Demystifying crypto-asset adoption intention: What matters more, technology or human motivation?
-
Received March 2, 2026;Accepted August 5, 2026;Published September 17, 2026
-
Author(s)Khurram Ajaz KhanLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5728-8955
,
Mohammed Anam AkhtarLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8441-5056
,
Jana PrilucikovaLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0204-187X
,
Rohit Kumar VishwakarmaLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0009-0004-3173-9331
,
Anita TanglLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0418-5439
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.23(3).2026.35
-
Article InfoVolume 23 2026, Issue #3, pp. 518–532
- TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ
- 9 Views
-
0 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Type of the article: Research Article
Abstract
Crypto-assets attract interest as alternatives to centralized financial systems, yet adoption remains limited in advanced economies. This study explores how technological characteristics and human motivations affect adoption intentions, using Czechia as the context of a developed economy. The study applies a dual-stage framework- partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) to test hypotheses on data from 387 Czech adults via face-to-face questionnaires (March-October 2023), and artificial neural network (ANN) analysis to rank factor importance. PLS-SEM findings show Effort Expectancy as the strongest predictor of adoption intention, while Compatibility drives Performance Expectancy, which indirectly drives adoption intention. Relative Advantage significantly shapes Effort Expectancy and indirectly affects adoption intention. However, ANN sensitivity analysis shows technological characteristics dominate overall, with Compatibility showing the highest normalized importance (91.5%), followed by Relative Advantage (79.9%) and Effort Expectancy (50.9%). These results show technological characteristics and human motivations both contribute to adoption intentions, with prominence depending on analytical perspective- ease of use was the strongest direct predictor in PLS-SEM, while Compatibility dominated overall predictive importance in ANN. This indicates that in a stable, resilient financial environment, digital proficiency does not translate into tolerance for complexity; rather, adoption intentions depend on the technology’s ability to align effortlessly with established daily habits. Consequently, the study suggests fostering adoption in developed economies requires reducing structural complexity rather than merely increasing digital literacy.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)E42, O33, G41
-
References77
-
Tables6
-
Figures2
-
- Figure 1. Conceptual model
- Figure 2. Author-generated model using Smart PLS 4
-
- Table 1. Sample profile
- Table 2. Reliability and validity of constructs
- Table 3. Discriminant validity
- Table 4. Hypothesized relationships
- Table 5. RMSE values during testing and training stages (N = 387)
- Table 6. Sensitivity analysis with normalized importance
-
- Akhtar, M. A., Khan, K. A., Tandon, P., & Shore, A. (2025). Beyond hardships: examining prosocialness as a catalyst for positive financial behavior. International Studies of Management and Organization, 1–22.
- Akyildirim, E., Corbet, S., Sensoy, A., & Yarovaya, L. (2020). The impact of blockchain related name changes on corporate performance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 65, 101759.
- Albayati, H., Kim, S. K., & Rho, J. J. (2020). Accepting financial transactions using blockchain technology and cryptocurrency: A customer perspective approach. Technology in Society, 62, 101320.
- Alomari, A. S. A., & Abdullah, N. L. (2023). Factors influencing the behavioral intention to use Cryptocurrency among Saudi Arabian public university students: Moderating role of financial literacy. Cogent Business and Management, 10(1), 2178092.
- Arias-Oliva, M., Pelegrín-Borondo, J., & Matías-Clavero, G. (2019). Variables influencing cryptocurrency use: A technology acceptance model in Spain. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 475.
- Arts, J. W. C., Frambach, R. T., & Bijmolt, T. H. A. (2011). Generalizations on consumer innovation adoption: A meta-analysis on drivers of intention and behavior. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 28(2), 134-144.
- Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (2012). Specification, evaluation, and interpretation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(1), 8-34.
- Bahoo, S. (2020). Corruption in banks: A bibliometric review and agenda. Finance Research Letters, 35, 101499.
- Becker, J.-M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., & Völckner, F. (2015). How collinearity affects mixture regression results. Marketing Letters, 26(4), 643-659.
- Beres, D. L., & Hawkins, D. M. (2001). Plackett–Burman technique for sensitivity analysis of many-parametered models. Ecological Modelling, 141(1-3), 171-183.
- Bharadwaj, S., & Deka, S. (2021). Behavioural intention towards investment in cryptocurrency: An integration of ‘rogers’ diffusion of innovation theory and the technology acceptance model. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia, 9(4), 137-159.
