Why environmental costs go unclassified: Accounting practices and institutional gaps in South Papua, Indonesia
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/afc.07(2).2026.09
-
Article InfoVolume 7 2026, Issue #2, pp. 140-155
- 18 Views
-
2 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Type of the article: Research Article
Large-scale enterprises in developing economies routinely incur environmental expenditures, yet these costs frequently remain unclassified within formal accounting systems, limiting their utility for regulatory evaluation and public accountability. This study examines how environmental cost-recording practices in large-scale enterprises relate to the Environmental Agency’s financial control function in South Papua’s hazardous waste governance system. A qualitative design was employed, drawing on interviews with eleven informants from two environmental agencies and three large-scale enterprises in the Merauke region, supplemented by secondary hazardous waste data spanning 2017 to 2022. The study finds that both enterprises incur identifiable expenditures across all four environmental management accounting cost categories, covering prevention, detection, internal failure, and external failure, yet none are formally classified as environmental costs in their financial statements. Total hazardous and toxic waste stored reached 88,172.81 cubic meters over the study period, yet the financial footprint of this activity remains invisible within existing accountability structures. The Environmental Agency’s supervisory framework is confined to technical document compliance, with no mechanism for engaging enterprise financial cost data. The absence of a regulatory demand signal for environmental cost classification emerges as a recurring and consistent explanation across all informants, operating alongside enterprise-level capacity constraints and the absence of standardized cost classification frameworks. These findings suggest that supervisory framework design warrants greater attention in efforts to close the environmental cost classification gap, and point toward areas warranting further institutional exploration, including the potential role of pollution cost benchmarks and sustainability-linked supervisory performance indicators as directions for future policy development.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)M41, Q53, H83
-
References52
-
Tables4
-
Figures3
-
- Figure 1. NVivo coding diagram: Environmental Agency oversight mechanisms
- Figure 2. NVivo coding diagram: Hazardous and toxic waste oversight dimensions
- Figure 3. NVivo coding diagram: Environmental cost recording practices and SDG contributions
-
- Table 1. Profile of informants
- Table 2. Informant distribution
- Table 3. Hazardous and toxic waste volume in merauke regency, 2017 to 2022
- Table 4. Environmental expenditures by EMA cost category, PT PELINDO and PT Bio Inti Agrindo
-
- Abdullah, M., Hamzah, N., Ali, M. H., Tseng, M.-L., & Brander, M. (2020). The Southeast Asian haze: The quality of environmental disclosures and firm performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 246, 118958
- Adisty, T. J., & Sumarna, A. D. (2025). Investigating the effect of green accounting adoption and sustainability disclosure in Indonesian manufacturing companies. Journal of Applied Accounting and Taxation, 10(1), 106-113.
- Adler, R., Mansi, M., & Pandey, R. (2022). Accounting for waste management: A study of the reporting practices of the top listed Indian companies. Accounting & Finance, 62(2), 2401-2437.
- Alaika, A. A., & Firmansyah, A. (2024). Unveiling the impact of green accounting and sustainability disclosure on the firm value. Journal of Governance, Risk Management, Compliance and Sustainability, 4(2), 64-78.
- Alsaid, L. A. Z. A., & Mutiganda, J. C. (2024). Sustainability management accounting in urban development: A case study of an Egyptian state-owned enterprise. Sustainability, 16(18), 8235.
- Blackman, A., Li, Z., & Liu, A. A. (2018). Efficacy of command-and-control and market-based environmental regulation in developing countries. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 10(1), 381-404.
- Boatca, M. E., Vartolomei, M., & Sirbu, R. M. (2023). Environmental management accounting: Analysis of environmental costs and decision-making in the organisation. Scientific Bulletin of the Politehnica University of Timişoara: Transactions on Engineering and Management, 7(1-2), 21-25.
