Assessing the impact of institutional environment quality on the development of e-commerce in developed and developing countries
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.22(3).2024.26
-
Article InfoVolume 22 2024, Issue #3, pp. 326-340
- 86 Views
-
14 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
This study uses the new institutional economic theory and demonstrates how the quality of the institutional environment can be correlated with the development of e-commerce in different countries. The goal is to analyze the impact of international indices that assess the institutional environment on e-commerce penetration in countries with varying levels of economic development. The international indices used include the Networked Readiness Index, the E-Government Development Index, components of the Index of Economic Freedom, and indicators from The Worldwide Governance Indicators, such as control of corruption and rule of law. The level of e-commerce penetration was measured by its share in retail trade. The study analyzed developed countries with high e-commerce penetration, like the USA, the UK, Germany, South Korea, and Singapore, alongside developing countries, such as China, Turkey, Mexico, and Kazakhstan. The relationships between e-commerce penetration and international indices were identified using correlation analysis with the calculation of Spearman’s coefficient, followed by an assessment of the statistical significance of the obtained coefficients. The analysis revealed varying degrees of association between institutional quality and e-commerce penetration. Notably, the E-Government Development Index and the Networked Readiness Index showed positive correlations with e-commerce levels in all studied countries. However, the rule of law, control of corruption, and Investment Freedom indices showed varying correlations, indicating that these relationships are influenced by factors beyond economic development, such as political systems and regulatory approaches.
Acknowledgment
This study has been funded by the Science Committee of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan (grant IRN AP14871419 “Formation of institutional environment of electronic commerce market in Kazakhstan, its evaluation and development mechanism”).
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)L81, P52
-
References59
-
Tables4
-
Figures1
-
- Figure A1. The share of e-commerce in retail trade in the studied countries from 2007 to 2022
-
- Table 1. Main components of the e-commerce institutional environment
- Table 2. Endogenous variables
- Table 3. Correlation analysis using the Spearman method
- Table 4. Correlations of time series between the share of e-commerce and international indices and their components of measuring the institutional environment
-
- Adam, I. O., Alhassan, M. D., & Afriyie, Y. (2020). What drives global B2C E-commerce? An analysis of the effect of ICT access, human resource development and regulatory environment. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 32(7), 835-850.
- Al-Omoush, Kh. S., Ancillo, A., & Gavrila, S. G. (2022). The role of cultural values in social commerce adoption in the Arab world: An empirical study. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 176, Article 121440.
- Aseri, A., & Morris, R. (2013). Cultural impact on e-commerce: A comparative study. Issues in Information Systems, 14(1), 431-440.
- Bilbao-Osorio, B., Dutta, S., & Lanvin, B. (Eds.). (2013). The global information technology report 2013: Growth and jobs in a hyperconnected world. World Economic Forum and INSEAD.
- Blakeley C. J., & Matsuura J. H. (2004). The use of e-government to encourage e-commerce development. International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies: From Theory to Applications (pp. 15-16). Damascus, Syria.
- Cho, J., Ozment, J., & Sink, H. (2008). Logistics capability, logistics outsourcing and firm performance in an e-commerce market. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 38(5), 336-359.
- Clegg, J. (2019). From the editor: International business policy: What it is, and what it is not. Journal of International Business Policy, 2, 111-118.
- Doh, J., Rodrigues, S., Saka-Helmhout, A., & Makhija M. (2017). International business responses to institutional voids. Journal of International Business Studies, 48, 293-307.
- Dreher, A., & Schneider, F. (2010). Corruption and the shadow economy: An empirical analysis. Public Choice, 144, 215-238.
- Freund, C. L., & Weinhold, D. (2004). The effect of the Internet on international trade. Journal of International Economics, 62(1), 171-189.
- Gibbs, J. L., & Kraemer, K. L. (2004). A cross-country investigation of the determinants of scope of e-commerce use: An institutional approach. Electronic Markets, 14(2), 124-137.
