Generational differences in adapting to international publication standards: Evidence from Kazakhstan
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/kpm.10(2).2026.10
-
Article InfoVolume 10 2026, Issue #2, pp. 166-178
- 10 Views
-
2 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Type of the article: Research Article
This study is relevant given the growing reliance of post-Soviet higher education systems on bibliometric indicators to evaluate academic performance and allocate research funding. The purpose of the study is to examine whether generational cohorts of productive scientists in Kazakhstan differ in their publication patterns under the transition to bibliometric-based research evaluation. The study is based on a bibliometric analysis of 220 highly productive authors across 22 subject areas using Scopus and SciVal data for 2018–2023, with correlation analysis applied across three age cohorts (under 40, 41-55, and 56+). The results reveal significant generational differences in publication strategies. Among researchers under 40, a very strong correlation is observed between total publications and Q1 journal output (r = 0.95), and between publication activity and international collaboration (r = 0.98). This cohort also demonstrates higher publication activity in internationally co-authored papers and stronger alignment with formal bibliometric indicators. In contrast, the 41-55 cohort shows the weakest relationship between publication output and Q1 publications (r = 0.40), lower levels of leading authorship, and less pronounced integration into international publication networks. Researchers aged 56+ occupy an intermediate position but demonstrate the highest share of publications in journals later excluded from Scopus, indicating greater exposure to potentially problematic publication practices during earlier stages of Kazakhstan’s research system transformation. The findings suggest that highly productive scientists from different generational cohorts respond differently to formal bibliometric evaluation requirements. The presence of publications in journals later excluded from Scopus across all cohorts suggests that bibliometric-based evaluation systems may encourage strategic responses to performance criteria.
Acknowledgment
This research was funded by the Science Committee of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Kazakhstan (Grant No. BR21882373).
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)I23, I28
-
References53
-
Tables0
-
Figures2
-
- Figure 1. Number and share of publications in journals excluded from Scopus by age group
- Figure 2. Number of publications by authors in the natural sciences, aged under 40, in journals excluded from Scopus, relative to the total number of publications by these authors
-
- Abalkina, A. (2023). Publication and collaboration anomalies in academic papers originating from a paper mill: Evidence from a Russia-based paper mill. Learned Publishing, 36(4), 689-702.
- Abalkina, A., & Bishop, D. V. M. (2023). Paper mills: A novel form of publishing malpractice affecting psychology. Meta-Psychology, 7, 1-10.
- Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Murgia, G. (2015). The combined effects of age and seniority on research performance of full professors. Science and Public Policy, 43(3), 301-319.
- Adambekov, S., Askarova, S., Welburn, S. C., Goughnour, S. L., Konishi, A., LaPorte, R., & Linkov, F. (2016). Publication productivity in Central Asia and countries of the former Soviet Union. Central Asian Journal of Global Health, 5(1), Article 261.
- Alimova, N., & Brumshteyn, Y. (2020). Russia and post-Soviet countries compared: Coverage of papers by Scopus and Web of Science, languages, and productivity of researchers. European Science Editing, 46, e53192.
- Allahverdyan, A. G. (2018). Dinamika razvitiya rossiyskoy nauki: kadrovyy i geograficheskiy analiz [Dynamics of the development of Russian science: Personnel and gender analysis]. Science Studies. (In Russian).
- Bayanbayeva, A. (2025). Global university rankings and the dissemination of the Western university model: Balancing global influence and national priorities in Kazakhstan. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 1-15.
- Bentley, P. (2012). Gender differences and factors affecting publication productivity among Australian university academics. Journal of Sociology, 48(1), 85-103.
- Berekeyeva, A., Sharplin, E., Courtney, M., & Sagitova, R. (2024). Ethical human participant research in Central Asia: A quantitative analysis of attitudes and practices among social science researchers based in the region. Research Ethics, 20(2), 304-330.
- Bonaccorsi, A., & Daraio, C. (2003). Age effects in scientific productivity. Scientometrics, 58, 49-90.
- Chankseliani, M., Lovakov, A., & Pislyakov, V. (2021). A big picture: Bibliometric study of academic publications from post-Soviet countries. Scientometrics, 126, 8701-8730.