- Bhimani, A., Hausken, K., & Arif, S. (2022). Do national development factors affect cryptocurrency adoption? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 181, 121739.
- Bommer, W. H., Milevoj, E., & Rana, S. (2023). The intention to use cryptocurrency: A meta-analysis of what we know. Emerging Markets Review, 55.
- Bommer, W. H., Rana, S., & Milevoj, E. (2022). A meta-analysis of eWallet adoption using the UTAUT model. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 40(4), 791-819.
- Borrás, S., & Edler, J. (2020). The roles of the state in the governance of socio-technical ‘systems’ transformation. Research Policy, 49(5), 103971.
- Çera, G., Pagria, I., Khan, K. A., & Muaremi, L. (2020). Mobile banking usage and gamification: the moderating effect of generational cohorts. Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 22(3), 243-263.
- Chainalysis. (2025). The 2025 geography of crypto report: What regional trends reveal about what’s next in crypto. Chainalysis Blockchain Data Platform.
- Chen, X., Miraz, M. H., Gazi, M. A. I., Rahaman, M. A., Habib, M. M., & Hossain, A. I. (2022). Factors affecting cryptocurrency adoption in digital business transactions: The mediating role of customer satisfaction. Technology in Society, 70, 102059.
- Czech Statistical Office (CZSO). (2025). Individuals using the internet: ICT usage in households and by individuals.
- Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 13(3), 319-339.
- Dinh, C.-M., & Park, S. (2024). How to increase consumer intention to use Chatbots? An empirical analysis of hedonic and utilitarian motivations on social presence and the moderating effects of fear across generations. Electronic Commerce Research, 24(4), 24272467.
- Easley, D., O’Hara, M., & Basu, S. (2019). From mining to markets: The evolution of bitcoin transaction fees. Journal of Financial Economics, 134(1), 91-109.
- European Commission (EC). (2025). European Innovation Scoreboard 2025: Country profile Czechia. Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, Publications Office of the European Union.
- European Commission. (EC). (2024). Digital Decade Country Report 2024: Czechia.
- Frederiks, A. J., Costa, S., Hulst, B., & Groen, A. J. (2022). The early bird catches the worm: The role of regulatory uncertainty in early adoption of ‘blockchain’s cryptocurrency by fintech ventures. Journal of Small Business Management, 62(2), 790-823.
- García-Monleón, F., Erdmann, A., & Arilla, R. (2023). A value-based approach to the adoption of cryptocurrencies. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 8(2), Article 100342.
- Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications.
- Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
- Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2-24.
- Hairudin, A., Sifat, I. M., Mohamad, A., & Yusof, Y. (2022). Cryptocurrencies: A survey on acceptance, governance and market dynamics. International Journal of Finance and Economics, 27(4), 4633-4659.
- Hamid, M. R., Sami, W., & Mohmad Sidek, M. H. (2017). Discriminant validity assessment: Use of Fornell & Larcker criterion versus HTMT criterion. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 890, Article 012163.
- Henseler, J., Dijkstra, T. K., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., Diamantopoulos, A., Straub, D. W., Ketchen, D. J., Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., & Calantone, R. J. (2014). Common beliefs and reality about PLS: Comments on Rönkkö and Evermann (2013). Organizational Research Methods, 17(2), 182-209.
- Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135.
- Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. In Advances in International Marketing (Vol. 20, pp. 277-319). Emerald.
- Hew, J. J., Leong, L. Y., Tan, G. W. H., Ooi, K. B., & Lee, V. H. (2019). The age of mobile social commerce: An Artificial Neural Network analysis on its resistances. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 144, 311-324.
- Hlawiczka, R., & Mikustak, D.. (2026). Digital transformation of banks during the COVID-19 pandemic from the perspective of employees and management in the Czech Republic. Journal of Business Sectors, 4(1), 91–101.
- Hooda, A., Gupta, P., Jeyaraj, A., Giannakis, M., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2022). The effects of trust on behavioral intention and use behavior within e-government contexts. International Journal of Information Management, 67, Article 102553.
- Hua, X., Huang, Y., & Zheng, Y. (2019). Current practices, new insights, and emerging trends of financial technologies. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 119(7), 1401-1410.