- Gomez-Herrera, M. E., Martens, B., & Turlea G. (2014). The drivers and impediments for cross-border e-commerce in the EU. Information Economics and Policy, 28, 83-96.
- Hawk, S. (2004). Comparison of B2C e-commerce in development countries. Marketing and Trade Electronic Commerce Research, 4(3), 181-199.
- Hendricks, S., & Mwapwele, S. D. (2024). A systematic literature review on the factors influencing e-commerce adoption in developing countries. Data and Information Management, 8(1), Article 100045.
- Hiwarkar, T. (2013). E-commerce infrastructure for the development of technology and communication. International Journal of Advanced Research in Management and Social Sciences, 2(4), 84-94.
- Ho, Ch-S., Kauffman, J. R., & Liang P-T. (2007). A growth theory perspective on B2C e-commerce growth in Europe: An exploratory study. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 6(3), 237-259.
- ITU. (n.d.). DataHub. Households with access to Internet, by type of service.
- Jean, B. R-J., Kim D., & Cavusgil, E. (2020). Antecedents and outcomes of digital platform risk for international new ventures’ internationalization. Journal of World Business, 55(1), Article 101021.
- Jiang, P., Jiang, H., Hu, Y.C., Liang, C., & Wang, S. (2020). Identification of key factors affecting logistics service quality of cross-border e-commerce. Proceedings from: HCI in Business, Government and Organizations: 7th International Conference (pp. 384-396). Denmark.
- Kaufmann, D., & Kraay, A. (2002). Growth without Governance. Economía 3(1), 169-215.
- Kaufmann, D., & Wei, S. J. (1999). Does “grease money” speed up the wheels of commerce? (Working Paper 7093). National Bureau of Economic Research.
- Kpodar, K. R., & Andrianaivo, M. (2011). ICT, financial inclusion, and growth: Evidence from African countries. IMF Working Papers, 2011(073).
- Kraemer, K., Dedrick, J., Melville, N., & Zhu, K. (Eds.). (2006). Global e-commerce: Impacts of National Environment and Policy. Cambridge University Press.
- Kshetri, N. (2007). Barriers to e-commerce and competitive business models in developing countries: A case study. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 6(4), 443-452.
- Martinez, C. A., & Williams, C. (2010). National institutions, entrepreneurship and global ICT adoption: A cross-country test of competing theories. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 11(1), 73-91.
- Merhi, M. I., & Ahluwalia, P. (2018). Digital economy and corruption perceptions: A cross-country analysis. International Journal of Digital Accounting Research, 18, 29-47.
- Molla, A., & Licker P. S. (2005). E-commerce adoption in developing countries: A model and instrument. Information & Management, 42(6), 877-899.
- North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press.
- OECD & WTO. (2017). Aid for trade at a glance 2017: Promoting trade, inclusiveness and connectivity for sustainable development. Paris: WTO, Geneva/OECD Publishing.
- OECD. (2018). OECD Investment Policy Reviews: Kazakhstan 2017. Paris: OECD Publishing.
- OECD. (2019). Unpacking E-commerce: Business models, trends and policies. Paris: OECD Publishing.
- Oxley, E. J., & Yeung, B. (2001). E-commerce readiness: Institutional environment and international competitiveness. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(4), 705-723.
- Rabayah, K. S., Maree, M., & Alhashmi, S. M. (2022). Cultural factors that influence the adoption of e-commerce: A Palestinian case study. Information Development, 38(4), 623-640.
- Ratner, B. (2009). The correlation coefficient: Its values range between +1/−1, or do they? Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing, 17, 139-142.
- Roszko-Wójtowicz, E., Deep Sharma, G., Dańska-Borsiak, B., & Grzelak, M. M. (2024). Innovation-driven e-commerce growth in the EU: An empirical study of the propensity for online purchases and sustainable consumption. Sustainability, 16(4), Article 1563.
