The innovation paradox: Institutional drivers and capability orchestration in Vietnamese enterprises
-
Author(s)Hoa Huu CuongLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0009-0003-1378-6380
,
Ly Thu CucLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-2087-9669
,
Nguyen Van PhuongLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2877-094X
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.24(3).2026.39
-
Article InfoVolume 24 2026, Issue #3, pp. 627–645
- 36 Views
-
4 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Type of the article: Research Article
Abstract
Enterprises serve as the primary innovation engine in transition economies yet face significant institutional challenges. The purpose of this study is to investigate the “innovation paradox” in enterprises within a transition economy by analyzing the shift from reliance on passive subsidies (government support) to capability orchestration (absorptive capacity and internal readiness) in determining innovation performance. Grounded in the functional national innovation system and resource-based view, this paper relies primarily on a cross-sectional survey. Data were collected from November 2025 to January 2026 through direct and digital questionnaires administered to C-level executives and R&D managers from 240 enterprises across Hanoi, Da Nang, and Ho Chi Minh City. These key informants were selected for their strategic vantage point, ensuring high relevance in capturing diverse innovation modes. Using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM), the model explains 58.6% of the variance in innovation performance. Empirical results reveal a substantive implementation gap: internal R&D readiness is the strongest direct predictor of innovation performance (β = 0.410), and intermediary linkages significantly enhance outcomes through the partial mediation of absorptive capacity. Conversely, while direct government support marginally aids short-term output, it does not show a significant association with long-term absorptive capacity (β = 0.032). Consequently, policymakers should complement financial incentives by supporting intermediary networks, while managers must cultivate internal learning routines to exploit external knowledge.
Acknowledgment
This is the result of the national-level science and technology project entitled “Comparative Study of Best Practices in the Development of National Innovation Systems in Selected Transition Economies of the European Union and Lessons for Vietnam”, project code KX.07.04/21–30, under the KX07 Program of the Ministry of Science and Technology.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)O32, O38, P20
-
References58
-
Tables10
-
Figures2
-
- Figure 1. Proposed research model and hypothesized direct and indirect relationships
- Figure 2. Structural equation modeling results
-
- Table 1. Demographic profile of the sample (N = 240)
- Table 2. Measurement scales and sources
- Table 3. Measurement model assessment
- Table 4. Reliability and convergent validity
- Table 5. Discriminant validity assessment using Fornell–Larcker criterion
- Table 6. Discriminant validity – HTMT criterion
- Table 7. Model fit
- Table 8. Effect size matrix
- Table 9. Coefficient of determination (R²) and adjusted R²
- Table 10. Structural path coefficients
-
- Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
- Bozsik, N., Ngo, D. M., & Vasa, L. (2023). The effects of foreign direct investment on the performance of small-medium enterprises: The case of Vietnam. Journal of International Studies, 16(1).
- Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185-216.
- Chaminade, C., & Edquist, C. (2006). From theory to practice: The use of the systems of innovation approach in innovation policy. In J. Hage & M. Meeus (Eds.), Innovation, Science, and Institutional Change (pp. 141-160). Oxford University Press.
- Cirera, X., & Maloney, W.F. (2017). The innovation paradox: Developing-country capabilities and the unrealized promise of technological catch-up. World Bank Group.
- Cirera, X., Mason, A. D., Nicola, F. de, Kuriakose, S., Mare, D. S., & Tran, T. T. (2021). The innovation imperative for developing East Asia. World Bank Publications.
- Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128-152.
- Corral de Zubielqui, G., Lindsay, N., Lindsay, W., & Jones, J. (2019). Knowledge quality, innovation and firm performance: A study of knowledge transfer in SMEs. Small Business Economics, 53, 145-164.
- Cuong, H.H., Cuc, L.T., & Phuong, N.V. (2026). Survey questionnaire: The innovation paradox in SMEs in Vietnam [Data set]. Zenodo.
- Dang, T. T., & Tran, N. C. (2023). National innovation system and an approach to innovation activities at the scale of an economic sector: Some theoretical foundations. VNU Journal of Science: Policy and Management Studies, 39(4), 1-10.
- Doh, J., Rodrigues, S., Saka-Helmhout, A., & Makhija, M. (2017). International business responses to institutional voids. Journal of International Business Studies, 48(3), 293-307.
- Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. The Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660-679.
- Edquist, C. (2006). Systems of innovation: Perspectives and challenges. In J. Fagerberg & D. C. Mowery (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation (pp. 181-208). Oxford University Press.
- Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109-123.
- Flatten, T. C., Engelen, A., Zahra, S. A., & Brettel, M. (2011). A measure of absorptive capacity: Scale development and validation. European Management Journal, 29(2), 98-116.
- Galende, J., & de la Fuente, J. M. (2003). Internal factors determining a firm’s innovative behaviour. Research Policy, 32(5), 715-736.
- Gunday, G., Ulusoy, G., Kilic, K., & Alpkan, L. (2011). Effects of innovation types on firm performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 133(2), 662-676.
- Hair, J., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). Sage.
- Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24.
