).2022.44
-
Article InfoVolume 20 2022, Issue #3, pp. 552-576
- Cited by
- 698 Views
-
198 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Improving the logistics service quality (LSQ) requires its assessment to identify appropriate reserves, which actualizes the scientific task of improving the appropriate methodological support for LSQ assessment. The purpose of this paper is to develop a model for assessing the quality of logistics services based on a specified list of criteria, their grouping, and the application of the mathematical apparatus of the fuzzy sets theory.
The study substantiates the expediency of using the fuzzy set method to assess the quality of logistics service and builds an LSQ assessment model that includes 12 criteria grouped into four groups: company reputation, product availability/quality, reliability/flexibility, and consumer service.
As a result of assessing the quality of logistics service, an integral indicator was obtained, which made it possible to determine the evaluations of its components: product availability/quality is rated high; reliability/flexibility – average; consumer service – good; and company reputation – poor. The obtained results indicate that such an aspect of logistics service quality assessment as company reputation needs particular attention, which confirms the modern trend of prioritizing the perception of the quality of logistics service, personal service/contact, and empathy by customers. Therefore, customers’ perception of the quality of logistics service becomes a decisive factor in the competitive struggle in the logistics services market. Moreover, it is a bottleneck in the process of increasing LSQ, which requires further research to develop appropriate management mechanisms.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)L87, L14, D81, L91
-
References35
-
Tables14
-
Figures11
-
- Figure 1. Techniques and methods of assessing the logistics service quality
- Figure 2. Model for evaluating the logistics service quality of logistics operators/providers
- Figure 3. Intermediate parameters (A, B, C, D) and the integral output indicator of the logistics service quality
- Figure 4. Obtaining the intermediate parameter company reputation (A1) in the form of the membership function editor
- Figure 5. Fragment of the rule base for obtaining the intermediate parameter company reputation
- Figure 6. Assessment model of the logistic service quality
- Figure 7. Integral indicator of the logistics service quality (S) in the form of membership functions of the fuzzy output system
- Figure 8. Implemented data defuzzification to the final level of the developed fuzzy model – an integral indicator of the quality of logistics service for Company No. 1
- Figure 9. Defuzzification of the average values of intermediate modules to the final level of the developed fuzzy model
- Figure A1. Realized defuzzification of data to the final level of the developed fuzzy model – an integral indicator of the quality of logistics service for Company No. 2
- Figure A2. Realized defuzzification of data to the final level of the developed fuzzy model – an integral indicator of the quality of logistics service for Company No. 3
-
- Table 1. Criteria for evaluating the logistics service quality
- Table 2. Component assessments of the logistics service quality
- Table 3. General evaluation of the logistics service quality for the developed model
- Table 4. Generalized input, intermediate parameters, and evaluation results of the integral indicator of the logistics service quality
- Table 5. Average integral indicator of the logistics service quality
- Table A1. Indicators for evaluating company reputation (A)
- Table A2. Service/product availability/quality assessment indicators (В)
- Table A3. Indicators of reliability/flexibility (C)
- Table A4. Indicators for evaluating the level of consumer services (D)
- Table A5. Rules for forming an assessment of company reputation (А)
- Table A6. Rules for forming an assessment of product availability/quality (В)
- Table A7. Rules for forming reliability/flexibility assessment (C)
- Table A8. Rules for forming a consumer service assessment (D)
- Table A9. Rules for forming an assessment of the quality of logistics service of logistics operators/providers (S)
-
- Akman, G., & Baynal, K. (2014). Logistics Service Provider Selection through an Integrated Fuzzy Multicriteria Decision Making Approach. Journal of Industrial Engineering, 2014, 116.
- Ali, A. H., Gruchmann, T., & Melkonyan, A. (2022). Assessing the impact of sustainable logistics service quality on relationship quality: Survey-based evidence in Egypt. Cleaner Logistics and Supply Chain, 4, 100036.
- Alkhatib, S. F., Darlington, R., & Nguyen, T. T. (2015). Logistics Service Providers (LSPs) evaluation and selection: Literature review and framework development. Strategic Outsourcing: An International Journal, 8(1), 102-134.
- Arabelen, G., & Kaya, H. T. (2021). Assessment of logistics service quality dimensions: a qualitative approach. Journal of Shipping and Trade, 6, 1-14.
- Bajec, P., & Tuljak-Suban, D. (2017). Selecting a logistics service provider: a definition of criteria that consider the requirements of an external competitive environment. Transport Problems, 12(SE), 157-168.
- Cakir, E., Tozan, H., & Vayvay, O. (2009). A method for selecting third party logistic service provider using fuzzy AHP. Journal of Naval Science and Engineering, 5(3), 38-54.
- Chaohe, Z., & Lijie, Z. (2010). Logistics Service Quality Evaluation. The Conference on Web Based Business Management.
- Clutch. (2022). 2022 Reviews. Top Freight Forwarders in Ukraine.
- Falovych, V. A. (2018). Formuvannia ta rozvytok kompleksu emerdzhentnykh yakostei v lantsiuhu postavok na rynku tovariv promyslovoho pryznachennia [The formation and development of the complex of emergent qualities in the supply chain of industrial products on the market]. Ternopil Ivan Puluj National Technical University. (In Ukrainian).
- Filina-Dawidowicz, L., & Gajewska, T. (2018). Customer Satisfaction in the Field of Comprehensive Service of Refrigerated Containers in Seaports. Periodica Polytechnica Transportation Engineering, 46(3), 151-157.
