Indicators differentiating the sustainability profiles of leading universities in the QS Sustainability Rankings

  • 5 Views
  • 2 Downloads

Creative Commons License DMCA.com Protection Status
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Type of the article: Research Article

In the context of the knowledge economy and globalization, one key factor in regional economic development is universities’ intellectual capital. In this regard, the purpose of this article is to analyze the relationship between universities’ intellectual capital and socio-economic differences across Kazakhstan’s regions. The research used an integrated index of universities’ intellectual capital developed in the authors’ previous study, factor and cluster analysis, and regression modeling. The research database includes data from the National Bureau of Statistics for 20 regions of Kazakhstan for 2015, 2020–2023. The findings suggest that an increase in the universities’ intellectual capital index is associated with an increase in gross regional product per capita (β = 87.32). The results demonstrate that the population’s nominal incomes were statistically insignificant, indicating no clear short-term association with income redistribution. Instead, the Gini coefficient increases significantly, suggesting higher levels of observed inequality and a possible concentration of benefits among higher-income groups in regions with high levels of university intellectual capital. More specifically, a 1-unit increase in universities’ intellectual capital is associated with a 0.371-point increase in the Gini coefficient. Moreover, the results of the cluster analysis show a high level of socio-economic imbalance between regions with high and low levels of university intellectual capital. The quantile regression suggests that universities’ intellectual capital is positively associated with economic growth but is also related to higher levels of social inequality. The results suggest the need for a differentiated regional policy to support the development of regional universities and ensure inclusive development.

view full abstract hide full abstract
    • Table 1. Assessment results of the contribution of QS Sustainability Rankings indicators to the principal components
    • Table 2. Medians of QS Sustainability Rankings indicators within the obtained university clusters by ranking category
    • Table А1. Components of QS World University Rankings: Sustainability 2026
    • Conceptualization
      Vladimir Bilozubenko, Fedir Zhuravka, Andriy Zhydyk
    • Funding acquisition
      Vladimir Bilozubenko, Andriy Zhydyk
    • Investigation
      Vladimir Bilozubenko, Olha Hryhorash, Оleksandr Mosin, Maxim Korneyev
    • Methodology
      Vladimir Bilozubenko, Fedir Zhuravka, Olha Hryhorash, Yuri Tovt
    • Validation
      Vladimir Bilozubenko, Olha Hryhorash
    • Visualization
      Vladimir Bilozubenko, Yuri Tovt, Оleksandr Mosin, Maxim Korneyev
    • Writing – original draft
      Vladimir Bilozubenko, Olha Hryhorash, Yuri Tovt, Оleksandr Mosin
    • Formal Analysis
      Fedir Zhuravka, Olha Hryhorash, Yuri Tovt, Оleksandr Mosin, Maxim Korneyev
    • Project administration
      Fedir Zhuravka, Andriy Zhydyk
    • Supervision
      Fedir Zhuravka, Olha Hryhorash, Andriy Zhydyk, Maxim Korneyev
    • Writing – review & editing
      Fedir Zhuravka, Andriy Zhydyk, Maxim Korneyev
    • Data curation
      Olha Hryhorash, Оleksandr Mosin, Maxim Korneyev
    • Software
      Olha Hryhorash, Yuri Tovt, Оleksandr Mosin
    • Resources
      Оleksandr Mosin, Maxim Korneyev