Applying advanced sentiment analysis for strategic marketing insights: A case study of BBVA using machine learning techniques
-
Received September 1, 2023;Accepted April 3, 2024;Published April 17, 2024
-
Author(s)Link to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2119-4532Link to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4790-0351Link to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5353-2017
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/im.20(2).2024.09
-
Article InfoVolume 20 2024, Issue #2, pp. 100-115
- TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ
- 658 Views
-
281 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
In the digital era, understanding public sentiment toward brands on social media is essential for crafting effective marketing strategies. This study applies sentiment analysis on Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria (BBVA) tweets using advanced machine learning techniques, particularly the eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) algorithm, which showed remarkable precision (91.2%) in sentiment classification. This process involved a systematic approach to data collection, cleaning, and preprocessing. The precision of XGBoost highlights its effectiveness in analyzing social media conversations about banking. Additionally, this paper achieved improvements in neutral tweet classification, with accuracy rates at 87-88% and a reduced misclassification rate, enhancing the analysis reliability. The findings not only uncover general sentiments toward BBVA but also provide insight into how these sentiments shift in response to marketing activities and global events. This gives marketers a valuable tool for real-time assessment of campaign effectiveness and brand perception. Ultimately, employing the XGBoost algorithm for sentiment analysis offers BBVA a strategic advantage in understanding and engaging its online audience, demonstrating the significant benefits of using sophisticated machine learning in banking. The study emphasizes the crucial role of data-driven sentiment analysis in developing informed business strategies and improving customer relationships in the banking industry’s competitive landscape.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)M31, G21
-
References54
-
Tables4
-
Figures10
-
- Figure 1. Sentiment analysis process
- Figure 2. Negative tweet feeling histogram
- Figure 3. Neutral tweet feeling histogram
- Figure 4. Positive tweet feeling histogram
- Figure 5. Confusion matrix classification vs feeling
- Figure 6. Histogram over 3,000 tweets with new properties
- Figure 7. SVM confusion matrix
- Figure 8. XGBoost confusion matrix
- Figure 9. Random Forest confusion matrix
- Figure 10. Confusion matrix neural networks
-
- Table 1. Distribution of tweets based on the manual classification and automatic classification (CNL) of the feeling of the tweets
- Table 2. Comparison of precision between algorithms
- Table 3. Comparison of results between algorithms
- Table 4. Comparison improvement of results of the XGBoost algorithm
-
- Aarshay, J. (2016). Complete guide to parameter tuning in XGBoost with codes in Python. GitHub.
- American Bankers Association. (2023). Banks report active social media engagement.
- Amolik, A., Jivane, N., Bhandari, M., & Venkatesan, M. (2016). Twitter sentiment analysis of movie reviews using machine learning techniques. International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 7(6), 1-7.
- Anshari, M., Almunawar, M. N., Lim, S. A., & Al-Mudimigh, A. (2019). Customer relationship management and big data enabled: Personalization & customization of services. Applied Computing and Informatics, 15(2), 94-101.
- Auter, Z., & Fine, J. (2018). Social media campaigning: Mobilization and fundraising on Facebook. Social Science Quarterly, 99(1), 185-200.
- Balahur, A., Kozareva, Z., & Montoyo, A. (2009). Determining the polarity and source of opinions expressed in political debates. In A. Gelbukh (Ed.), Computational linguistics and intelligent text processing (pp. 468-480). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
- Başarslan, M. S., & Kayaalp, F. (2020). Sentiment analysis with machine learning methods on social media. Advances in Distributed Computing and Artificial Intelligence Journal, 9(3), 5-15.
- Bonnet, D., & Westerman, G. (2021). The new elements of digital transformation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 62, 82-89.
- Borgatti, S. P., Mehra, A., Brass, D. J., & Labianca, G. (2009). Network analysis in the social sciences. Science, 323(5916), 892-895.
- Boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210-230.
- Brad, S. (2019). Demoji. Project description.
- Brandes, U., Freeman, L. C., & Wagner, D. (2013). Social networks. In R. Tamassia (Ed.), Handbook of graph drawing and visualization (pp. 805-839). London: Chapman & Hall.
