Assessment of behavioral factors influencing cooperation in logistics
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ed.18(3).2019.04
-
Article InfoVolume 18 2019, Issue #3, pp. 34-44
- Cited by
- 558 Views
-
127 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
The article explores theoretical and methodical aspects of managing dual relationships that arise between participants in logistic cooperation in the process of formation and functioning of supply chains. The use of a behavioral approach to defining supply chains has allowed identifying and justifying the priority role of behavioral factors that influence modern logistics entities and determine the effectiveness and long-term satisfaction with logistics cooperation. Given the literature summary, the study has classified types of cooperation in logistic activity and proved that among the behavioral factors influencing the of logistical cooperation efficiency, the trust is of particular importance, which remains a limitation, a bottleneck in the process of formation and development of dual relationships in logistics chains. It is proposed to introduce a generic indicator, namely the level of confidence in the supply chain to assess the social, economic and strategic aspects of logistics interaction. A methodological approach to assessing the level of trust in logistic cooperation was adjusted based on determining the composition of criteria that directly affect this indicator and using the expert survey of supply chain participants. The study proposes to use the confidence indicator to form and improve networks and supply chains, taking into account its value when constructing a generalized outsourcing model.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)L14, D03
-
References19
-
Tables3
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Класифікація типів співробітництва в сфері логістичної діяльності
- Table 2. Теоретичні підходи до визначення поняття довіри в контексті його використання в логістиці
- Table 3. Склад факторів та критеріїв для оцінювання рівня довіри в логістичній співпраці
-
- Banomyong, R. (2018). Collaboration in Supply Chain Management: A Resilience Perspective (Discussion Paper). Paris: OECD Publishing.
- Brekalo, L., & Albers, S. (2015). Effective Logistics Alliance Design and Management (Working Paper, No. 113). Cologne: University of Cologne.
- Chukhrai, N. I., & Matvii, S. I. (2014). The redesigning of logistics business-processes in the supply chain. Visnyk Natsionalnoho universytetu “Lvivska politekhnika”. Lohistyka - Bulletin of Lviv Polytechnic National University. Logistics, 811, 403-413. (In Ukrainian).
- Daudi, M., Hauge, J. B., & Thoben, K.-D. (2016). Behavioral factors influencing partner trust in logistics collaboration: a review. Logistics Research, 9, 1-11.
- Handfield, R. B., & Bechtel, C. (2002). The role of trust and relationship structure in improving supply chain responsiveness. Industrial Marketing Management, 31(4), 367-382.
- Krotov, K. V., Kusch, S. P., & Smirnova M. M. (2008). Marketingovyy aspekt upravleniya vzaimootnosheniyami v tsepyakh postavok: rezultaty issledovaniya rossiyskikh kompaniy [Marketing Aspects of Supply Chain Relationship Management: Russian Companies Research Results]. Russian Management Journal, 6(2), 3-26. (In Russian).
- Krykavskyi, E. V. (2013). The new logistics paradigm: strategic status [Nova paradyhma lohistyky: stratehichnyi status]. Naukovi pratsi DonNTU. Seriia Ekonomichna - Scientific works of DonNTU. Economic series, 4(46), 240-247. (In Ukrainian)
- Kulyk, V. A., Hryhorak, M. Yu., & Kostiuchenko, L. V. (2013). Lohistychnyi menedzhment [Logistics management] (267 p.). Kyiv: Lohos. (In Ukrainian)
- Lee, H. L. (2005). Sekret najbardziej efektywnych łańcuchów dostaw. Harvard business review, 24.
- Levchenko, S. G. (2011). Instytut upovnovazhenoho ekonomichnoho operatora: novela zakonodavstva [Authorized Economic Operator Institute: new legislation]. Mitna sprava - Customs business, 4(76), 22-30. (In Ukrainian)
- Logist.FM (2017). Logistika v Ukraine: paradoksy rynka i puti raskrytiya potentsiala [Logistics in Ukraine: market paradoxes and ways to discover potential]. (In Russian).
- Mlaker, K. S., Gorenak, I., & Potocan, V. (2016). The influence of trust on collaborative relationships in supply chains. Economics and Management, 2, 120-131.
- Pomponi, F., Fratocchi, I., Tafuri, S. R., & Palumbo, M. (2013). Horizontal collaboration in logistics: a comprehensive framework. Research in Logistics & Production, 3(4), 243-254.
- Sergeev, V. I. (2006). Yeshche raz k voprosu o terminologii v logistike i upravlenii tsepyami postavok [Once again to the issue of terminology in logistics and supply chain management]. Logistika i upravlenie tsepyami postavok – Logistics and Supply Chain Management, 5(16), 6-18. (In Russian).
- Smirnova, E. A. (2009). Upravleniye tsepyami postavok [Supply Chain Management] (120 p.). SPb.: SPbGUEF. (In Ukrainian).
- Tankov K. M., Bakhurets O. V. (2011). Metodychni pidkhody do vyznachennia i klasyfikatsii lantsiuhiv postavok promyslovykh pidpryiemstv [Methodological approaches to defining and classifying industrial supply chains]. (In Ukrainian).
- Tereschenko, S. S. (2009). Shchodo novoho Mytnoho kodeksu Yevropeiskoho Soiuzu [Regarding the new Customs Code of the European Union]. Mytnyi broker - Customs broker, 9, 66-81. (In Ukrainian).
- Tereschenko, S. S. (2009). Shchodo novoho Mytnoho kodeksu Yevropeiskoho Soiuzu [Regarding the new Customs Code of the European Union]. Mytnyi broker – Customs broker, 10-12, 73-79. (In Ukrainian)
- Zhu, J. (2016). Logistics Horizontal Collaboration: an Agent-Based Simulation Approach to Model Collaboration Dynamics (Ph.D. Thesis) (276 р.). Lancaster University.