- Franceschini, F., & Rafele, C. (2000). Quality evaluation in logistic services. International Journal of Agile Management Systems, 2(1), 49-54.
- Frąś, J. (2014). Wybrane instrumenty pomiaru jakości usług logistycznych. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego nr 803: Finanse, Rynki Finansowe, Ubezpieczenia, 66, 297-317. (In Polish).
- Gulc, A. (2017). Models and Methods of Measuring the Quality of Logistic Service. Procedia Engineering, 182, 255-264.
- Hryhorak, M. Y. (2017). Intelektualizatsiia rynku lohistychnykh posluh: kontseptsii, metodolohiia, kompetentnist [Intellectualization of the logistics services market: concept, methodology, competence] (513 p). Kyiv: Sіk Group Ukraine. (In Ukrainian).
- Hwang, B. N., & Shen, Y. C. (2015). Decision Making for Third Party Logistics Supplier Selection in Semiconductor Manufacturing Industry: A Nonadditive Fuzzy Integral Approach. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2015.
- Jamkhaneh, H. B., Shahin, R., & Tortorella, G. L. (2022). Analysis of Logistics 4.0 service quality and its sustainability enabler scenarios in emerging economy. Cleaner Logistics and Supply Chain, 4, 100053.
- Kempny, D. (2008). Obsługa logistyczna [Logistics service]. Katowice, Poland: Wydawnictwo Akademii Ekonomicznej w Katowicach. (In Polish).
- Kilibarda, M., & Andrejic M. (2012). Logistics service quality impact on customer satisfaction and loyalty. 2nd Olympus International Conference on Supply Chains (ICSC 2012). Katerini, Greece.
- Kisperska-Moroń, D., & Krzyżaniak, S. (2009). Logistyka [Logistics]. Poznan, Poland: Instytut Logistyki i Magazynowani. (In Polish).
- Kolodiziev, O., & Hontar, D. (2014). Stsenarne modeliuvannia stratehichnoho upravlinnia rynkovoiu vartistiu banku [Scenario modeling of the bank’s market value strategic management]. Ekonomichnyi chasopys-XXI–Economic annals-ХХI, 2(9-10), 19-23. (In Ukrainian).
- Kolodiziev, O., Tyschenko, V., Ostapenko, V., & Kolodizieva, T. (2018). Assessment of the development level of information and communication infrastructure in the regions of Ukraine. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 16(2), 134-144.
- Kucukaltan, B., Irani, Z., & Aktas, E. (2016). A decision support model for identification and prioritization of key performance indicators in the logistics industry. Computers in Human Behavior, 65, 346-358.
- Limbourga, S., Quynh Giangb, H. T., & Coolsc, М. (2016). Logistics Service Quality: The Case of Da Nang City. Procedia Engineering, 142, 124130.
- Omelchenko, О., Dorokhov, О., Kolodiziev, O., & Dorokhovа, L. (2018). Fuzzy Modeling of Creditworthiness Assessments of Bank’s Potential Borrowers in Ukraine. Economiс Studies, 27(4), 100-125.
- Оvcharenko, А. (2020). Otsiniuvannia yakosti lohistychnoho obsluhovuvannia spozhyvachiv [Evaluating quality of consumers’ logistic service]. Ekonomika pidpryiemstv transportu – Economy of transport enterprises, 35, 160-176. (In Ukrainian).
- Özbek, A., & Eren, T. (2013). Selecting the Third Party Logistic (3PL) Firm through the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). International Journal of Engineering Research and Development, 5(2), 12-20.
- Özispa, N., Kava, O., & Çetinkaya, V. (2020). AHP based selection of third-party logistics service provider. Mersin University Journal of Maritime Faculty, 2(2), 38-43.
- Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1985). A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and Its Implications for Future Research. Journal of Marketing, 49(4), 41-50.
- Parasuraman, A., Ziethaml, V., & Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A Multiple-Item Scale for Measuring Consumer Perceptions of Service Quality. Journal of Retailing, 64, 12-40.
- Perkumiene, D., Osamede, A., Andriukaitienė, R., & Beriozovas, O. (2021). The impact of COVID-19 on the transportation and logistics industry. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 19(4), 458-469.
- Samokhvalov, Yu., & Burba, O. (2018). Otsinka efektyvnosti naukovykh i naukovo-tekhnichnykh proektiv na osnovi uzahalnenoi funktsii kharrinhtona [Assessment of the effectiveness of scientific and scientific and technical projects based on the generalized Harrington function]. Systemy upravlinnia, navihatsii ta zviazku. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats ‒ Control, navigation and communication systems. Collection of scientific paper, 4(50), 77-85. (In Russian).
- Seo, YJ., Ha, M.H., Yang, Z., & Bhattacharya, S. (2018). The Ship Management Firm Selection: The Case of South Korea. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 34(3), 256-265.
- Smolyaga, A. S. (2012). Logisticheskiy servis v tsepyakh postavok stroitelnykh materialov [Logistic services in supply chains of construction materials]. Ekonomika i upravleniye ‒ Economics and management, 29(1), 208-211. (In Russian).
- Stock, G. N., Greis, N. P., & Kasarda, J. D. (1998). Logistics, strategy and structure: A conceptual framework. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 18(1), 37-52.
- Zimon, D. (2015). Impact of the implementation of quality management system on operating cost for small and medium-sized business organizations affiliated to a purchasing group. International Journal for Quality Research, 9(4), 551-564.