An investigation into the best approach to the implementation of Basel II in Swaziland
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/bbs.12(4-1).2017.02
-
Article InfoVolume 12 2017, Issue #4, pp. 131-143
- 1013 Views
-
187 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
After the exposition of the Basel I Capital Accord weaknesses, the advent of the Basel II Capital Framework profoundly redefined global banking regulation and risk management practices. Many African countries had been lethargic on the migration to Basel for various reasons, amongst many being lack of skills and infrastructure. The purpose of this study was to investigate the prospect of migrating from the 1988 Basel I Capital Accord to the Basel II Capital Framework and to analyze the best approach to the implementation of the new framework in Swaziland. This was a qualitative study conducted using semi-structured interview among risk managers from the four banks operated in Swaziland. The researchers also analyzed internal regulatory documents to determine their suitability and compliance to the Basel II standards. The results showed that the adoption and implementation of Basel II are a complex and resource intensive undertaking that requires strong commitment from policy decision makers. The complex models used in the later Basel capital accords have the potential to be unattainable for emerging economies, while the risk of doing business is ever increasing with exotic banking products being introduced. Background work remains the daunting outstanding undertaking that the Central Bank must get ready to do and complete timeously and efficiently. Implementation prerequisites include aligning supervision practices with the 29 Basel Core Principles for Effective Banking Supervision, revising the current legislation to address existing regulatory weaknesses and recruiting and training human resources for efficient and effective rollout.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)G20, G21, MIO, Ml2, L21
-
References21
-
Tables4
-
Figures3
-
- Figure 1. Basel II architecture
- Figure 2. Swaziland banking industry by total assets, total advances, total deposits and total capital
- Figure 3. Industry capital adequacy levels
-
- Table 1. Assessment of the current regulatory framework
- Table 2. Institutional awareness
- Table 3. Pillar 1: credit risk and operational risk
- Table 4. Basel II compliant policies
-
- Ahmed, S. U., Ahmed, S. U., Islam, M. N., & Ullah, G. M. W. (2015). Impact of Basel II Implementation on the Financial Performance of Private Commercial Banks of Bangladesh. European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences, 77, 73-83.
- BCBS (2006). International Convergence of Capital Measurement and Capital Standards: a revised framework.
- BCBS (2014). A brief history of the Basel Committee.
- BOM (2012). Bank of Mauritius Annual Report. Port Louis: Bank of Mauritius.
- Caruana, J., & Narain, A. (2008). Banking on More Capital Finance and Development. Washington: IMF.
- Cho, Y. B. (2013). Why do countries implement Basel II? Doctor of Philosophy Research, the London School of Economics and Political Science.
- Cihak, M., Demiguc-Kent, A., Peria, M. S. M., & Mohseni-Cheraghlou, A. (2012). Bank regulation and supervision around the World: A crisis update. Research Working Paper series. Washington: World Bank.
- Ermolova, M. D., & Penikas, H. I. (2017). Basel regulation: A dangerous obsession. Model Assisted Statistics and Applications, 12(1), 63-88.
- Goodhart, C. (2011). The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. A History of the Early Years 1974–1997. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. ISBN 9781107007239.
- Hossain, E., Ferdous, J., & Farzana, N. (2012). Some Imperative Issues and Challenges in Implementing Basel II for Developing Economies with Special Reference to Bangladesh. International Journal of Latest Trends in Finance & Economic Sciences, 4(2), 298-304.
- IMF & WorldBank (2005). Implementation of Basel II – Implications for the World Bank and the IMF.
- IMF (2002). Implementation of the Basel Core Principles for Effective Supervision, Experiences, Influences, and Perspectives.
- Jacobs, J. (2013). Lessons learnt from the deficiencies of the Basel Accords as they apply to Solvency II. Philosophiae Doctor in Risk Management, North-West University.
- Laas, D., & Siegel, D. C. (2014). Basel Accords versus Solvency II – Regulatory Adequacy and Consistency under the Post-Crisis Capital Standards. Seminar on Regulation and Risk systems. St. Gallen: Institute of Insurance Economics, University of St. Gallen, Switzerland.
- Marshall, E. (2005). Implementation of Basel II in Developing Countries: The Case of Chile. International Conference On “Financial System Stability and Implications of Basel II. Istanbul: Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey.
- Neethling, S. B. (2014). Empirical evidence of aggregate credit supply by South African banks since the introduction of international risk based capital regulation. Master of Financial Management, University of Capetown.
- Ojo, M. (2009). Basel II and the Capital Requirements Directive: Responding to the 2008/09 Financial Crisis. Retrieved from https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/17379/
- Pasha, M. A., Srivenkataramana, T., & Swamy, K. (2012). Basel II norms with special emphasis on capital adequacy ratio of Indian Banks. A Journal of MP Birla Institute of Management, 6(1), 23-40.
- Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2013). Research methods for business: a skill-building approach (6th ed.). Chichester, Wiley. ISBN: 978-1-119-94225-2.
- Teply, P. (2010). The Key Challenges of the New Bank Regulations. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology 42, 1477-1480.
- Tustin, D. H., Ligthelm, A., Martins, J. H., & Van Wyk, H. de J. (2010). Marketing Research in Practice. Pretoria: Unisa Press.