How urban ecosystems and energy investment changed across global regions: An international business perspective

  • 13 Views
  • 3 Downloads

Creative Commons License DMCA.com Protection Status
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Type of the article: Research Article

Abstract
Urbanization and energy investment are increasingly interconnected, yet previous studies provide conflicting evidence regarding their relationship across different regional contexts. The relationship is particularly relevant to international business because regional differences in urban development and energy investment may shape the conditions for infrastructure-related investment. This study examines the relationship between changes in urban ecosystem indicators and energy investment growth across eight global regions from an international business perspective. The analysis is based on urban indicators derived from the Global Human Settlement Layer and energy investment data from the International Energy Agency. Urban indicators are aggregated for the ten largest cities in each region, comprising 80 cities, while energy investment is measured at the regional level. Percentage changes between 2015 and 2025 are compared using a 2×2 classification based on cross-regional median values across 20 urban–energy matrix combinations. The results reveal substantial heterogeneity. China most frequently exhibits Above-Median Urban Change–Above-Median Investment Growth configurations in 16 combinations, while India most frequently exhibits Below-Median Urban Change–Above-Median Investment Growth configurations in 12 combinations. Africa and the United States most frequently exhibit Below-Median Urban Change–Below-Median Investment Growth, whereas Latin America most frequently exhibits Above-Median Urban Change–Below-Median Investment Growth. The European Union, Southeast Asia, and the Middle East show borderline patterns because of tied configurations. These findings indicate that changes in urban ecosystems and energy investment do not follow a uniform regional pattern. The results support a context-dependency in which institutional and regional contexts are relevant to understanding urban–investment relationships.

view full abstract hide full abstract
    • Figure 1. BUV/Capita vs energy investment in renewables matrix
    • Figure 2. NRE share vs energy investment in energy matrix
    • Figure 3. MCI vs energy investment matrix in grid and storage
    • Figure 4. Regional typology of urban ecosystems and energy investment
    • Table 1. Percentage change in energy investment by region and energy segment (2015–2025)
    • Table 2. Characteristics of members of the urban-energy relation quadrant
    • Table A1. Representative cities for each region
    • Table B1. Urban ecosystem indicators by region (2015 and 2025)
    • Table C1. Complete matrix
    • Conceptualization
      M. Elfan Kaukab, Muhamad Agung Dharmajaya
    • Data curation
      M. Elfan Kaukab
    • Formal Analysis
      M. Elfan Kaukab
    • Funding acquisition
      M. Elfan Kaukab, Muhamad Agung Dharmajaya
    • Investigation
      M. Elfan Kaukab
    • Methodology
      M. Elfan Kaukab, Muhamad Agung Dharmajaya
    • Project administration
      M. Elfan Kaukab
    • Resources
      M. Elfan Kaukab
    • Software
      M. Elfan Kaukab
    • Supervision
      M. Elfan Kaukab, Muhamad Agung Dharmajaya
    • Visualization
      M. Elfan Kaukab, Muhamad Agung Dharmajaya
    • Writing – original draft
      M. Elfan Kaukab
    • Writing – review & editing
      M. Elfan Kaukab, Muhamad Agung Dharmajaya