Assessing payment for ecosystem services to improve lake water quality using the InVEST model
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ee.15(1).2024.12
-
Article InfoVolume 15 2024, Issue #1, pp. 149-173
- 385 Views
-
61 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Payment for ecosystem services is a conservation strategy designed to offer farmers financial incentives for managing land to provide ecological benefits without disturbing livelihoods. However, the distribution of spatial financial feasibility is challenging when implementing this strategy on watershed scale. This study aimed to develop payment for ecosystem services model to improve quality in lake water catchment. The model estimated incentive values based on the costs of farmers’ losses, water yields, and pollution loads. The potential loss was calculated by determining the income of farmers in lake water catchment spent on land conversion from intensive agriculture to agroforestry. Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoffs (InVEST) modeling tool was used to calculate water yield and pollution load. The model was tested with case study approach at Lake Rawa Pening in Indonesia, consisting of nine sub-basins and 75 village administrations. The results showed that the reference compensation for farmers was 1,255.97 USD/ha/year. Considering the spatial distribution of water yields, the incentive for each village varied widely from 891.54 USD/ha/year to 1,557.06 USD/ha/year, even within the same sub-basin. Ten villages had an incentive above 1,450.00 USD/ha/year. However, considering the water pollution load, 26 villages had an incentive above 1,450.00 USD/ha/year with a maximum of 2,024.17 USD/ha/year. Therefore, village boundary should be an analysis unit for determining spatial incentive feasibility rather than a sub-basin boundary. Moreover, the level of water pollution load can become an additional variable to justify the amount of incentives received by farmers.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)Q57, Q51, Q56, O13
-
References80
-
Tables13
-
Figures6
-
- Figure 1. Lake Rawa Pening basin
- Figure 2. Workflow of MPES model
- Figure 3. Spatial distribution of the result of the InVEST model
- Figure 4. Spatial distribution of ES AWC and TC
- Figure 5. Spatial distribution of PES value
- Figure A1. Input data for InVEST model
-
- Table A1. Reference evapotranspiration station
- Table B1. Description of PAWC value
- Table C1. Average annual precipitation in the Rawa Pening basin
- Table D1. Biophysical table
- Table E1. Biophysical table of InVEST model for NDR
- Table F1. Potential loss of farmer’s income
- Table G1. Data of observed water discharge
- Table G2. Data of estimated water yield
- Table G3. A comparison of estimated water yield and observed water yield
- Table H1. Data on observed water quality
- Table H2. Estimated data of the InVEST model
- Table H3. Comparison of estimated and observed TP in Lake Rawa Pening
- Table J1. Distribution of PES value of each village in LWC of Rawa Pening
-
- Admasu, W. F., Van Passel, S., Minale, A. S., Tsegaye, E. A., & Nyssen, J. (2024). Nexus between land development and the value of ecosystem services in Ethiopia: A contingent valuation study. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26(2), 3193-3213.
- Anderson, M. D., Preetha, P. P., & Al Hamdan, A. Z. (2021). Assessment of climate variability and short-term land use land cover change effects on water quality of Cahaba River Basin. International Journal of Hydrology Science and Technology, 11(1), 54-75.
- Asfawi, S., Probandari, A., Setyono, P., & Hartono. (2021). Comparison of the health cost of organic and conventional vegetable cultivation in Getasan sub-district, Semarang, Indonesia. Journal of Environmental Science and Management, 24(1), 36-44.
- Asharp, G., & Sivachandiran, S. (2018). Effect of partial shade and weeding intervals on growth and yield performance of Chilli (Capsicum frutescens L.) in dry zone of Sri Lanka. Journal of Agricultural Studies, 6(4), 64-73.
- Atiso, H., & Fanjana, F. (2020). Contribution of agroforestry home gardens to household income generation in Boloso Bombe District, Southern Ethiopia. Agricultural Research & Technology: Open Access Journal, 25(2), Article 556295.
- Ávila-Lovera, E., Blanco, H., Móvil, O., Santiago, L. S., & Tezara, W. (2021). Shade tree species affect gas exchange and hydraulic conductivity of cacao cultivars in an agroforestry system. Tree Physiology, 41(2), 240-253.
- Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Semarang [Bureau of Statistics of Semarang Regency]. (2022a). Statistik Produksi Tanaman Hortikultura [Statistics on Horticultural Production]. (In Indonesian).
- Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Semarang [Bureau of Statistics of Semarang Regency]. (2022b). Statistik Produksi Tanaman Pangan [Statistics on Crop Production]. (In Indonesian).
- Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Semarang [Bureau of Statistics of Semarang Regency]. (2022c). Statistik Harga Produsen Pertanian Subsektor Tanaman Pangan, Hortikultura, dan Tanaman Perkebunan Rakyat [Statistics on Agricultural Producer Prices for the Food Crops, Horticulture and Private Plantation]. (In Indonesian).
- Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Semarang [Bureau of Statistics of Semarang Regency]. (2022d). Perkembangan Nilai Tukar Petani, Harga Gabah dan Beras Rilis Oktober 2023 [Developments in Farmer Exchange Rates, Grain and Rice Prices Released on October 2022]. (In Indonesian).
- Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Semarang [Bureau of Statistics of Semarang Regency]. (2023). Perkembangan Nilai Tukar Petani, Harga Gabah dan Beras Rilis Desember 2022 [Developments in Farmer Exchange Rates, Grain and Rice Prices Released on December 1 2022]. (In Indonesian).
- Banela, M., Kyvelou, S. S., & Kitsiou, D. (2024). Mapping and assessing cultural ecosystem services to inform maritime spatial planning: A systematic review. Heritage, 7(2), 697-736.
- Budyko, M. I. (1974). Climate and life. Academic Press.
- Chen, Y., Kou, W., Ma, X., Wei, X., Gong, M., Yin, X., Li, J., & Li, J. (2022). Estimation of the value of forest ecosystem services in Pudacuo National Park, China. Sustainability, 14(17), Article 10550.
- de Mendonça, G. C., da Costa, L. M., Abdo, M. T. V. N., Costa, R. C. A., Parras, R., de Oliveira, L. C. M., Pissarra, T. C. T., & Pacheco, F. A. L. (2023). Multicriteria spatial model to prioritize degraded areas for landscape restoration through agroforestry. MethodsX, 10, Article 102052.
- Dinas Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan Provinsi Jawa Tengah [Environment and Forestry Department of Central Java Province]. (2023). Data dan Informasi Kegiatan Penyelamatan Danau Rawa Pening [Data and Information of the Activities of the Conservation of Lake Rawa Pening]. (In Indonesian).
- Edwards, C., & Miller, M. (2001). PLOAD Version 3.0 user’s manual. USEPA.
- Efendi, E. R. P., Santoso P, J., & Sukendah. (2022). Pengaruh pemberian naungan terhadap pertumbuhan dan hasil tanaman terong ungu (Solanum melongena L.) [The effect of providing shade on the growth and yield of eggplant (Solanum melongena L.)]. Jurnal Agrotech [Agrotech Journal], 12(2), 57-65. (In Indonesian).
- Fahad, S., Chavan, S. B., Chichaghare, A. R., Uthappa, A. R., Kumar, M., Kakade, V., Pradhan, A., Jinger, D., Rawale, G., Yadav, D. K., Kumar, V., Farooq, T. H., Ali, B., Sawant, A. V., Saud, S., Chen, S., & Poczai, P. (2022). Agroforestry systems for soil health improvement and maintenance. Sustainability, 14(22), Article 14877.
- Febrian, T., Syaukat, Y., & Ekayani, M. (2018). Alokasi dan pemanfaatan kompensasi pembayaran imbal jasa lingkungan air Kota Cirebon dan Kabupaten Kuningan [Allocation and use of compensation of payment for environmental services in Cirebon City and Kuningan Regency]. Jurnal Ilmu Pertanian Indonesia [Indonesian Journal of Agricultural Science], 23(2), 127-136. (In Indonesian).
- Guo, T., Wu, S., Zhang, X., Zhang, C., Yang, J., & Cheng, S. (2023). Measurement and influencing factors of willingness to accept payment for ecosystem service provision: A case study of a leading forest farm in China. Forests, 14(12), Article 2417.
- Hossain, M. S., Oluwajuwon, T. V., Ludgen, A. N., Hasert, D. P., Sitanggang, M., & Offiah, C. (2023). Formulating biomass allometric model for Paraserianthes falcataria (L) Nielsen (Sengon) in smallholder plantations, Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. Forest Science and Technology, 19(4), 268-284.
- Hudha, F. V., Asnawati, A., & Rahmidiyani, R. (2023). Pengaruh naungan dan pemberian urea terhadap pertumbuhan dan hasil tanaman bawang daun pada tanah gambut [The effect of shading and providing fertilizer on the growth and yield of leek plants on the peat soil]. Jurnal Sains Pertanian Equator [Journal of Equator Agricultural Science], 12(4), Article 1099. (In Indonesian).
- Ioannidou, S., Litskas, V., Stavrinides, M., & Vogiatzakis, I. (2022). Placing ecosystem services within the water-food-energy-climate nexus: A case study in Mediterranean mixed orchards. Agronomy, 12(9), Article 2224.