- Collyer, F. M. (2016). Global patterns in the publishing of academic knowledge: Global North, global South. Current Sociology, 66(1), 56-73.
- Costas, R., Van Leeuwen, T. N., & Bordons, M. (2010). A bibliometric classificatory approach for the study and assessment of research performance at the individual level: The effects of age on productivity and impact. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 61(8), 1564-1581.
- Demir, S. B. (2018). Predatory journals: Who publishes them and why? Journal of Informetrics, 12(4), 1296-1311.
- Dubois, P., Rochet, J. C., & Schlenker, J. M. (2014). Productivity and mobility in academic research: Evidence from mathematicians. Scientometrics, 98(3), 1669-1701.
- Eshchanov, B., Abduraimov, K., Ibragimova, M., & Eshchanov, R. (2021). Efficiency of “publish or perish” policy – Some considerations based on the Uzbekistan experience. Publications, 9(3), Article 33.
- Gingras, Y., Larivière, V., Macaluso, B., & Robitaille, J.-P. (2008). The effects of aging on researchers’ publication and citation patterns. PLOS ONE, 3(12), e4048.
- Gomez, C. J., Herman, A. C., & Parigi, P. (2022). Leading countries in global science increasingly receive more citations than other countries doing similar research. Nature Human Behaviour, 6, 919-929.
- Guns, R., Eykens, J., & Engels, T. C. E. (2019). To what extent do successive cohorts adopt different publication patterns? Peer review, language use, and publication types in the social sciences and humanities. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 3, Article 38.
- Heng, K., Hamid, M. O., & Khan, A. (2020). Factors influencing academics’ research engagement and productivity: A developing countries perspective. Issues in Educational Research, 30(3), 965-987.
- Jung, J., Kooij, R., & Teichler, U. (2014). Internationalization and the New Generation of Academics. In F. Huang, M. Finkelstein, & M. Rostan (Eds.), The Internationalization of the Academy. The Changing Academy - The Changing Academic Profession in International Comparative Perspective (vol 10, pp. 207-236). Dordrecht: Springer.
- Kaztayeva, S. (2023). Osobennosti izdatelskoy praktiki v khishchnicheskikh zhurnalakh [Features of publishing practice in predatory journals]. Journal of Educational Sciences, 76(3), 29-39. (In Russian).
- Kenessov, B. (2020). Percentage of articles and reviews by countries in sources discontinued by Scopus [Data set]. Mendeley Data.
- Köbli, N. A., Leisenheimer, L., Achter, M., Kucera, T., & Schadler, C. (2024). The game of academic publishing: A review of gamified publication practices in the social sciences. Frontiers in Communication, 9, Article 1323867.
- Kocyigit, B. F., Akyol, A., Gulov, M. K., & Yessirkepov, M. (2023). Comparative analysis of Central Asian publication activity using SCImago Journal & Country Rank data in 1996–2021. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 38(14), e104.
- Kudaibergenova, R., Uzakbay, S., Makanova, A., Ramadinkyzy, K., Kistaubayev, E., Dussekeev, R., & Smagulov, K. (2022). Managing publication change at Al-Farabi Kazakh National University: A case study. Scientometrics, 127, 453-479.
- Kurambayev, B., & Freedman, E. (2020). Publish or perish? The steep path for Central Asia journalism and mass communication faculty. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 76(2), 228-240.
- Kurt, S. (2018). Why do authors publish in predatory journals? Learned Publishing, 31(2), 141-147.
- Kuzhabekova, A., & Ruby, A. (2018). Raising research productivity in a post-Soviet higher education system: A case from Central Asia. European Education, 50(3), 266-282.
- Kwiek, M. (2020). Internationalists and locals: International research collaboration in a resource-poor system. Scientometrics, 124, 57-105.
- Kyvik, S., & Olsen, T. B. (2008). Does the aging of tenured academic staff affect the research performance of universities? Scientometrics, 76, 439-455.
- Marina, T., & Sterligov, I. (2021). Prevalence of potentially predatory publishing in Scopus on the country level. Scientometrics, 126, 5019-5077.