- Hakim, W., Hermansyah, F. I., Hakim, H., Andriyansah, Aryadi, A. R., & Irwansyah, N. S. (2026). Enabling routines for green innovation: Strategic management processes, entrepreneurial motivation, creativity, and work performance in Indonesian SMEs. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 24(1), 454-469.
- Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135.
- Hernesniemi, H. (2000). Evaluation of Estonian innovation system (Working Paper No. 722; ETLA Discussion Papers No. 722). ETLA Discussion Papers.
- Hien, T. T., Phuong, T. T., Huyen, V. T. M., McLean, G. N., & Ashwill, M. A. (2021). Human resource development in Vietnam. Research and practice. Springer Nature.
- Hu, L.-t., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.
- Huggins, R., Prokop, D., & Thompson, P. (2020). Universities and open innovation: The determinants of network centrality. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 45(3), 718-757.
- Indrawati, H., Caska, & Suarman. (2020). Barriers to technological innovations of SMEs: How to solve them? International Journal of Innovation Science, 12(5), 545-564.
- Istipliler, B., Bort, S., & Woywode, M. (2023). Flowers of adversity: Institutional constraints and innovative SMEs in transition economies. Journal of Business Research, 154, Article 113306.
- Jansen, J. J. P., Van Den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2006). Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management Science, 52(11), 1661-1674.
- Jumambayev, S., Halicka, K., Dzhulaeva, A., Ilyashova, G., & Dosmbek, A. (2025). Multivariate time series models of development for countries with transitional economies and prospects for post-COVID growth. E&M Economics and Management, 28(2), 1-24.
- Kalvet, T. (2009). Innovation policy and development in the ICT paradigm: Regional and theoretical perspectives (MPRA Paper 19387). University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Khalidi, R. (2023, December 6). Viet Nam, Technology and the Middle-Income Trap. UNDP.
- Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of E-Collaboration (IJeC), 11(4), 1-10.
- Le, T.-H., Mai, K. N., & Nguyen, P. N.-D. (2024). Driving SME growth and learning effectiveness: The role of analyzer orientation, learning capability, and innovation. Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Development, 8(8), Article 6908.
- Lundvall, B.-Å. (Ed.). (2010). National systems of innovation: Toward a theory of innovation and interactive learning. Anthem Press.
- Nelson, R. R. (Ed.). (1993). National innovation systems: A comparative analysis. Oxford University Press.
- Nguyet, N. T. (2022). SMES survival and knowledge in emerging economies: Evidence from Vietnam. Heliyon, 8(11).
- NIC. (2023). Vietnam Innovation & Tech Investment Report 2023. Vietnam National Innovation Center (NIC).
- Nieto, M. J., & Santamaría, L. (2007). The importance of diverse collaborative networks for the novelty of product innovation. Technovation, 27(6), 367-377.
- North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press.
- OECD. (2018). Oslo manual 2018: Guidelines for collecting, reporting and using data on innovation (4th ed.). OECD.
- Petković, S., Petrović, J., Bucevska, V., Radosavljevic, M., & Pojani, E. (2025). What drives successful sustainable technology transfer in emerging open innovation ecosystems: Insights from Southeast Europe. Management, 30, 121-155.
- Petti, C., Tuan, M. N. D., Phong, T. N., Thi, M. P., Huong, T. T., & Perumal, V. V. (2021). Technological catch-up and innovative entrepreneurship in Vietnamese firms. Administrative Sciences, 11(3).
- Phung, T. M. T., Tran, D. T., Vermeulen, P. A. M., & Knoben, J. (2021). The effects of internal and external innovation strategies on process innovation in Vietnamese firms. Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 15(1), 26-38.
- Phuong, N. V., Huong, T. T. T., & Quy, B. H. (2020). Successful agricultural cooperative model in Vietnam. A case study: Van Duc Co-operative. In Waking the Asian Pacific Co-Operative Potential (pp. 125-136). Academic Press.
- Phuong, N. V., Huyen, N. T. K., Ngoc, L. T. B., & Hung, P. M. (2025). Electronic word-of-mouth and changes in green food consumption behavior in Hanoi: From online reviews to actual purchasing behavior. Research on World Agricultural Economy, 6(3), 441-458.
- Quynh, P. N. H., My, D. T. T., Hoai, P. T. T., & Phuong, N. V. (2023). The influences of cultural values on consumers’ green purchase intention in South Korea. Journal of Society for Southeast Asian Agricultural Sciences, 29(1), 75-89.
- Rodrik, D., Subramanian, A., & Trebbi, F. (2002). Institutions rule: The primacy of institutions over integration and geography in economic development. Journal of Economic Growth, 9(2), 131-165.
- Samarkhanov, A., Junusbekova, G., Kenzhin, Z., & Yesmagambetov, D. (2025). The impact of socio-economic and political factors on the development of e-government in developed and developing countries. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 23(4), 554-565.
- Shmueli, G., Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Cheah, J.-H., Ting, H., Vaithilingam, S., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). Predictive model assessment in PLS-SEM: Guidelines for using PLSpredict. European Journal of Marketing, 53(11), 2322–2347.