- Islam, K. K., Fujiwara, T., & Hyakumura, K. (2022). Agroforestry, livelihood and biodiversity nexus: The case of Madhupur Tract, Bangladesh. Conservation, 2(2), 305-321.
- Jayawardana, J. M. C. K., Gunawardana, W. D. T. M., Udayakumara, E. P. N., & Fernando, S. (2023). Biomonitoring of pesticides in agricultural river catchments: A case study from two river catchments in tropical Sri Lanka. Aquatic Ecology, 57(2), 337-352.
- Johnston, M., & Onwueme, I. C. (1998). Effect of shade on photosynthetic pigments in the tropical root crops: Yam, taro, tannia, cassava and sweet potato. Experimental Agriculture, 34(3), 301-312.
- Khamidov, M., Ishchanov, J., Hamidov, A., Donmez, C., & Djumaboev, K. (2022). Assessment of soil salinity changes under the climate change in the Khorezm Region, Uzbekistan. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(14), Article 8794.
- Kremen, C. (2020). Ecological intensification and diversification approaches to maintain biodiversity, ecosystem services and food production in a changing world. Emerging Topics in Life Sciences, 4(2), 229-240.
- Lee, S., & Kim, T.-G. (2024). Economic value of ocean education in Korea using the contingent valuation method (CVM). Journal of Coastal Research, 116(sp1).
- Li, J., Liu, W., & Zhang, Y. (2023). Agricultural wetland utilization based on land cover restoration and water-ecosystem nexus. Water Supply, 23(9), 3819-3831.
- Li, S., Hui, B., Jin, C., Liu, X., Xu, F., Su, C., & Li, T. (2022a). Considering farmers’ heterogeneity to payment ecosystem services participation: A choice experiment and agent-based model analysis in Xin’an River Basin, China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(12), Article 7190.
- Li, W., Zhao, Z., Lyu, S., & Zhao, W. (2022b). Research on the spatiotemporal differentiation of water purification function based on the InVEST model. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 41(3), 105-113. (In Chinese).
- Li, X., & Zipp, K. Y. (2019). Dynamics and uncertainty in land use conversion for perennial energy crop production: Exploring effects of payments for ecosystem services policies. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 48(2), 328-358.
- Lliso, B., Pascual, U., & Engel, S. (2021). On the role of social equity in payments for ecosystem services in Latin America: A practitioner perspective. Ecological Economics, 182, Article 106928.
- Luo, W., Jiang, Y., Chen, Y., & Yu, Z. (2023). Coupling coordination and spatial-temporal evolution of water-land-food nexus: A case study of Hebei Province at a county-level. Land, 12(3), Article 595.
- Meetei, T. T., Choudhury, B. U., Mohapatra, K. P., Singh, N. U., Das, A., & Devi, Y. B. (2020). Effect of 25 years old agroforestry practices on soil quality attributes in the north eastern Himalayan region of India. International Journal of Chemical Studies, 8(1), 2371-2379.
- Miralles-Wilhelm, F. (2023). Nature-based solutions in agricultural landscapes for reducing tradeoffs between food production, climate change, and conservation objectives. Frontiers in Water, 5.
- Moriasi, D. N., Arnold, J. G., Van Liew, M. W., Bingner, R. L., Harmel, R. D., & Veith, T. L. (2007). Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Transactions of the ASABE, 50(3), 885-900.
- Munyaradzi, M., Hapanyengwi, G., Masocha, M., Mutandwa, E., Raeth, P., Nyambo, B., Murwira, A., & Mashonjowa, E. (2022). Precision irrigation scheduling based on wireless soil moisture sensors to improve water use efficiency and yield for winter wheat in Sub-Saharan Africa. Advances in Agriculture, 2022, Article 8820764.
- Mwendera, E., Musetsho, K. D., Madzivhandila, T., Makungo, R., Mamphweli, N. S., Nephawe, K. A., & Volenzo, T. (2023). Integrating water-energy-food nexus innovations and practices into policy, governance and institutional frameworks for sustainable development in Vhembe District, Limpopo Province, South Africa: Literature review. International Journal of Food Science and Agriculture, 7(3), 346-359.
- Ningrum, A., Setiawan, Y., & Tarigan, S. D. (2022). Annual water yield analysis with InVEST Mmdel in Tesso Nilo National Park, Riau Province. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 950(1).
- Nuñez Godoy, C. C., & Pienaar, E. F. (2023). Motivations for, and barriers to, landowner participation in Argentina’s payments for ecosystem services program. Conservation Science and Practice, 5(8), Article e12991.