- Milojević, S. (2012). How are academic age, productivity, and collaboration related to citing behavior of researchers? PLOS ONE, 7(11), e49176.
- Minister of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan (MES). (2015). Order of the Acting Minister of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan dated March 16, 2015, No. 124 “On approval of the rules for conferring the title ‘Best University Lecturer”.
- Minister of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan (MES). (2011a). Order of the Minister of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan dated March 31, 2011, No. 127 “On approval of the Rules for awarding degrees”.
- Minister of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan (MES). (2011b). Order of the Minister of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan dated March 31, 2011, No. 128 “On approval of the Rules for conferring academic titles (associated professor (docent), professor)”.
- Minister of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan (MES). Order of the Minister of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan dated November 2, 2021, No. 544 “On the approval of the Rules for awarding the annual prize ‘Best Researcher”.
- Minister of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Kazakhstan (MSHE). (2024). Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan “On Science and Technological Policy”, No. 103-VIII ZRK, July 1, 2024.
- Minister of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Kazakhstan (MSHE). 457 (2024). Order of the Minister of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Kazakhstan dated September 23, 2024, No. 457 “On approval of the Rules and criteria for the election of academicians of the National Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Kazakhstan”.
- Minister of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Kazakhstan (MSHE). (2023). Order of the Acting Minister of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Kazakhstan dated September 14, 2023, No. 466 “On the approval of the Rules for awarding prizes and state scientific scholarships in the field of science”.
- Mishra, V., & Smyth, R. (2012). Are more senior academics really more research productive than junior academics? Evidence from Australian law schools. Scientometrics, 96(2), 411-425.
- Moldashev, K., Arystanbaeva, S., Kozhahmet, S., & Tleuov, A. (2020). Problemy prodvizheniya kazakhstanskikh uchenykh v globalnom nauchnom prostranstve [Problems of integration of Kazakhstani scientists into the global scientific space]. Narxoz University. (In Russian).
- Moldashev, K., Tleuov, A., & Radko, N. (2018). The economics of publication regime and the issues of Kazakhstani researchers integration into the global scientific community. Central Asian Economic Review, 4, 127-138. (In Russian).
- Nafukho, F. M., Wekullo, C., & Muyia, M. H. (2019). Examining research productivity of faculty in selected leading public universities in Kenya. International Journal of Educational Development, 66, 44-51.
- Naumova, T. V. (2012). Feminizatsiya Nauki V Sovremennoy Rossii: Za I Protiv [Feminization of science in modern Russia: Pros and cons]. Social and Humanitarian Knowledge, 1, 43-57. (In Russian).
- Obuku, E. A., Lavis, J. N., Kinengyere, A., Ssenono, R., Ocan, M., Mafigiri, D. K., Ssengooba, F., Karamagi, C., & Sewankambo, N. K. (2018). A systematic review on academic research productivity of postgraduate students in low- and middle-income countries. Health Research Policy and Systems, 16, Article 86.
- Rostan, M., & Ceravolo, F. A. (2015). The internationalization of the academy: Convergence and divergence across disciplines. European Review, 23(S1), 38-54.
- Schöpf, C. M. (2020). The coloniality of global knowledge production. Social Transformations: Journal of the Global South, 8(2).
- Shah, W. A., Ali, R., & Lashari, A. (2024). De-naturalizing the “predatory”: A study of bogus publications. Accountability in Research, 31(2), 80-99.
- Smagulov, K., & Teixeira da Silva, J. A. (2025). Scientific productivity and retracted literature of authors with Kazakhstani affiliations. Journal of Academic Ethics.
- Tang, G., & Jia, J. (2021). Why do master’s students publish in predatory journals? Accountability in Research, 30(1), 1-20.
- Wahid, N., Warraich, N. F., & Tahira, M. (2024). Assessing the research profile of highly productive authors of Pakistan. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, 73, 183-201.
- Xia, J., Harmon, J. L., Connolly, K. G., Donnelly, R. M., Anderson, M. R., & Howard, H. A. (2015). Who publishes in predatory journals? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(7), 1406-1417.