- Bródka, P., Skibicki, K., Kazienko, P., & Musiał, K. (2011). A degree centrality in multi-layered social network. 2011 International conference on computational aspects of social networks (CASoN) (pp. 237-242). IEEE.
- Chang, V. (2018). A proposed social network analysis platform for big data analytics. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 130, 57-68.
- Che, X., & Ip, B. (2017). Social networks in China. Chandos Publishing.
- Dickerson, J. P., Kagan, V., & Subrahmanian, V. S. (2014). Using sentiment to detect bots on Twitter: Are humans more opinionated than bots? 2014 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM 2014) (pp. 620-627). IEEE.
- García-Galera, M. C., Del-Hoyo-Hurtado, M., & Fernández-Muñoz, C. (2014). Engaged youth in the Internet: The role of social networks in social active participation. Comunicar: Revista Científica Iberoamericana de Comunicación y Educación, 43(2), 35-43.
- Gartner. (2023). The state of marketing budget and strategy 2022. Insights from Gartner’s annual CMO spend survey.
- Gill, S. S., Tuli, S., Xu, M., Singh, I., Singh, K. V., Lindsay, D., Tuli, S., Smirnova, D., Singh, M., Jain, U., Pervaiz, H., Sehgal, B., Kaila, S. S., Misra, S., Aslanpour, M. S., Mehta, H., Stankovski, V., & Garraghan, P. (2019). Transformative effects of IoT, Blockchain and Artificial Intelligence on cloud computing: Evolution, vision, trends and open challenges. Internet of Things, 8, Article 100118.
- Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360-1380.
- Gutiérrez-Batista, K., Campaña, J., Martinez-Folgoso, S., Vila, M., & Martin-Bautista, M. (2016). About the effects of sentiments on topic detection in social networks. International Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics, 11(3), 387-395.
- Hariri, R. H., Fredericks, E. M., & Bowers, K. M. (2019). Uncertainty in big data analytics: Survey, opportunities, and challenges. Journal of Big Data, 6(1), Article 44.
- Hootsuite Inc. (2022). Social media trends 2022.
- Huq, M. R., Ali, A., & Rahman, A. (2017). Sentiment analysis on Twitter data using KNN and SVM. (IJACSA) International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 8(6), 19-25.
- IAB Spain. (2021). Estudio de redes sociales 2021 [Social media study 2021]. (In Spanish).
- Isaak, J., & Hanna, M. J. (2018). User data privacy: Facebook, Cambridge Analytica, and privacy protection. Computer, 51(8), 56-59.
- Kim, D., & Ellison, N. (2022). From observation on social media to offline political participation: The social media affordances approach. New Media & Society, 24(12), 2614-2634.
- Kim, S. M., & Hovy, E. (2006). Automatic identification of pro and con reasons in online reviews. Proceedings of the COLING/ACL Main Conference Poster Sessions (pp. 483-490).
- Ku, L.W., Lee, L.Y., Wu, T.H., & Chen, H. H. (2005). Major topic detection and its application to opinion summarization. Proceedings of the ACM Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval (SIGIR) (pp. 627-628). Salvador, Brazil.
- Kumar, A., Sangwan, S. R., & Nayyar, A. (2020). Multimedia social big data: Mining. In Multimedia big data computing for IoT applications (pp. 289-321). Singapore: Springer.
- Lee, Y., & Kim, K. H. (2021). Enhancing employee advocacy on social media: The value of internal relationship management approach. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 26(2), 311-327.
- Micu, A., Micu, A. E., Geru, M., & Lixăndroiu, R. C. (2017). Analyzing user sentiment in social media: Implications for online marketing strategy. Psychology & Marketing, 34(12), 1094-1100.
- Milgram, S. (1967). The small-world problem. Psychology Today, 1(1), 61-67.
- Molu, F., Findik, N., & Dalci, M. (2014). Enhancing user experience in financial services. International Journal of E-Services and Mobile Applications, 6(2), 12-22.
- Moreno, J. L. (1953). Who shall survive? Foundations of sociometry, group psychotherapy and socio-drama (2nd ed.). Beacon House.
- Moreno, J. L. (1955). The sociometric school and the science of man. Sociometry, 18(4), 15-35.
- Nieto, B. G. (2013). Nuevos espacios comunicativos para las organizaciones: Las redes sociales [New communicative spaces for the organizations: The social networks]. Historia y Comunicación Social, 18, 731-741. (In Spanish).
