Assessing statistical link between FinTech PEST environment and achievement of SDGs
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/pmf.10(1).2021.05
-
Article InfoVolume 10 2021, Issue #1, pp. 47-66
- Cited by
- 1158 Views
-
297 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Implementation of SDGs is the unified goal of 193 UN Member States. FinTech plays a crucial role in achieving it. Therefore, the development of FinTech must be facilitated through proper policy-making and public finance, creating beneficial PEST conditions. However, the interaction of the FinTech PEST environment and achievement of SDGs is a topic that has not yet been addressed. The purpose of this study is to assess the link between these two indicators using statistical methods, indicate SDGs having the strongest link to FinTech PEST environment, and explain the interface to facilitate its useful application within government and financial regulations, as well as administration of the state and municipal financial entities. The results show that the economic and investment potential of Northern Europe is caused by the most favorable PEST environment for FinTech sector development, and demonstrate the existence of a statistical link between FinTech PEST environment and SDG4, SDG8, SDG9, SDG16. There is a clear trend – the more favorable the FinTech PEST environment, the better the achievement of SDGs, the better results of Sustainable Finance indicators, and the higher the Sustainable Finance typology assigned to the country. These results suggest that the goals, targets, and indicators of SDG4, SDG8, SDG9, and SDG16 contribute to the formation of a favorable environment and are conductive to the sustainable development of the FinTech industry in a country. Therefore, sustainability in the development of FinTech industry and finance, and the achievement of SDGs, is a circular process of three interacting factors.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)G28, O32, O44, Q01
-
References60
-
Tables15
-
Figures3
-
- Figure 1. Total global investment in FinTech by year, billions of dollars
- Figure 2. Link between FinTech PEST environment and four SDGs
- Figure 3. Link between Sustainable Finance model, SDGs, and PEST environment for the sustainable development of FinTech industry
-
- Table 1. Assessment tool for FinTech sector environment based on the PEST analysis of FinTech sector external environmental indicators
- Table 2. FinTech PEST environment assessment tool adaptation
- Table 3. Values of the FinTech PEST environment assessment presented in descending order
- Table 4. Values and ranks of Sustainable Development Goals for 2016
- Table 5. Kendall, Pearson, and Spearman correlation coefficients measuring the strength of association between FinTech political, economic, social, technological environments and SDG scores
- Table 6. Assignment of SDGs to different FinTech environments according to the correlation strength
- Table 7. Kendall, Pearson, and Spearman correlation coefficients measuring the strength of association between FinTech PEST environment and SDGs
- Table 8. SDG ranking according to the strength of association between FinTech PEST environment scores and SDG scores
- Table 9. Overall trend among the 15 countries in FinTech PEST environment, SDG achievement, and finance model
- Table A1. Assessment tool for FinTech sector environment based on PEST analysis of FinTech sector external environmental indicators
- Table A1 (cont.). Assessment tool for FinTech sector environment based on PEST analysis of FinTech sector external environmental indicators
- Table B1. Normalized values of FinTech PEST environment indicators and their significance
- Table B1 (cont.). Normalized values of FinTech PEST environment indicators and their significance
- Table C1. Goals, targets, and indicators of SDG16, SDG4, SDG8, SDG9, presented in order of SDGs statistical link strength with the FinTech PEST environment
- Table C1 (cont.). Goals, targets, and indicators of SDG16, SDG4, SDG8, SDG9, presented in order of SDGs statistical link strength with the FinTech PEST environment
-
- Arner, D. W., Buckley, R. P., Zetzsche, D. A., & Veidt, R. (2020). Sustainability, FinTech and financial inclusion. European Business Organization Law Review, 1-29.
- Ascher, W. L., & Mirovitskaya, N. (2020). Guide to sustainable development and environmental policy. New York, USA: Duke University Press.
- Bersudskaya, V., Celik, A., Forstater, M., He, M., Mitha, A., Singh, A., & Zadek, S. (2020). People’s Money: Harnessing digitalization to finance a sustainable future (Report).
- Castilla-Rubio, J. C., Zadek, S., & Robins, N. (2016). Fintech and sustainable development. Assessing the implications. Summary (Report). United Nations Environment Programme.
- Cen, T., & He, R. (2018). Fintech, Green Finance and Sustainable Development. Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Management, Economics, Education, Arts and Humanities (MEEAH 2018), 222-225. Atlantis Press.
- Chakravorti, B., Chaturvedi, R. S., Filipovic, C., & Brewer, G. (2020). Digital in the time of COVID. Trust in the digital economy and its evolution across 90 economies as the planet paused for a pandemic. The Fletcher School at Tufts University.
- Conceicao, P. (2020). Human development report 2020. The United Nations Development Programme.
- Dreher, A. (2006). Does globalization affect growth? Evidence from a new index of globalization. Applied Economics, 38(10), 1091-1110.
- Dutta, S., Lanvin, B., & Wunsch-Vincent, S. (2020). The Global innovation index 2020: Who will finance innovation? (13th ed.). Cornell University, INSEAD, and WIPO.
- European Commission (EC). (2020). Digital Finance Package: Commission sets out new, ambitious approach to encourage responsible innovation to benefit consumers and businesses (Press release). Brussels.
- European Commission (EC). (2021). Sustainable Finance and EU Taxonomy: Commission takes further steps to channel money towards sustainable activities (Press release). Brussels.
- Field A., Miles J., & Field Z. (2012). Discovering Statistics Using R. London: Sage.
- Findexable. (2019). The global Fintech index 2020. Findexable Limited & The Global Fintech Index.
- Folke, C., Biggs, R., Norström, A., Reyers, B., & Rockström, J. (2016). Social-ecological resilience and biosphere-based sustainability science. Ecology and Society, 21(3), 41.