- D’Amore, G., D’Alessio, A., & Scaletti, A. (2025). Environmental accounting and sustainability accounting: Lexical or substantial difference? Sustainable Development, 33(S1), 1376-1394
- Di Vaio, A., Hasan, S., Palladino, R., & Hassan, R. (2023). The transition towards circular economy and waste within accounting and accountability models: A systematic literature review and conceptual framework. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 25(1), 734-810.
- DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160
- Fadillah, H., Widyowati, M. P., Herdiyana, H., Irwansyah, I., & Darma, D. C. (2022). Have companies in Indonesia disclose environmental accounting? Acta Tecnologia, 8(2), 46-57.
- Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman.
- Grueso-Gala, M., & Camisón-Haba, S. (2025). The role of reputation and regulation in shaping non-financial information reporting. Administrative Sciences, 15(5), 174.
- Hansen, D. R., & Mowen, M. M. (2009). Managerial accounting (8th ed.). Salemba Empat.
- Hartono, H., Da Silva, J., Da Costa, F., Melianto, D., & Suparta, M. (2025). Implementasi metode analisis menggunakan NVivo dalam penelitian kualitatif. AKUNTANSI 45, 6(1), 522-530.
- Hazaea, S. A., Zhu, J., Khatib, S. F. A., Bazhair, A. H., & Elamer, A. A. (2022). Sustainability assurance practices: A systematic review and future research agenda. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(4), 4843-4864.
- He, P., Shen, H., Zhang, Y., & Ren, J. (2019). External pressure, corporate governance, and voluntary carbon disclosure: Evidence from China. Sustainability, 11(10), 2901.
- Huang, R., Xie, X., & Zhou, H. (2022). “Isomorphic” behavior of corporate greenwashing. Chinese Journal of Population, Resources and Environment, 20(1), 29-39.
- Huynh, Q. L., & Nguyen, V. K. (2024). The role of environmental management accounting in sustainability. Sustainability, 16(17), 7440.
- Imbiri, S., Rameezdeen, R., Chileshe, N., & Statsenko, L. (2023). Stakeholder perspectives on supply chain risks: The case of Indonesian palm oil industry in West Papua. Sustainability, 15(12), 9605.
- Khan, K., Khan, W. A., Yan, Y., Khokhar, M., Rehman, M. Z., & Ullah, A. (2026). Bridging the sustainability gap: The impact of business-government relations on corporate carbon monitoring in developing countries. Carbon Balance and Management, 21(1), 50.
- Kopyrina, O., Wu, K., & Ying, Z. (2023). Greening through central inspection: The role of legitimacy pressure and risk-taking. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 77, 101894.
- Laffont, J.-J., & Tirole, J. (1993). A theory of incentives in procurement and regulation. MIT Press.
- Li, B., & Wang, A. Y. (2024). On the EPA’s radar: The role of financial reports in environmental regulatory oversight (Working paper). SSRN.
- Li, D., Huang, M., Ren, S., Chen, X., & Ning, L. (2018). Environmental legitimacy, green innovation, and corporate carbon disclosure: Evidence from CDP China 100. Journal of Business Ethics, 150(4), 1089-1104.
- Luo, X., Zhang, R., & Liu, W. (2022). Environmental legitimacy pressure, political connection and impression management of carbon information disclosure. Carbon Management, 13(1), 90-104.
- Malia, E. (2019). Peranan Dinas Lingkungan Hidup dalam pengawasan penerapan akuntansi lingkungan pada entitas bisnis di Kabupaten Pamekasan. Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Jember, 17(2).
- Malterud, K., Siersma, V. D., & Guassora, A. D. (2016). Sample size in qualitative interview studies: Guided by information power. Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1753-1760.
- Molinari, M., & de Villiers, C. (2021). Qualitative accounting research in the time of COVID-19 – changes, challenges and opportunities. Pacific Accounting Review, 33(5), 568-577.
- Mukwarami, S., & van der Poll, H. M. (2024). A theoretical approach to address environmental management accounting implementation barriers in small and medium enterprises in developing countries. Discover Sustainability, 5(1), 385.