- Niu, Y., Zhu, X., Li, J., & Hirst, G. (2005). Analysis of polarity information in medical text. Proceedings of the American Medical Informatics Association 2005 Annual Symposium (pp. 570-574).
- Nouwens, M., Griggio, C. F., & Mackay, W. E. (2017). “WhatsApp is for family; Messenger is for friends:” Communication places in app ecosystems. Proceedings of the 2017 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 727-735).
- Okamoto, K., Chen, W., & Li, X. Y. (2008). Ranking of closeness centrality for large-scale social networks. In International workshop on frontiers in algorithmics (pp. 186-195). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
- Ozili, P. K., & Nañez Alonso, S. L. (2024). Central bank digital currency adoption challenges, solutions, and a sentiment analysis. Journal of Central Banking Theory and Practice, 13(1), 133-165.
- Piatak, J., & Mikkelsen, I. (2021). Does social media engagement translate to civic engagement offline? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 50(5), 1079-1101.
- Rossmann, A. (2018). Digital maturity: Conceptualization and measurement model. Thirty Ninth International Conference on Information Systems. San Francisco, CA, USA.
- Singh, J., Singh, G., & Singh, R. (2017). Optimization of sentiment analysis using machine learning classifiers. Human-centric Computing and Information Sciences, 7, Article 32.
- Stephenson, K., & Zelen, M. (1989). Rethinking centrality: Methods and examples. Social Networks, 11(1), 1-37.
- Sudha, M., & Sheena, K. (2020). Impact of influencers in consumer decision process: The fashion industry. Interdisciplinary Journal on Law, Social Sciences and Humanities, 1(2), 1-13.
- Sun, K., Wang, H., & Zhang, J. (2022). The impact factors of social media users’ forwarding behavior of Covid-19 vaccine topic: Based on empirical analysis of Chinese Weibo users. Frontiers in Public Health, 10.
- The Financial Brand. (2022). Social Media Trends for Q1 2022: Top Banks Losing Facebook Followers.
- Veissi, I. (2017). Influencer marketing on Instagram (Master’s Thesis). Haaga-Helia University of Applied Sciences.
- Wasserman, L., & Kass, R. E. (1995). A reference Bayesian test for nested hypotheses and its relationship to the Schwarz criterion. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90(431), 928-934.
- Williams, J. R. (2019). The use of online social networking sites to nurture and cultivate bonding social capital: A systematic review of the literature from 1997 to 2018. New Media & Society, 21(11-12), 2710-2729.
- Witten, I. H., Frank, E., & Hall, M. A. (2011). Data mining: Practical machine learning tools and techniques. Elsevier.
- Xu, J., Hu, Zh., Zou, Zh., Zou, J., Hu, X., Liu, L., & Zheng, L. (2020). Design of smart unstaffed retail shop based on IoT and artificial Intelligence. IEEE Access, 8, 147728-147737.
- Zhang, J., & Luo, Y. (2017). Degree centrality, betweenness centrality, and closeness centrality in social network. IProceedings of the 2017 2nd International Conference on Modelling, Simulation and Applied Mathematics (MSAM2017) (pp. 300-303). Atlantis Press.