- Gygli, S., Haelg, F., Potrafke, N., & Strum, J. E. (2019). The KOF Globalisation Index – revisited. The Review of International Organizations, 14, 543-574.
- Hausemer, Ch. (2020, November 10). Innovating the way to Sustainable Development Goals. Fintech Talents.
- Holmberg, J., & Sandbrook, R. (2019). Sustainable development: what is to be done? In J. Holmberg (Ed.), Policies for a small planet (pp. 19-38). Routledge.
- Hudaefi, F. A. (2020). How does Islamic fintech promote the SDGs? Qualitative evidence from Indonesia. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, 12(4), 353-366.
- International Monetary Fund. (2021). World Economic Outlook (April 2021).
- Jones, P., Hillier, D., & Comfort, D. (2017). The sustainable development goals and the financial services industry. Athens Journal of Business and Economics, 3(1), 37-50.
- Klarin, T. (2018). The concept of sustainable development: From its beginning to the contemporary issues. Zagreb International Review of Economics & Business, 21(1), 67-94.
- KOF Swiss Economic Institute. (2020). KOF Globalisation Index 2020.
- KPMG & CB Insights. (2016). The pulse of Fintech, 2015 in Review. Global Analysis of Fintech Venture Funding.
- KPMG. (2017). The Pulse of Fintech Q4 2016. Global analysis of investment in fintech.
- KPMG. (2018). The Pulse of Fintech Q4 2017. Global analysis of investment in fintech.
- KPMG. (2019). The Pulse of Fintech 2018. Biannual global analysis of investment in fintech.
- KPMG. (2020). Pulse of Fintech H2 2019.
- KPMG. (2021). Pulse of Fintech H2’20.
- Michael, B. (2020). The FinTech Dividend: How Much Money Is FinTech Likely to Mobilize for Sustainable Development?
- Miller, T., Kim, A. B., & Roberts, J. M. (2020). 2020 Index of economic freedom. The Heritage Foundation.
- Muda, I., & Erlina, E. (2020). Sustainable HR development to support successful implementation of offline accounting apps by rural enterprises in Indonesia. Journal of International Studies, 13(4), 70-88.
- National Cyber Security Index (NCSI). (2021).
- Nevado Gil, M. T., Carvalho, L., & Paiva, I. (2020). Determining factors in becoming a sustainable smart city: An empirical study in Europe. Economics and Sociology, 13(1), 24-39.
- Oliinyk, O., Bilan Y., Mishchuk, H., Akimov, O., & Vasa, L. (2021). The Impact of Migration of Highly Skilled Workers on The Country’s Competitiveness and Economic Growth. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 17(3), 7-19.
- Pauliukevičienė, G., & Stankevičienė, J. (2021). Assessment of the impact of external environment on FinTech development. International Scientific Conference Contemporary Issues in Business, Management and Economics Engineering 2021.
- Portney, K. E. (2015). Sustainability. MIT Press.
- Portulans Institute. (2020). The network readiness index 2020: Accelerating digital transformation in a post-COVID global economy.
- Ryu, H. S., & Ko, K. S. (2020). Sustainable Development of Fintech: Focused on Uncertainty and Perceived Quality Issues. Sustainability, 12(18), 7669.
- Sachs, J. D. (2015). The age of sustainable development. Columbia University Press.
- Sachs, J., Schmidt-Traub, G., Kroll, C., Lafortune, G., Fuller, G., & Woelm, F. (2020). Sustainable Development Report 2020. The Sustainable Development Goals and COVID-19. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Schoenmaker, D. (2017). Investing for the common good: A sustainable finance framework. In S. Gardner (Ed.), Bruegel essay and lecture series. Bruegel.
- Schoenmaker, D. (2019). A framework for sustainable finance (Working paper). Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University.
- Schoenmaker, D., & Schramade, W. (2019). Principles of sustainable finance. Oxford University Press.
- Scoones, I. (2016). The politics of sustainability and development. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 41, 293-319.
- Sgro, J., Smalley, P., & Welch, N. (2019). The Fintech Opportunity. In Strengthening the Rules-Based International Order (pp.11-14). Balsillie School of International Affairs.
- Shtal, T., Buriak, M., Ukubassova, G., Amirbekuly, Y., Toiboldinova, Z., & Tlegen, T. (2018). Methods of analysis of the external environment of business activities. Revista Espacios, 39(12).
- SolAbility. (2020). The sustainable competitiveness report 2020. SolAbility Sustainable Intelligence.
- Speedtest. (2020). Speedtest global index 2020.
- Talent Solutions. (2020). Total workforce index 2020 global analysis. ManpowerGroup Talent Solutions.
- U.S. News. (2020). Best countries 2020: Global rankings, international news and data insights.
- UN Environment FC4S. (2019). Sustainable Finance and Fintech in Europe. UN Environment FC4S & Stockholm Green Digital Finance.
- UN General Assembly. (2015). Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015. 70/1. Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.
- UN Global Compact & KPMG International. (2015). SDG industry matrix. Financial Services.
- United Nations (UN). (2015). Adoption of the Paris agreement. In Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Paris.
- United Nations (UN). (2019). Methodology: Standard country or area codes for statistical use (M49). Geographic Regions. Statistics Division
- United Nations (UN). (2020). E-participation index 2020. UN E-Government Knowledgebase.
- United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). (2015). Annual Report 2015.
- Weitzman, M. L. (2002). Sustainability and technical progress. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 99(1), 1-13.
- World Bank Group. (2020). Doing business 2020.
- Ziolo, M., Bak, I., & Cheba, K. (2021). The role of Sustainable Finance in achieving Sustainable Development Goals: does it work? Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 27(1), 45-70