A second chance to serve South African private banking consumers: the role of post-transgression forgiveness

  • Received May 16, 2017;
    Accepted August 11, 2017;
    Published October 4, 2017
  • Author(s)
    Nobukhosi Dlodlo
  • DOI
    http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/bbs.12(3-1).2017.02
  • Article Info
    Volume 12 2017, Issue #3, pp. 166-178
  • TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ
  • Cited by
    3 articles
  • 991 Views
  • 182 Downloads

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

While service failure is inevitable in the banking sector, the manner in which service recovery efforts are expedited poses vital implications for organizations vested in profitable relationships with their clients. In this vein, this study investigates the significance of post-transgression forgiveness in defining the resultant satisfaction levels of customers. A structured questionnaire was self-administered among 371 premium banking customers. The findings point to the salience of selected service recovery efforts towards the forgiveness inclinations and ultimate satisfaction levels of banking customers. In particular, both bank reciprocity norms (ß=0.459; p<0.000) and extra-role behavior (ß=0.348; p<0.000) positively influence post-transgression forgiveness by customers. On the other hand, extra-role behavior (ß=0.407; p<0.000) and forgiveness (ß=0.373; p<0.000) positively influence bank service satisfaction. Nevertheless, bank reciprocity was found to have a positive influence on extra-role behavior (ß=0.548; p<0.000) in this study. The findings suggest the need for the development of a prescribed set of guidelines and bank procedures to support personalized service recovery efforts in the wake of service failures.