- Hughes, L., Dwivedi, Y. K., Misra, S. K., Rana, N. P., Raghavan, V., & Akella, V. (2019). Blockchain research, practice and policy: Applications, benefits, limitations, emerging research themes and research agenda. International Journal of Information Management, 49, 114-129.
- International Institute for Management Development (IMD). (2023). World Digital Competitiveness Ranking 2023.
- Jariyapan, P., Mattayaphutron, S., Gillani, S. N., & Shafique, O. (2022). Factors influencing the behavioural intention to use cryptocurrency in emerging economies during the COVID-19 pandemic: Based on Technology Acceptance Model 3, perceived risk, and financial literacy. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 814087.
- Kala, D., & Chaubey, D. S. (2023, March 14). Cryptocurrency adoption and continuance intention among Indians: moderating role of perceived government control. Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance, 25(3), 288-304.
- Kasza, G., Izsó, T., Kunszabó, A., Szakos, D., Lénárt, I., Bozánné Békefi, E., Vongxay, K., Popp, J., Oláh, J., Lakner, Z., Nugraha, W. S., Bognár, L., & Süth, M. (2024). Consumer knowledge, attitudes, and behaviour regarding food safety – A perspective from Laos. Heliyon, 10(9), Article e29725.
- Kumpajaya, A., & Dhewanto, W. (2015). the Acceptance of Bitcoin in Indonesia: Extending Tam With Idt. Journal of Business and Management, 4(1), 28-38.
- Lai, P. C. (2017). The literature review of technology adoption models and theories for the novelty technology. Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management, 14(1), 21-38.
- Li, X., & Wang, C. A. (2017). The Technology and economic determinants of cryptocurrency exchange rates: The case of Bitcoin. Decision Support Systems, 95, 49-60.
- Liang, T. P., Kohli, R., Huang, H. C., & Li, Z. L. (2021). What Drives the Adoption of the Blockchain Technology? A Fit-Viability Perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 38(2), 314-337.
- Liébana-Cabanillas, F., Marinkovic, V., Ramos de Luna, I., & Kalinic, Z. (2018). Predicting the determinants of mobile payment acceptance: A hybrid SEM-neural network approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 129, 117-130.
- Mendling, J., Weber, I., Aalst, W.V.D, Brocke, J.V., Cabanillas, C., Daniel, F., Debois, S., Di Ciccio, C., Dumas, M., Dustdar, S., Gal, A., García-Bañuelos, L., Governatori, G., Hull, R., La Rosa, Leopold, H., Leymann, F., Recker, J., Reichert, M., Reijers, H. A., Rinderle-Ma, S., … & Zhu, L. (2018). Blockchains for Business Process Management - Challenges and Opportunities. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems, 9(1), 1-16.
- Meyer, G. (2004). Diffusion methodology: Time to innovate? Journal of Health Communication, 9(1), 59-69.
- Mirzaei, A. (2019). Market power among UAE banks: The 2008 financial crisis and its impact. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 71, 56-66.
- Misra, R., Mahajan, R., Singh, N., Khorana, S., & Rana, N. P. (2022). Factors impacting behavioural intentions to adopt the electronic marketplace: findings from small businesses in India. Electronic Markets, 32(3), 1639-1660.
- Negnevitsky, M. (2011). Artificial intelligence: A guide to intelligent systems (3rd ed.). University of Tasmania.
- Nordhoff, S., Louw, T., Innamaa, S., Lehtonen, E., Beuster, A., Torrao, G., Bjorvatn, A., Kessel, T., Malin, F., Happee, R., & Merat, N. (2020). Using the UTAUT2 model to explain public acceptance of conditionally automated (L3) cars: A questionnaire study among 9,118 car drivers from eight European countries. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 74, 280-297.
- Nseke, P. (2018). How Crypto-Currency Can Decrypt the Global Digital Divide: Bitcoins a Means for African Emergence. International Journal of Innovation and Economic Development, 3(6), 61-70.
- Ooi, K. B., Lee, V. H., Tan, G. W. H., Hew, T. S., & Hew, J. J. (2018). Cloud computing in manufacturing: The next industrial revolution in Malaysia? Expert Systems with Applications, 93, 376-394.
- Ooi, S. K., Ooi, C. A., Yeap, J. A. L., & Goh, T. H. (2021). Embracing Bitcoin: users’ perceived security and trust. Quality and Quantity, 55(4), 1219-1237.
- Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12(4), 531-544.
- Polasik, M., Piotrowska, A. I., Wisniewski, T. P., Kotkowski, R., & Lightfoot, G. (2015). Price fluctuations and the use of bitcoin: An empirical inquiry. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 20(1), 9-49.
- Rana, R. L., Giungato, P., Tarabella, A., & Tricase, C. (2019). Blockchain applications and sustainability issues. Amfiteatru Economic, 21(Special Issue No. 13), 861-870.
- Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J.-M. (2015). SmartPLS 3. Bönningstedt: SmartPLS GmbH.
- Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of Innovations (4th ed.). The Free Press.
- Saiedi, E., Broström, A., & Ruiz, F. (2021). Global drivers of cryptocurrency infrastructure adoption. Small Business Economics, 57(1), 353-406.
- Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Hair, J. F. (2020). Partial least squares structural equation modeling. In C. Homburg, M. Klarmann, & A. Vomberg (Eds.), Handbook of Market Research (pp. 1-47). Springer.
- Shahzad, F., Xiu, G. Y., Wang, J., & Shahbaz, M. (2018). An empirical investigation on the adoption of cryptocurrencies among the people of mainland China. Technology in Society, 55, 33-40.
- Sukumaran, S., Bee, T. S., & Wasiuzzaman, S. (2022). Investment in cryptocurrencies: A study of its adoption among Malaysian investors. Journal of Decision Systems, 32(4), 732-760.
- Talukder, M. S., Sorwar, G., Bao, Y., Ahmed, J. U., & Palash, M. A. S. (2020). Predicting antecedents of wearable healthcare technology acceptance by elderly: A combined SEM-Neural Network approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 150, Article 119793.
- Tan, G. W. H., Ooi, K. B., Leong, L. Y., & Lin, B. (2014). Predicting the drivers of behavioral intention to use mobile learning: A hybrid SEM-Neural Networks approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 198-213.
- Ter Ji-Xi, J., Salamzadeh, Y., & Teoh, A. P. (2021). Behavioral intention to use cryptocurrency in Malaysia: an empirical study. Bottom Line, 34(2), 170-197.
- Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273-315.
- Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478.
- Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157-178.
- Venkatesh, V., Thong, J., & Xu, X. (2016). Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology: A Synthesis and the Road Ahead. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 17(5), 328-376.
- Wanner, J., Herm, L.-V., Heinrich, K., & Janiesch, C. (2022). The effect of transparency and trust on intelligent system acceptance: Evidence from a user-based study. Electronic Markets, 32(4), 2079-2102.
- Yeong, Y. C., Kalid, K. S., Savita, K. S., Ahmad, M. N., & Zaffar, M. (2022). Sustainable cryptocurrency adoption assessment among IT enthusiasts and cryptocurrency social communities. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 52(PA), Article 102085.
- Yu, Z. (2022). On the coexistence of cryptocurrency and fiat money. Review of Economic Dynamics.
- Zhao, H., Khaliq, N., Li, C., & Oláh, J. (2024). In quest of perceived transaction cost’s impact on fintech users’ intention: The moderating role of situational factors. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), Article 751.