- Oswald, A., Alkämper, J., & Midmore, D. J. (1995). The effect of different shade levels on growth and tuber yield of sweet potato: II. Tuber yield. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 175(1), 29-40.
- Pandey, B., & Ghosh, A. (2023). Urban ecosystem services and climate change: A dynamic interplay. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities, 5.
- Paudel, S., Baral, H., Rojario, A., Bhatta, K. P., & Artati, Y. (2022). Agroforestry: Opportunities and challenges in timor-leste. Forests, 13(1), Article 41.
- Pissarra, T. C. T., Fernandes, L. F. S., & Pacheco, F. A. L. (2021). Production of clean water in agriculture headwater catchments: A model based on the payment for environmental services. Science of the Total Environment, 785, Article 147331.
- Qiu, M., Wei, X., Hou, Y., Spencer, S. A., & Hui, J. (2023). Forest cover, landscape patterns, and water quality: A meta-analysis. Landscape Ecology, 38(4), 877-901.
- Rashmi, I., Roy, T., Kartika, K. S., Pal, R., Coumar, V., Kala, S., & Shinoji, K. C. (2020). Organic and inorganic fertilizer contaminants in agriculture: Impact on soil and water resources. In M. Naeem, A. Ansari, & S. Gill (Eds.), Contaminants in Agriculture: Sources, Impacts and Management (pp. 3-41). Cham: Springer.
- Rinady, M. V. P., Nuraini, Y., Prayogo, C., & Arfarita, N. (2023). The effect of land management and organic matter inputs on bacterial population and soil nutrients across different types of agroforestry system. Biodiversitas, 24(3), 1333-1345.
- Rosehan, N. S., Abas, A., & Aiyub, K. (2020). Studies on the cultural ecosystem services in Malacca city. Planning Malaysia, 18(2), 133-144.
- Sahu, P., Bakkashetti, S., & Sahoo, S. N. (2024). Prioritization of sub-watersheds for soil conservation management using morphometric, biophysical and socioeconomic characteristics: A fuzzy AHP approach. Environmental Earth Sciences, 83(3), Article 102.
- Sellami, M. H., & Terribile, F. (2023). Research evolution on the impact of agronomic practices on soil health from 1996 to 2021: A bibliometric analysis. Soil Systems, 7(3), Article 78.
- Sharma, R., Nehren, U., Rahman, S. A., Meyer, M., Rimal, B., Seta, G. A., & Baral, H. (2018). Modeling land use and land cover changes and their effects on biodiversity in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. Land, 7(2), Article 57.
- Sharp, R., Chaplin-Kramer, R., Wood, S. A., Guerry, A., Tallis, H., Ricketts, T., Nelson, E. J., Ennaanay, D, Wolny, S, Olwero, N., Vigerstol, K., Pennington, D. N., Mendoza, G., Aukema, J., Foster, J., Forrest, J., Cameron, D. R., Arkema, K., Lonsdorf, E. V., ... Douglass, J. (2016). InVEST 3.4.4 user’s guide. Stanford University Press.
- Sieber, I. M., Montero-Hidalgo, M., Kato-Huerta, J., Rendon, P., Santos-Martín, F., Geneletti, D., Gil, A., Trégarot, E., Lagabrielle, E., Parelho, C., Arbelo, M., van Beukering, P., Bayley, D., Casas, E., Duijndam, S., Cillaurren, E., David, G., Dourdain, A., Haroun, R., … Burkhard, B. (2022). Mapping and assessing ecosystem services in Europe’s overseas: A comparative analysis of MOVE case studies. One Ecosystem, 7, Article e87179.
- Sopacua, F., Wijayanto, N., & Wirnas, D. (2021). Growth of three types of sengon (Paraserianthes spp.) in varying planting spaces in agroforestry system. Biodiversitas, 22(10), 4423-4430.
- Sulistiyono, N., Marsudi, S., Ahda, M., Asmanijar, W., Tobing, G. L., & Zahirah, A. (2023). The economic value of forest environmental services for mitigating human-wildlife conflict in the village around management section of national park (MNSP) VI Besitang, Gunung Leuser National Park. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1188(1).
- Sunaedi, N., Hadi, S. P., & Bambang, A. N. (2019). Community-Based environmental management through the payments for environmental services program in Cidanau Watershed, Banten Province, Indonesia. IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 338.
- Talukdar, A., Schneider, P., Begum, A., Kawsar, M. A., Sultana, M. A., Sumon, T. A., Rashed-Un-nabi, M., Mozumder, M. M. H., & Shamsuzzaman, M. M. (2022). The premium of Hilsa Sanctuary: A socio-economic and ecological evaluation from the Meghna Estuary, Bangladesh. Sustainability, 14(13), Article 7782.