-
-
Conceptualization
Luis Miguel Garay Gallastegui, Ricardo Reier Forradellas, Sergio Luis Náñez Alonso
-
Data curation
Luis Miguel Garay Gallastegui
-
Formal Analysis
Luis Miguel Garay Gallastegui, Ricardo Reier Forradellas, Sergio Luis Náñez Alonso
-
Investigation
Luis Miguel Garay Gallastegui, Ricardo Reier Forradellas, Sergio Luis Náñez Alonso
-
Methodology
Luis Miguel Garay Gallastegui, Ricardo Reier Forradellas, Sergio Luis Náñez Alonso
-
Software
Luis Miguel Garay Gallastegui
-
Supervision
Luis Miguel Garay Gallastegui, Ricardo Reier Forradellas, Sergio Luis Náñez Alonso
-
Validation
Luis Miguel Garay Gallastegui, Ricardo Reier Forradellas, Sergio Luis Náñez Alonso
-
Writing – original draft
Luis Miguel Garay Gallastegui, Ricardo Reier Forradellas, Sergio Luis Náñez Alonso
-
Writing – review & editing
Luis Miguel Garay Gallastegui, Ricardo Reier Forradellas, Sergio Luis Náñez Alonso
-
Conceptualization
-
Fintech in the eyes of Millennials and Generation Z (the financial behavior and Fintech perception)
Mohannad A. M. Abu Daqar , Samer Arqawi , Sharif Abu Karsh doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/bbs.15(3).2020.03Banks and Bank Systems Volume 15, 2020 Issue #3 pp. 20-28 Views: 6424 Downloads: 2155 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯThis study investigates the Millennials and Gen Z perception toward Fintech services, their usage intention, and their financial behavior. The study took place in the Palestinian context with a global comparison among these generations. The authors used the questionnaire-based technique to meet the study objective. West Bank respondents were selected for this purpose; the study instrument was distributed through different social media channels. The findings show that reliability/trust and ease of use are the main issues in using a financial service. Millennials are more aware (48%) of Fintech services than Gen Z (38%), which is different from the global view where Gen Z is the highest. The smartphone penetration rate is 100% among both generations, while the financial inclusion ratio in Palestine is around 36.4%; these clear indicators are the main Fintech drivers to promote Fintech services in Palestine, and these are global indicators for Fintech adoption intention. Both generations (84%) intend to use e-wallet services, Millennials (87%) and Gen Z is (70%) prefer using real-time services. Half of the respondents see that Fintech plays a complementary role with banks. The majority see that Fintech services are cheaper than bank services. Wealth management, and robot advisor services, and both generations are looking to acquire them in the long run. The authors revealed that 85% of respondents from both generations trust banks, so it is recommended that banks digitize their financial services to meet the customers’ needs, considering that 90% of respondents see that promotions are a key issue in adopting Fintech services. Promoting e-wallet services by banks is highly recommended due to the massive rivalry with Fintech parties.
-
Embracing AI and Big Data in customer journey mapping: from literature review to a theoretical framework
Mario D'Arco , Letizia Lo Presti , Vittoria Marino , Riccardo Resciniti doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/im.15(4).2019.09Innovative Marketing Volume 15, 2019 Issue #4 pp. 102-115 Views: 3007 Downloads: 1705 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯNowadays, Big Data and Artificial Intelligence (AI) play an important role in different functional areas of marketing. Starting from this assumption, the main objective of this theoretical paper is to better understand the relationship between Big Data, AI, and customer journey mapping. For this purpose, the authors revised the extant literature on the impact of Big Data and AI on marketing practices to illustrate how such data analytics tools can increase the marketing performance and reduce the complexity of the pattern of consumer activity. The results of this research offer some interesting ideas for marketing managers. The proposed Big Data and AI framework to explore and manage the customer journey illustrates how the combined use of Big Data and AI analytics tools can offer effective support to decision-making systems and reduce the risk of bad marketing decision. Specifically, the authors suggest ten main areas of application of Big Data and AI technologies concerning the customer journey mapping. Each one supports a specific task, such as (1) customer profiling; (2) promotion strategy; (3) client acquisition; (4) ad targeting; (5) demand forecasting; (6) pricing strategy; (7) purchase history; (8) predictive analytics; (9) monitor consumer sentiments; and (10) customer relationship management (CRM) activities.
-
The impact of artificial intelligence on commercial management
Renato Costa , Álvaro Dias , Leandro Pereira , José Santos , André Capelo doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.17(4).2019.36Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 17, 2019 Issue #4 pp. 441-452 Views: 1788 Downloads: 332 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯThe essence of this research is to shed light on use and importance of artificial intelligence (AI) in commercial activity. As such, the objective of the present study is to understand the impact of AI tools on the development of business functions and if they can be affirmed as a means of help or as a substitute for these functions. In-depth interviews were conducted with 15 commercial managers from technological SMEs. The results indicate that all the participants use AI systems frequently, that these tools assist in developing of their functions, allowing having more time and better preparing to solve the commercial problems. The findings also indicate that the tools used by commercials are still somewhat limited, and companies should focus on their training and development in AI, as well as the training of their commercials. Furthermore, the results show that firms intend to use the data collection and the analytical tool that enable real-time response and customization according to customer needs.