view full abstract hide full abstract
    • Figure 1. Inner model results
    • Table 1. Outer model results
    • Table 2. Pearson correlation analysis results and descriptive measures
    • Table 3. Inner model results
    • Aaker, J., Fournier, S., & Brasel, A. S. (2004). When good brands do bad. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(1), 1-16.
    • Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modelling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach, Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411-423.
    • Arnett, D. B., German, S. D., & Hunt, S. D. (2003). The identity salience model of relationship marketing success: The case of non-profit marketing. Journal of Marketing, 67(2), 89-105.
    • Bagozzi, R. P. (1995). Reflections on relationship marketing in consumer markets. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 23, 272.
    • Banking Association of South Africa (2012). South African banking industry overview.
    • Berry, L. L. (1995). Relationship marketing of services- growing interest, emerging perspectives. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 23(4), 236-245.
    • Berry, L. L., Zeithaml, V. A., & Parasuraman, A. (1990). Five imperatives for improving service quality. Sloan Management Review, 31(4), 29-38.
    • Beverland, M. B., Kates, S. M., Lindgreen, A., & Chung, E. (2010). Exploring consumer conflict management in service encounters. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 83, 617-633.
    • Bolton, R. N., & Drew, J. H. (1991). A multistage model of customers’ assessments of service quality and value. Journal of Consumer Research, 17(4), 375-384.
    • Briggs, E., & Grisaffe, D. (2010). Service performance-loyalty intentions link in a B2B context: The role of relational exchange outcomes and customer characteristics. Journal of Service Research, 13(1), 37-51.
    • Buttle, F., & Burton, J. (2002). Does service failure influence customer loyalty? Journal of Consumer Behavior, 1(3), 217-227.
    • Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modelling. In Marcoulides, G.A. (Ed.), Modern methods for business research (pp. 295-336). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.
    • Chung, E., & Beverland, M. (2006). An exploration of consumer forgiveness following marketer transgression. Advance in Consumer Research, 33, 98-99.
    • Coetzee, J., Van Zyl, H., & Tait, M. (2013). Perceptions of service quality by clients and contact-personnel in the South African retail-banking sector. Southern African Business Review, 17(1), 1-22.
    • Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 6, 874-900.
    • Duffy, J. A. M., Miller, J. M., & Bexley, J. B. (2006). Banking customers’ varied reactions to service recovery strategies. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 24(2), 112-132.
    • Egan, J. (2011). Relationship marketing: Exploring relational strategies in marketing (4th ed.). Harlow: Prentice Hall.
    • Fang, Z., Luo, X., & Jiang, M. (2013). Quantifying the dynamic effects of service recovery on customer satisfaction: Evidence from Chinese mobile phone markets. Journal of Service Research, 16(3), 341-355.
    • Fornell, C. (1992). A national customer satisfaction barometer: The Swedish experience. Journal of Marketing, 56, 6-21.
    • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement errors. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(February), 39-50.
    • Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement, American Sociological Review, 25(2), 61-178.
    • Grégoire, Y., Tripp, T. M., & Legoux, R. (2009). When customer love turns into lasting hate: The effects of relationship strength and time on customer revenge and avoidance. Journal of Marketing, 73(6), 18-32.
    • Gremler, D. D., & Gwinner, K. P. (2000). Customer-employee rapport in service relationships. Journal of Services Research, 3, 82-104.
    • Hair, J. F. (Jr)., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). New York, USA: Prentice-Hall.
    • Hair, J. F., Wolfinbarger Celsi, M., Oritinau, D. J., & Bush, R. P. (2013). Essentials of marketing research (3rd international ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.
    • Hart, C. W. L., Heskett, J. L., & Sasser, W. E. Jr. (1990). The profitable art of service recovery. Harvard Business Review, 68(July/August), 148-157.
    • Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modelling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135.
    • Howley, M. J., Ward, J. C., & Brown, S. W. (2008). The forgiveness processes of very dissatisfied customers.
    • Imeson, M. (2010). Eyes on the prize.
    • Joireman, J. Grégoire, Y., & Tripp, T. M. (2016). Customer forgiveness following service failures. Current Opinion in Psychology, 10(1), 76-82.
    • Lewis, B. R., & Spyrakopoulos, S. (2001). Service failures and recovery in retail banking: The customers’ perspective. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 19(1), 37-47.
    • Magnini, V., Ford, J., Markowski, E., & Honeycutt, E. (2007). The service recovery paradox: Justifiable theory or smoldering myth? Journal of Services Marketing, 21(3), 213-25.
    • Maxham, J. G. I., & Netemeyer, R. G. (2002). A longitudinal study of complaining customers’ evaluations of multiple service failures and recovery efforts. Journal of Marketing, 66(4), 57-71.
    • McCullough, M. A., Berry, L. L. & Yadav, M. S. (2000). An empirical investigation of customer satisfaction after service failure and recovery. Journal of Service Research, 3(2), 121-137.
    • McCullough, M. E., Fincham, F. D., & Tsang, J. A. (2003). Forgiveness, forbearance and time: The temporal unfolding of transgression-related interpersonal motivations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(3), 540-557.
    • McCullough, M., & Bharadwaj, S. (1992). The recovery paradox: an examination of customer satisfaction in relation to disconfirmation, service quality, and attribution based theories. In Allen, C. (Ed.), Marketing Theory and Applications, American Marketing Association, Chicago, IL.
    • McCullough, M. E., Worthington, E. L. Jr., & Rachal, K. C. (1997). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships. Journal of Personal Social Psychology, 73, 21-336
    • Michel, S. (2004). Consequences of perceived acceptability of a bank’s service failures. Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 8(4), 367-377.
    • Moschis, G. P. (2007). Stress and consumer behavior. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 35(3), 430-444.
    • Nikbin, D., Ismail, I., Marimuthu, M., & Abu-Jarad, I. Y. (2011). The impact of firm reputation on customers’ responses to service failure: The role of failure attributions. Business Strategy Series, 12(1), 19-29.
    • Noth, A. C., Jaroenwanit, P., & Brown, R. (2015). The roles of forgiveness towards repurchase intentions from a cross-cultural perspective. Athens: ATINER’S Conference Paper Series, No: MKT2014-1364.
    • Palmer, A. (2001). Principles of services marketing (3rd ed.). Singapore: McGraw-Hill.
    • Perrien, J., Filiatrault, P., & Ricard, L. (1993). The implementation of relationship marketing in commercial banking. Industrial Marketing Management, 22, 141-148.
    • Petzer, D. J., & Mostert, P. G. (2012). Attitude towards and likelihood of complaining in the banking, domestic airline and restaurant industries. Southern African Business Review, 16(2), 1-23.
    • Rafaeli, A., Ziklik, L., & Doucet, L. (2008). The impact of call center employees’ customer orientation behavior on customer satisfaction. Journal of Services Research, 10, 239-255.
    • Richardson, A. (1962). A theological wordbook of the bible. Michigan: MacMillan Publishing Company.
    • Siddiqui, M. H., & Tripathi, S. N. (2010). An analytical study of complaining attitudes: With reference to the banking sector. Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing, 18(2), 119-137.
    • Sivakumar, K., Li, M., & Dong, B. (2014). Service quality: The impact of frequency, timing, proximity and sequence of failures and delights. Journal of Marketing, 78(1), 41-58.
    • Smith, A. K., & Bolton, R. N. (1998). An experimental investigation of customer reactions to service failure and recovery encounters: Paradox or peril? Journal of Service Research, 1(1), 65-81.
    • Smith, A. K., Bolton, R. U. & Wagner, J. (1999). A model of customer satisfaction with service encounters involving failure and recovery. Journal of Market Research, 36, 356-372.
    • Tsarenko, Y., & Tojib, D. R. (2011). A transactional model of forgiveness in the service failure context: A customer-driven approach. Journal of Services Marketing, 25(5), 381-392.
    • Tsarenko, Y., & Tojib, D. (2012). The role of personality characteristics and service failure severity in consumer forgiveness and service outcomes. Journal of Marketing Management, 28(9/10), 1217-1239.
    • Van Niekerk, L. (2012). South Africa yearbook 2011/12 – Communications.
    • Wong, K. K-K. (2013). Partial least squares structural equation (PLS-SEM) techniques using SmartPLS. Marketing Bulletin, 24, Technical Note 1, 1-32.
    • Xie, Y., & Peng, S. (2009). How to repair customer trust after negative publicity: The roles of competence, integrity, benevolence and forgiveness. Psychology Marketing, 26(7), 572-589.
    • Zourrig, H., Chebat, J-C., & Toffoli, R. (2009). Consumer revenge behavior: A cross-cultural perspective. Journal of Business Research, 62(10), 995-1001.
    • Zourrig, H., Chebat, J-C., & Toffoli, R. (2015). In-group love and out-group hate? A cross-cultural study on customers’ revenge, avoidance and forgiveness behavior. Journal of Business Research, 68(3), 487-499.
Related Articles