- Tang, J., Xin, M., & Wang, X. (2022). Herdsmen’s willingness to accept compensation for grazing ban compliance: Empirical evidence from pastoral China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 361, Article 132102.
- Tesfaw, A., Senbeta, F., Alemu, D., & Teferi, E. (2022). Estimating the economic values of restricted monoculture eucalyptus plantations: A choice modeling approach. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(15), Article 9073.
- Tigabu, T. B., Wagner, P. D., Hörmann, G., & Fohrer, N. (2019). Modeling the impact of agricultural crops on the spatial and seasonal variability of water balance components in the Lake Tana basin, Ethiopia. Hydrology Research, 50(5), 1376-1396.
- Udawatta, R. P. (2021). Flood control and air cleaning regulatory ecosystem services of agroforestry. In R. P. Udawatta & S. Jose (Eds.), Agroforestry and Ecosystem Services (pp. 305-330). Cham: Springer.
- UN. (n.d.). World population projected to reach 9.8 billion in 2050, and 11.2 billion in 2100.
- Ureta, J. C., Motallebi, M., Vassalos, M., Seagle, S., & Baldwin, R. (2022). Estimating residents’ WTP for ecosystem services improvement in a payments for ecosystem services (PES) program: A choice experiment approach. Ecological Economics, 201, Article 107561.
- Wang, H., Wang, W. J., Wang, L., Ma, S., Liu, Z., Zhang, W., Zou, Y., & Jiang, M. (2022). Impacts of future climate and land use/cover changes on water-related ecosystem services in Changbai Mountains, Northeast China. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 10.
- Wang, P., & Xu, M. (2023). Dynamics and interactions of water-related ecosystem services in the Yellow River Basin, China. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 33(8), 1681-1701.
- Warziniack, T., Sham, C. H., Morgan, R., & Feferholtz, Y. (2017). Effect of forest cover on water treatment costs. Water Economics and Policy, 3(4).
- White, A. C., Faulkner, J. W., Conner, D. S., Mendez, V. E., & Niles, M. T. (2022). “How can you put a price on the environment?” Farmer perspectives on stewardship and payment for ecosystem services. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 77(3), 270-283.
- White, M., Harmel, D., Yen, H., Arnold, J., Gambone, M., & Haney, R. (2015). Development of sediment and nutrient export coefficients for U.S. ecoregions. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 51(3), 758-775.
- Wiersum, K. F. (1983). Early experiments in agroforestry: Colonial tobacco cultivation with tree fallows in Deli, Sumatra. International Tree Crops Journal, 2(3-4), 313-322.
- Withers, P. J. A., & Jarvie, H. P. (2008). Delivery and cycling of phosphorus in rivers: A review. Science of the Total Environment, 400(1-3), 379-395.
- Wondimenh, S. (2023). The contribution of traditional agroforestry systems and challenges of adoption by smallholder farmers in Ethiopia. A review. East African Journal of Forestry and Agroforestry, 6(1), 18-32.
- Wu, Y., Wang, S., Ni, Z., Li, H., May, L., & Pu, J. (2021). Emerging water pollution in the world’s least disturbed lakes on Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Environmental Pollution, 272, Article 116032.
- Ye, L., Chen, K., Cheng, J., Tan, L., Zhang, M., Zhang, X., & Cai, Q. (2023). Ecological water quality of the Three Gorges Reservoir and its relationship with land covers in the reservoir area: Implications for reservoir management. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 11.
- Zhao, L., Shen, Y. J., Liu, M., Wang, Y., Li, Y., & Pei, H. (2023). The impacts of land use changes on water yield and water conservation services in Zhangjiakou, Beijing’s Upstream Watershed, China. Sustainability, 15(14), Article 11077.
- Zhou, W., Liu, G., Pan, J., & Feng, X. (2005). Distribution of available soil water capacity in China. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 15(1), 3-12.
- Zhu, X., Liu, W., Chen, J., Bruijnzeel, L. A., Mao, Z., Yang, X., Cardinael, R., Meng, F. R., Sidle, R. C., Seitz, S., Nair, V. D., Nanko, K., Zou, X., Chen, C., & Jiang, X. J. (2020). Reductions in water, soil and nutrient losses and pesticide pollution in agroforestry practices: A review of evidence and processes. Plant and Soil, 453(1-2), 45-86.
- Zhu, Y., & Chen, J. (2022). Small-scale farmers’ preference heterogeneity for green agriculture policy incentives identified by choice experiment. Sustainability, 14(10), Article 5770.