- Mukwarami, S., Nkwaira, C., & van der Poll, H. M. (2023). Environmental management accounting implementation challenges and supply chain management in emerging economies’ manufacturing sector. Sustainability, 15(2), 1061.
- Nguyen, T. M. A. (2024). Adoption of environmental management accounting in Vietnamese enterprises: An empirical analysis of influencing determinants. PLOS ONE, 19(7), e0304902.
- Nofriadi, H., Yulida, R., & Astuty, P. (2025). A decade of green accounting in Indonesia and the UK: Implementation, challenges, and opportunities. International Journal of Economics and Management Research, 4(3), 341-353.
- Nyakuwanika, M., van der Poll, H. M., & van der Poll, J. A. (2021). A conceptual framework for greener goldmining through environmental management accounting practices (EMAPs): The case of Zimbabwe. Sustainability, 13(18), 10466.
- Qian, W., Parker, L., & Zhu, J. (2024). Corporate environmental reporting in the China context: The interplay of stakeholder salience, socialist ideology and state power. The British Accounting Review, 56(1), 101198.
- Qian, W., Tilt, C., & Belal, A. (2021). Social and environmental accounting in developing countries: Contextual challenges and insights. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 34(5), 1021-1050.
- Rahman, M. M., Saha, S., & Hoque, M. (2024). Unveiling the link between environmental management accounting, energy efficiency, and accountability in state-owned enterprises: An integrated analysis using PLS-SEM and fsQCA. Environmental Challenges, 14, 100832.
- Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2012). Research methods for business students (6th ed.). Pearson Education.
- Silva, D. (2022). Pre-service teachers’ understanding of culture in multicultural education: A qualitative content analysis. Teaching and Teacher Education, 110, 103580.
- Soleha, N., & Rosiana, R. (2021). Exploring sustainability reports in the Indonesian palm oil industry. Journal of Applied Business, Taxation and Economics Research, 1(1), 77-94.
- Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571-610.
- Taygashinova, K., & Akhmetova, A. (2019). Accounting for environmental costs as an instrument of environmental controlling in the company. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 30(1), 87-97.
- To, M. H., & Tran, B. M. (2025). Environmental regulatory stringency and corporate reporting quality: Evidence from waste, emissions, water, and energy regulations in Vietnamese firms. Environmental Economics, 16(3), 67-81.
- United Nations Division for Sustainable Development. (2001). Environmental management accounting procedures and principles. United Nations.
- van der Poll, H. M. (2022). The barriers and drivers of environmental management accounting practices’ adoption in developed and developing countries for sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 30(5), 1222-1234.
- Wahyuningrum, I. F. S., Djajadikerta, H. G., Trireksani, T., Budihardjo, M. A., & Sriningsih, S. (2026). Environmental disclosure in Indonesia: A study of manufacturing and mining companies. Asian Journal of Accounting Research, 11(2), 218-232.
- Wang, A., Bi, C., & Zhang, Y. (2025). Government accounting supervision and supply chain environmental investment. Finance Research Letters, 76, 106977.
- Wang, T., & Chen, Y. (2022). Environmental legislation and capitalization of corporate environmental expenditure: Evidence from China. PLOS ONE, 17(11), e0277258.
- Wichianrak, J., Khan, T., Teh, D., & Dellaportas, S. (2023). Critical perspectives of NGOs on voluntary corporate environmental reporting: Thai public listed companies. Sustainability, 15(7), 6195.
- Zakota, M. (2025). EPA scrutiny and voluntary environmental disclosures. Review of Accounting Studies, 30(4), 3514-3557.
- Zatini, G., Della Porta, A., & Za, S. (2025). Deciphering barriers and strategies in environmental management accounting (EMA) adoption: A comprehensive two-decade analysis. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 32(3), 3355-3370.
- Zhao, R., Mou, Y., & Yu, X. (2025). Analysis of the moderating effects of environmental regulations on green accounting information disclosure and financial performance of heavily polluting enterprises. Finance Research Letters, 72, 106493.