-
-
Conceptualization
Khurram Ajaz Khan, Jana Prilucikova
-
Formal Analysis
Khurram Ajaz Khan, Mohammed Anam Akhtar, Anita Tangl
-
Investigation
Khurram Ajaz Khan, Mohammed Anam Akhtar, Rohit Kumar Vishwakarma
-
Methodology
Khurram Ajaz Khan, Mohammed Anam Akhtar
-
Resources
Khurram Ajaz Khan, Jana Prilucikova, Rohit Kumar Vishwakarma, Anita Tangl
-
Supervision
Khurram Ajaz Khan, Anita Tangl
-
Visualization
Khurram Ajaz Khan, Mohammed Anam Akhtar, Jana Prilucikova, Rohit Kumar Vishwakarma
-
Writing – original draft
Khurram Ajaz Khan, Mohammed Anam Akhtar, Jana Prilucikova, Rohit Kumar Vishwakarma, Anita Tangl
-
Writing – review & editing
Khurram Ajaz Khan, Mohammed Anam Akhtar, Jana Prilucikova, Anita Tangl
-
Data curation
Mohammed Anam Akhtar, Jana Prilucikova, Rohit Kumar Vishwakarma
-
Software
Mohammed Anam Akhtar
-
Validation
Mohammed Anam Akhtar, Rohit Kumar Vishwakarma
-
Funding acquisition
Anita Tangl
-
Project administration
Anita Tangl
-
Conceptualization
-
Identifying explosive behavioral trace in the CNX Nifty Index: a quantum finance approach
Investment Management and Financial Innovations Volume 15, 2018 Issue #1 pp. 208-223 Views: 4270 Downloads: 6135 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯThe financial markets are found to be finite Hilbert space, inside which the stocks are displaying their wave-particle duality. The Reynolds number, an age old fluid mechanics theory, has been redefined in investment finance domain to identify possible explosive moments in the stock exchange. CNX Nifty Index, a known index on the National Stock Exchange of India Ltd., has been put to the test under this situation. The Reynolds number (its financial version) has been predicted, as well as connected with plausible behavioral rationale. While predicting, both econometric and machine-learning approaches have been put into use. The primary objective of this paper is to set up an efficient econophysics’ proxy for stock exchange explosion. The secondary objective of the paper is to predict the Reynolds number for the future. Last but not least, this paper aims to trace back the behavioral links as well.
-
Neural network time series prediction based on multilayer perceptron
Oleg Rudenko
,
Oleksandr Bezsonov
,
Oleksandr Romanyk
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/dm.5(1).2019.03
Until recently, the statistical approach was the main technique in solving the prediction problem. In the framework of static models, the tasks of forecasting, the identification of hidden periodicity in data, analysis of dependencies, risk assessment in decision making, and others are solved. The general disadvantage of statistical models is the complexity of choosing the type of the model and selecting its parameters. Computing intelligence methods, among which artificial neural networks should be considered at first, can serve as alternative to statistical methods. The ability of the neural network to comprehensively process information follows from their ability to generalize and isolate hidden dependencies between input and output data. Significant advantage of neural networks is that they are capable of learning and generalizing the accumulated knowledge. The article proposes a method of neural networks training in solving the problem of prediction of the time series. Most of the predictive tasks of the time series are characterized by high levels of nonlinearity and non-stationary, noisiness, irregular trends, jumps, abnormal emissions. In these conditions, rigid statistical assumptions about the properties of the time series often limit the possibilities of classical forecasting methods. The alternative methods to statistical methods can be the methods of computational intelligence, which include artificial neural networks. The simulation results confirmed that the proposed method of training the neural network can significantly improve the prediction accuracy of the time series.
-
Determinants of halal food purchase decisions for Go Food and Shopee Food users
Fachrurrozie
,
Muhsin
,
Ahmad Nurkhin
,
Hasan Mukhibad
,
Norzaidi Mohd Daud
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/im.19(1).2023.10
Innovative Marketing Volume 19, 2023 Issue #1 pp. 113-125 Views: 3283 Downloads: 1056 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯIndonesia is one of the world’s biggest halal food product and service consumers. The halal industry will continue to expand as the Muslim community’s needs grow. Therefore, application development for online halal food providers through the Go Food and Shopee Food platforms is in high demand. This paper aims to analyze the determinants of Go Food and Shopee Food users’ halal food purchase decisions. The theory of planned behavior (TPB), the theory of consumer behavior, and the unified theory of acceptance and utilization of technology (UTAUT2) were used. The research sample consists of Go Food and Shopee Food users chosen randomly from a pool of 104 respondents. The data were collected using a questionnaire developed from previous studies and the theories applied (TPB and UTAUT2). Respondents received questionnaires online via Google Forms. Path analysis was used in this study. The findings show that TPB constructs can adequately explain halal food purchase behavior. The attitude toward the purchase of halal food and subjective norms affect the user’s intentions to purchase halal food. The coefficients are 0.291 and 0.379, with a p-value < 0.001. The user’s intention determines the positive decision to purchase halal food with a coefficient of 0.843 and a p-value < 0.001. Halal awareness is a powerful predictor with a coefficient of 0.206 and a p-value of 0.014. However, perceived behavioral control, halal literacy, religious commitment, financial literacy, and UTAUT2 constructs (price value, hedonic motivation, and habit) were not found to determine the intention to purchase halal food.

