Accounting support for sustainability reporting: theoretical foundations and bibliometric analysis
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/afc.04(1).2023.01
-
Article InfoVolume 4 2022-2023, Issue #1, pp. 1-13
- Cited by
- 442 Views
-
127 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
The purpose of this study is to substantiate the theoretical provisions on the accounting support for sustainability reporting and develop practical recommendations for improving the mechanisms for generating fragments of non-financial reporting based on accounting data. The study is conducted on the example of Ukraine. The paper provides a bibliometric analysis of scientific publications on the reporting in the field of sustainable development. Generalizing the results of the content-context block of the bibliometric analysis allowed identifying seven clusters. In the context of the study, the most relevant is the fourth cluster, which reflects the relationship between sustainability reporting and accounting. To create an effective mechanism for building sustainability reporting, a five-step sequence of actions based on accounting data was proposed, and tables were created to simplify the search for the necessary information to fill out fragments of a sustainability report and assess social and environmental security based on accounting data.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)М41, М48, Q01
-
References23
-
Tables3
-
Figures5
-
- Figure 1. Dynamics of published articles for 1991–2022 for the search query “sustainability reporting AND accounting”, the number of articles
- Figure 2. Structural analysis of the concept of “sustainability reporting” by subject area
- Figure 3. Defining the relationship between “sustainability reporting” and other concepts
- Figure 4. Visualization map of the context-time dimension of research on “sustainability reporting” published in the editions of the Scopus database
- Figure 5. Spatial component of the bibliometric analysis of the concepts “sustainability reporting” and “accounting”
-
- Table 1. Characterization of bibliographic clusters based on the analysis of interconnection identification using VOSviewer
- Table 2. Accounting support to generate a fragment of sustainability reporting: the social component
- Table 3. Accounting support to generate a fragment of sustainability reporting: the environmental component
-
- 2021 Environmental Sustainability Report. (n.d.).
- Baryshnikova, O. M. (2016). Mekhanizm formuvannia ta oblikove zabezpechennia ekolohichnoi skladovoi zvitnosti zi staloho rozvytku [The mechanism of formation and accounting of the environmental component of sustainable development reporting]. Problems of the theory and methodology of accounting, control and analysis. International collection of scientific papers. Series: Accounting, control and analysis, 2-3(35-36), 3-26. Zhytomyr: ZhDTU. (In Ukrainian).
- Baryshnikova, O. M. (2016a). Mekhanizm formuvannia ta oblikove zabezpechennia ekonomichnoi skladovoi zvitnosti zi staloho rozvytku [The mechanism of formation and accounting of the economic component of sustainable development reporting]. Economy: Realities of Time. Scientific Journal, 3(25). (In Ukrainian).
- Cavagnetto, S., Makarenko, I., Brož, V., Rivera, L., & Filatova, H. (2022). The sustainability transparency index of sovereign wealth funds: Their asset size, SDG country rankings and cross-region comparison. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 19(4), 218-231.
- Deineko, L., Sychevskiy, M., Tsyplitska, O., Grebeniuk , N. and Deineko, O. (2021). Increasing resource efficiency in the industrial complex ensuring environmental human rights. Environmental Economics, 12(1), 124-139.
- Environmental Progress Report. (2020).
- Global Reporting Initiative. (n.d.). The global standards for sustainability impacts: Directive.
- Gray, R. (2010). Is accounting for sustainability actually accounting for sustainability...and how would we know? an exploration of narratives of organizations and the planet. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(1), 47-62.
- GRI. (2022). Four-in-five largest global companies report with GRI. The KPMG Survey of Sustainability Reporting 2022.
- Hahn, R., & Kühnen, M. (2013). Determinants of sustainability reporting: A review of results, trends, theory, and opportunities in an expanding field of research. Journal of Cleaner Production, 59, 5-21.
- Lodhia, S., & Hess, N. (2014). Sustainability accounting and reporting in the mining industry: Current literature and directions for future research. Journal of Cleaner Production, 84(1), 43-50.
- Maama, H. & Gani, S. (2022). Determinants of sustainability reporting: Empirical evidence from East African Countries. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 20(2), 564-574.
- Maas, K., Schaltegger, S., & Crutzen, N. (2016). Integrating corporate sustainability assessment, management accounting, control, and reporting. Journal of Cleaner Production, 136, 237-248.
- Makarenko, I. O. (2016). Sustainability reporting: a perspective for stakeholder decision-making, challenges for presenting in an integrated format. Economic Journal of the Lesya Ukrainka Eastern European National University, 4, 49-54.
- Makarenko, I., Sukhonos, V., Zhuravlyova, I.V., Legenchuk, S. and Szołno, O. (2020). Sustainability reporting assessment for quality and compliance: the case of Ukrainian banks’ management reports. Banks and Bank Systems, 15(2), 117-129.
- Moskaluk, G. O. (2014). Nefinansova zvitnist u realizatsii kontseptsii staloho rozvytku v Ukraini [Nonfinancial reporting in the implementation of the concept of sustainable development in Ukraine] (pp. 323-373). Odesa: ONEU. (In Ukrainian).
- Nesterenko, O. O. (2018). Metodolohiia ta orhanizatsiia formuvannia intehrovanoi zvitnosti: avtoreferat na zdobuttia naukovoho stupenia doktora ekon. nauk: spets. 08.00.09 [Methodology and organization of the formation of integrated reporting: abstract for obtaining the scientific degree of Doctor of Economic Sciences: specialty 08.00.09] (40 p.). Kharkiv. (In Ukrainian).
- Pasko, O., Chen, F., Kuts, T., Sharko, I., & Ryzhikova, N. (2022). Sustainability reporting nexus to corporate governance in scholarly literature. Environmental Economics, 13(1), 61-78.
- Pasko, O., Zhang, L., Tuzhyk, K., Proskurina, N. & Viktoriia Gryn (2021). Do sustainability reporting conduct and corporate governance attributes relate? Empirical evidence from China. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 19(4), 110-123.
- Pro Bono Club Ukraine. (2020). Druhyi kataloh KSV-Initsiatyv [The second catalog of CSR initiatives] (207 p.).
- Sokil, O. H. (2018). Teoretyko-metodolohichni zasady bukhhalterskoho obliku staloho rozvytku silskohospodarskykh pidpryiemstv [Theoretical and methodological principles of accounting for the sustainable development of agricultural enterprises] (454 p.). Melitopol: TOV Kolor Prynt. (In Ukrainian).
- Tommasetti, A., Mussari, R., Maione, G., & Sorrentino, D. (2020). Sustainability accounting and reporting in the public sector: Towards public value co-creation? Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(5)ю
- Vasilchuk, I. P. (2015). Nefinansova zvitnist yak instrument upravlinnia stalym rozvytkom korporatsii [Non-financial reporting as a management tool for the sustainable development of corporations]. Scientific Bulletin of the International Humanitarian University. Series: Economics and management, 11, 212-215. (In Ukrainian).