Demystifying crypto-asset adoption intention: What matters more, technology or human motivation?

  • 9 Views
  • 0 Downloads

Creative Commons License DMCA.com Protection Status
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Type of the article: Research Article

Abstract
Crypto-assets attract interest as alternatives to centralized financial systems, yet adoption remains limited in advanced economies. This study explores how technological characteristics and human motivations affect adoption intentions, using Czechia as the context of a developed economy. The study applies a dual-stage framework- partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) to test hypotheses on data from 387 Czech adults via face-to-face questionnaires (March-October 2023), and artificial neural network (ANN) analysis to rank factor importance. PLS-SEM findings show Effort Expectancy as the strongest predictor of adoption intention, while Compatibility drives Performance Expectancy, which indirectly drives adoption intention. Relative Advantage significantly shapes Effort Expectancy and indirectly affects adoption intention. However, ANN sensitivity analysis shows technological characteristics dominate overall, with Compatibility showing the highest normalized importance (91.5%), followed by Relative Advantage (79.9%) and Effort Expectancy (50.9%). These results show technological characteristics and human motivations both contribute to adoption intentions, with prominence depending on analytical perspective- ease of use was the strongest direct predictor in PLS-SEM, while Compatibility dominated overall predictive importance in ANN. This indicates that in a stable, resilient financial environment, digital proficiency does not translate into tolerance for complexity; rather, adoption intentions depend on the technology’s ability to align effortlessly with established daily habits. Consequently, the study suggests fostering adoption in developed economies requires reducing structural complexity rather than merely increasing digital literacy.

view full abstract hide full abstract
    • Figure 1. Conceptual model
    • Figure 2. Author-generated model using Smart PLS 4
    • Table 1. Sample profile
    • Table 2. Reliability and validity of constructs
    • Table 3. Discriminant validity
    • Table 4. Hypothesized relationships
    • Table 5. RMSE values during testing and training stages (N = 387)
    • Table 6. Sensitivity analysis with normalized importance
    • Conceptualization
      Khurram Ajaz Khan, Jana Prilucikova
    • Formal Analysis
      Khurram Ajaz Khan, Mohammed Anam Akhtar, Anita Tangl
    • Investigation
      Khurram Ajaz Khan, Mohammed Anam Akhtar, Rohit Kumar Vishwakarma
    • Methodology
      Khurram Ajaz Khan, Mohammed Anam Akhtar
    • Resources
      Khurram Ajaz Khan, Jana Prilucikova, Rohit Kumar Vishwakarma, Anita Tangl
    • Supervision
      Khurram Ajaz Khan, Anita Tangl
    • Visualization
      Khurram Ajaz Khan, Mohammed Anam Akhtar, Jana Prilucikova, Rohit Kumar Vishwakarma
    • Writing – original draft
      Khurram Ajaz Khan, Mohammed Anam Akhtar, Jana Prilucikova, Rohit Kumar Vishwakarma, Anita Tangl
    • Writing – review & editing
      Khurram Ajaz Khan, Mohammed Anam Akhtar, Jana Prilucikova, Anita Tangl
    • Data curation
      Mohammed Anam Akhtar, Jana Prilucikova, Rohit Kumar Vishwakarma
    • Software
      Mohammed Anam Akhtar
    • Validation
      Mohammed Anam Akhtar, Rohit Kumar Vishwakarma
    • Funding acquisition
      Anita Tangl
    • Project administration
      Anita Tangl