- Tran, H. T., & Freel, M. (2023). Ownership, innovation, and variable institutional quality. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 31(2), 285-306.
- Tran, H. T., Santarelli, E., & Wei, W. X. (2022). Open innovation knowledge management in transition to market economy: Integrating dynamic capability and institutional theory. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 31(7), 575-603.
- Tran, Q. T., & Vu, V. H. (2018). The impact of government support on innovations of small and medium enterprises in Vietnam. VNU Journal of Economics and Business, 34(4), 9-16.
- Trang, N. M. (2023). Impacts of digital transformation on manufacture in Vietnam. VNU Journal of Science, 39(2).
- Trevor, M. (1989). Technology policy and economic performance. Lessons from Japan. R&D Management, 19(3), 278-279.
- WIPO. (2024). Global Innovation Index 2024: Unlocking the promise of social entrepreneurship (17th ed.).
- World Bank. (2022). Effective Policy Implementation is Crucial for Vietnam to Reach High-Income Status by 2045, World Bank Group Report Says. World Bank.
- Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. The Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185-203.
- Zúñiga-Vicente, J. Á., Alonso-Borrego, C., Forcadell, F. J., & Galán, J. I. (2014). Assessing the effect of public subsidies on firm R&D investment: A survey. Journal of Economic Surveys, 28(1), 36-67.
-
Determinants of intention to continue using internet banking: Indian context
Hamood Mohd. Al-Hattami ,
Abdulwahid Ahmed Hashed Abdullah ,
Afrah Abdullah Ali Khamis
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/im.17(1).2021.04
Innovative Marketing Volume 17, 2021 Issue #1 pp. 40-52 Views: 3265 Downloads: 1456 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯIt is necessary to understand the customers’ perceptions of internet banking because it helps determining the direction and patterns of intention to continue using internet banking. This could also help bank policymakers to develop appropriate strategies to increase internet banking usage. The study aims to examine the determinants of user’s intention to continue using internet banking since there have been no systematic attempts to understand this aspect, especially in the Indian context. This research suggests and tests an extended model to predict the intention to continue using internet banking in India. The suggested study model was examined using survey data from 206 internet banking users. PLS-SEM was employed for data analysis. The findings imply that the most significant determinants of intention to continue using internet banking are service quality, trust, and user satisfaction. On the other hand, the study finds that intention to continue using internet banking is not impacted by system quality and information quality.
-
Examining the adoption of Apple Pay among generation Z in Vietnam
Nguyen Minh Sang
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/bbs.19(1).2024.04
Banks and Bank Systems Volume 19, 2024 Issue #1 pp. 34-47 Views: 3142 Downloads: 1159 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯThis study examines the level of knowledge, use, and determinants determining the adoption of Apple Pay among Generation Z customers in Vietnam. An online survey with 339 participants aged 18-26 was done using quantitative methods. The participants were recruited using social media platforms. The study model included elements from technological acceptance theories, such as effort expectation, perceived risk, perceived value, and convenience. The measurements were ensured to be reliable and genuine. The hypotheses were tested by analyzing the data using partial least squares structural equation modeling. The study’s results suggest that the data collected through PLS-SEM analysis provide evidence in support of the hypotheses proposing that factors such as Mobile User Skillfulness, Personal Innovation, Perceived Usefulness, Effort Expectation, Convenience, and Perceived Value have a positive influence on individuals’ Intentions to Use Apple Pay in Vietnam. Furthermore, the study revealed that the variables of Perceived Risk and Social Image did not have a statistically significant influence. The findings suggest that the pragmatic orientation of Generation Z towards the functionality and ease of use of Apple Pay has a significant impact on their adoption of this payment system in Vietnam. The study offers banks in Vietnam significant insights regarding the promotion of mobile wallet adoption among the younger demographic. Adoption may be increased by presenting Apple Pay as a practical and convenient application.
Acknowledgment
The author would like to thank everyone who filled out the survey. Without the help of everyone involved and the Ho Chi Minh University of Banking (Vietnam), this study would not have been possible. -
Assessing the impacts of peer-to-peer recommender system on online shopping: PLS-SEM approach
Cuong Nguyen ,
Ninh Nguyen
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/im.20(4).2024.01
Peer-to-peer recommender systems play a critical role in online shopping in Vietnam. This paper aims to identify the relationship between Recommendation Quality and Purchase Intention and the moderating effects of Attitude and Trust on this relationship. Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling was used as a research method. The sample consisted of 365 respondents who frequently use recommender system when shopping online. Data were collected using non-probability sampling method. The questionnaire is delivered to online customers who frequently rely on peer-to-peer recommender systems to make a purchase decision. The results show that Recommendation Transparency, Recommendation Accuracy, Recommendation Novelty, and Recommendation Diversity are positively related to Recommendation Quality. Consequently, Recommendation Quality has a positive impact on Attitude, Trust, and Purchase Intention. Besides, Attitude has a positive impact on online Purchase Intention. Trust also has a positive impact on online Purchase Intention. Practical implications are proposed to improve the impacts of peer-to-peer recommender systems on online shopping.