- Saha, S., Beladi, H., & Kar, S. (2021). Corruption control, shadow economy and income inequality: Evidence from Asia. Economic Systems, 45(2), Article 100774.
- Scholl, H. J., Barzilai-Nahon, K., Jin-Hyuk, A., Popova, O. H., & Re, B. (2009). E-commerce and e-government: How do they compare? What can they learn from each other? 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Waikoloa, HI, USA.
- Schwab, K. (2019). The global competitiveness report 2019. World Economic Forum.
- Scupola, A. (2003). The adoption of internet commerce by SMEs in the South of Italy: An environmental, technological and organizational perspective. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 6(1), 52-71.
- Sheng, S., Zhou, K. Z., & Li, J. J. (2011). The effects of business and political ties on firm performance: Evidence from China. Journal of Marketing, 75(1), 1-15.
- Spearman, C. (1904). The proof and measurement of association between two things. The American Journal of Psychology, 15(1), 72-101.
- Srivastava, S. C., & Teo, Th. S.H. (2011). Development and impact of e-government: The intertwined role of e-commerce from a cross-country stakeholder’s perspective. Electronic Government, an International Journal, 8(2-3), 144-163.
- Statista. (2024, July 18). E-commerce worldwide – statistics & facts.
- Sui, L., Cao, Y., Zhang, L., & Guo, X. (2011). Analysis of the relationship between Chinese e-commerce and e-government. In D. Jin & S. Lin (Eds.), Advances in Computer Science, Intelligent System and Environment. Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
- Tamin, M., &Abdul Adis, A-A. (2022). The impact of TOE framework on e-commerce advantage among small medium enterprise (SME’s) digital channel in Malaysia. Journal of Distribution Science, 20(8), 33-46.
- Tehan, R., & Information Research Division. (2003). E-commerce statistics: Explanation and sources. Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress.
- United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). (2015). Information economy report: Unlocking the potential of E-commerce for developing countries.
- United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). (2019). World investment report 2019: Special economic zones.
- United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). (2020). World investment report 2020: International production beyond the pandemic.
- United Nations. (UN). (2022). The future of digital government. E-government survey 2022. New York.
- UNCITRAL. (2009). Promoting Confidence in Electronic Commerce: Legal Issues on International Use of Electronic Authentication and Signature Methods.
- Wang, Y., Feng, Q., & Jiang, L. (2023). Broadband infrastructure and local government fiscal risk: Evidence from China. Applied Economics, 55(48), 5613-5636.
- World Economic Forum. (2016). The Global Information Technology Report 2016: Innovating in the Digital Economy.
- Yan, Q., Wu, S., Wang, L., Wu, P., Chen, H., & Wei, G. (2016). E-WOM from e-commerce websites and social media: Which will consumers adopt? Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 17, 62-73.
- Zhanbozova, A. B., Azatbek, T. A., Valieva, S. N., Tuzelbaeva, I. N., & Zhumanazarov, K. B. (2021). The e-commerce market in Kazakhstan: Analysis of the state and development directions. Economics: The Strategy and Practice, 16(1), 34-48.
- Zhao, H., Kim, S., Suh, T., & Du, J. (2007). Social institutional explanations of global Internet diffusion: A cross-country analysis. Journal of Global Information Management, 15(2), 28-55.
- Zhu, K., & Kraemer, K. L. (2005). Post-adoption variations in usage and value of e-business by organizations: Cross-country evidence from the retail industry. Information Systems Research, 16(1), 61-84.
- Zhu, L., & Thatcher, Sh. (2010). National information ecology: A new institutional economics perspective on global e-commerce adoption. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 11(1), 53-72.
- Zimu, F. (2023). Exploring the impact of cultural factors on consumer behavior in e-commerce: A cross-cultural analysis. Journal of Digitainability, Realism & Mastery, 2(03), 31-36.