R&D expenditure and nominal GDP growth in Uzbekistan: Exploratory evidence from first difference and distributed lag models

  • 14 Views
  • 2 Downloads

Creative Commons License DMCA.com Protection Status
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Type of the article: Research Article

Abstract
This study investigates the association between R&D expenditure and nominal GDP growth in Uzbekistan, where R&D intensity (0.12-0.17% of GDP) falls significantly below global benchmarks. Given the short annual series available (2010–2024, N = 15) and measurement constraints, the findings are presented as exploratory associations rather than established causal effects. The dependent variable is based on GDP at current prices, so the estimated dynamics reflect nominal rather than real output growth, and R&D is measured as a share of GDP, which shares a common component with the dependent variable and may mechanically contribute to a negative association. A robustness check using reconstructed absolute R&D expenditure shows that the negative association persists, mitigating though not eliminating this concern. We apply first-difference and distributed-lag models to address non-stationarity issues indicated by Augmented Dickey–Fuller tests. The results suggest a statistically significant negative association between R&D intensity and nominal GDP growth. The first difference model suggests that a 1% increase in R&D intensity is associated with a 0.19% decrease in nominal GDP growth (p < 0.05). The distributed lag model suggests contemporaneous (–0.25%, p < 0.01) and one-year lagged (–0.16%, p < 0.05) negative associations, with a cumulative two-year association of –0.42%. The best-fitting model explains 68% of the variation in nominal GDP growth. The study concludes that enhancing R&D efficiency, building absorptive capacity, and fostering private sector participation are essential prerequisites for achieving positive returns from R&D investment in transitional economies.

view full abstract hide full abstract
    • Table 1. Data sources
    • Table 2. Variable definitions
    • Table 3. Descriptive statistics
    • Table 4. Correlation matrix
    • Table 5. Unit root test results (ADF, PP, and KPSS)
    • Table 6. First difference model estimation results
    • Table 7. Distributed lag model estimation results
    • Table 8. Diagnostic test results
    • Table 9. Model comparison summary
    • Table 10. Robustness check: Lag Model 3 with reconstructed absolute R&D expenditure
    • Conceptualization
      Sadokat Siddikova, Gulchehra Juraeva
    • Funding acquisition
      Sadokat Siddikova, Berdibay Saparov
    • Investigation
      Sadokat Siddikova, Gulchehra Juraeva, Berdibay Saparov
    • Resources
      Sadokat Siddikova, Gulchehra Juraeva, Shuhrat Khudayberganov
    • Supervision
      Sadokat Siddikova
    • Visualization
      Sadokat Siddikova, Lobar Nutfullaeva, Berdibay Saparov
    • Writing – original draft
      Sadokat Siddikova, Lobar Nutfullaeva, Xolilla Xolmuratov
    • Formal Analysis
      Fozil Xolmurotov, Shuhrat Khudayberganov, Xolilla Xolmuratov
    • Methodology
      Fozil Xolmurotov, Xolilla Xolmuratov
    • Project administration
      Fozil Xolmurotov
    • Software
      Fozil Xolmurotov, Xolilla Xolmuratov
    • Writing – review & editing
      Fozil Xolmurotov, Gulchehra Juraeva, Berdibay Saparov, Shuhrat Khudayberganov
    • Data curation
      Lobar Nutfullaeva
    • Validation
      Gulchehra Juraeva, Shuhrat Khudayberganov