  • Factors affecting service quality at Vietnamese retail banks

    Tran Phi HoangORCID doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/bbs.13(2).2018.04
    Banks and Bank Systems Volume 13, 2018         Issue #2         pp. 39-48 Views: 6457 Downloads: 1373 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ

    Sustainable growth and development can be the most important lesson that banks have learned in recent decades. Banks would gain many benefits, win the competition and develop sustainably if there have been more and more loyal customers. Customer satisfaction will help build customer loyalty. In order to have loyal customers, service quality must be good. Quality customer service of the bank is to ensure customer satisfaction and take their needs into consideration to improve service quality. High customer service quality will generate value not only to meet customer needs but also the expectations of customers and make banks more prominent than their competitors. This study identifies factors that affect customer satisfaction with the service quality at Vietnamese retail banks. The results are obtained by qualitative and quantitative method. The research model with a questionnaire consisting of 22 variables, 5 scales for a survey of 554 customers, is identified and developed through interviews with experts and group discussions. The findings show that customer satisfaction with the service quality at retail banks is influenced by “reliability”, “responsiveness”, “empathy”, “security”, and “tangibles”. Based on the findings, solutions for improving service quality are proposed for Vietnamese retail banks.

  • Perceived health risk, online retail ethics, and consumer behavior within online shopping during the COVID-19 pandemic

    Yuniarti FihartiniORCID , Arief HelmiORCID , Meydia HassanORCID , Yevis Marty OesmanORCID doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/im.17(3).2021.02
    Innovative Marketing Volume 17, 2021         Issue #3         pp. 17-29 Views: 4454 Downloads: 1707 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ

    The risk of virus contracting during the COVID-19 pandemic has changed consumer preference for online shopping to meet their daily needs than shopping in brick-and-mortar stores. Online shopping presents a different environment, atmosphere, and experience. The possibility of ethical violations is higher during online than face-to-face transactions. Therefore, this study was conducted to investigate the influence of perceived health risk and customer perception of online retail ethics on consumer online shopping behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic, involving seven variables, namely perceived health risk, security, privacy, non-deception, reliability fulfillment, service recovery, and online shopping behavior. The data were collected through an online survey by employing the purposive sampling technique to a consumer who has shopped online during the COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia. 315 valid responses were obtained and analyzed through quantitative method using SEM-Amos. The results showed that perceived health risk and four variables of online retail ethics including security, privacy, reliability fulfillment, and service recovery affected online shopping behavior. Meanwhile, non-deception was found to have an insignificant effect. The coefficient value proved perceived health risk to be more dominant in influencing online shopping behavior than the variables of online retail ethics. Thus, consumers pay more concern for their health during online shopping. However, positive consumer perceptions of the behavior of online retail websites in providing services also can encourage consumers to shop online during this pandemic.

  • The growth strategies of a global pharmaceutical company: a case study of Aspen Pharmacare Holdings Limited

    Victoria Margaret Hodgon , Muhammad Ehsanul Hoque doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.15(1-1).2017.12
    Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 15, 2017         Issue #1 (cont.)         pp. 248-259 Views: 2868 Downloads: 3148 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ

    Given the rapid and sustained growth of Aspen over the past decade, the main aim of this study is to identify and analyze the growth strategies, adopted by Aspen over the period from 2004 to 2014. The research method used was a descriptive study through a single case study of Aspen by analyzing secondary data in the form of publicly available company reports and presentations, as well as financial results, issued between 2004 and 2014. The study finds that, guided by strategic and visionary leadership, Aspen adopted a number of growth strategies including (i) organic growth, as a key factor in creating incremental value for Aspen and its stakeholders, (ii) inorganic growth, in the form of carefully planned and well executed acquisitions, aligned to the Group strategy, (iii) extending territorial coverage through global expansion, particularly into emerging pharmaceutical countries, and (iv) ongoing investment in production capabilities as a means of achieving a strategic advantage. Despite the challenges of intense competition, restrictive legislation, pressure on medicine prices, currency volatility and market specific risks, Aspen has delivered double-digit earnings growth to its shareholders for 16 consecutive years.

Download Preview
Close
Banks and Bank Systems
Banks and Bank Systems