The impact of empathetic and flexible leadership behaviors and digital transformation on marketing performance in Vietnamese female-led SMEs: The mediating role of marketing process innovation
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/im.22(4).2026.04
-
Article InfoVolume 22 2026, Issue #4, pp. 44–61
- 8 Views
-
2 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Type of the article: Research Article
Abstract
In the era of rapid digital evolution, navigating the digital paradox remains a critical challenge for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) seeking to convert technological capabilities into commercial outcomes. This study examines the relationships between empathetic and flexible leadership behaviors, digital transformation, and marketing performance through the mediating mechanism of marketing process innovation under varying levels of competitive intensity within female-led SMEs. A cross-sectional survey was administered from May to August 2025 to 265 female enterprise owners and senior executives of registered female-led SMEs in Vietnam, recruited via a structured purposive sampling design. Applying Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), the empirical findings indicate that empathetic and flexible leadership behaviors and digital transformation are significantly associated with marketing process innovation, with leadership behaviors demonstrating the strongest direct relationship (β = 0.376, p < 0.001). Furthermore, marketing process innovation partially mediates the relationship between digital transformation and marketing performance (indirect effect β = 0.103, p < 0.001; total indirect effect of the system confirms structural transmission), while competitive intensity positively moderates the relationship between marketing process innovation and marketing performance (β = 0.104, p < 0.05). Complementary fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA) reveals that high marketing performance is achieved through the configurational alignment of leadership behaviors, digital maturity, and process innovation in highly competitive settings. These findings highlight the strategic value of integrating behavioral adaptability with digital initiatives to optimize marketing processes in female-led enterprises.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)M10, M31, O32
-
References45
-
Tables9
-
Figures3
-
- Figure 1. Conceptual model
- Figure 2. Structural model
- Figure 3. Simple slope plot of the moderating effect of competitive intensity on the relationship between marketing process innovation and marketing performance
-
- Table 1. Operational measurement instrument
- Table 2. Profile of respondents and firms (n = 265)
- Table 3. Measurement model diagnostics: indicator loadings, reliability, convergent validity, and multicollinearity
- Table 4. Discriminant validity assessment (HTMT with 95% bootstrap confidence intervals and Fornell-Larcker criterion)
- Table 5. Structural model path coefficients and hypotheses testing
- Table 6. Mediation analysis (direct, indirect, and total effects with bootstrap CIs)
- Table 7. Explanatory power (R2) and predictive relevance (Q2)
- Table 8. Analysis of necessary conditions (outcome: MP)
- Table 9. Sufficient configurations for high Marketing Performance (MP) and non-high Marketing Performance (~MP)
-
- ADB. (2023). Driving business growth by removing barriers: White book on women-owned small and medium enterprises in Vietnam. Asian Development Bank.
- Barrales-Molina, V., Martínez-lópez, F. J., & Gázquez-abad, J. C. (2013). Dynamic marketing capabilities: Toward an integrative framework. International Journal of Management Reviews.
- Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42(2), 155-162.
- Bharadwaj, A., Sawy, O. A. El, Pavlou, P. A., & Venkatraman, N. (2013). Digital business strategy: Toward a next generation of insights. MIS Quarterly, 37(2), 471-482.
- Birasnav, M., Rangnekar, S., & Dalpati, A. (2011). Transformational leadership and human capital benefits: the role of knowledge management. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 32(2), 106-126.
- Chin, Y. S., Mohamad, A. A., & Lo, M. C. (2025). Digital maturity through the lens of emotional intelligence: Women leaders’ perspective. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 1-17.
- Day, G. S. (2011). Closing the marketing capabilities Gap. American Marketing Association, 75, 183-195.
- Dinh, H. Van, Tran, K. M. T., Nguyen, T. Q., & Vu, M. T. (2024). Digital capabilities and innovation capabilities in Vietnamese SMEs. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 8(2), 1073-1084.
- Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. L. (2003). The female leadership advantage: An evaluation of the evidence. The Leadership Quarterly, 14, 807-834.
- Eagly, A. H., Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C., & Van Engen, M. L. (2003). Transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles: A meta-analysis comparing women and men. Psychological Bulletin, 129(4), 569-591.
- Eagly, A. H., & Johnson, B. T. (1990). Gender and leadership style: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 108(2), 233-256.
- Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350-383.
- Fakhreddin, F., & Foroudi, P. (2022). The impact of market orientation on new product performance through product launch quality: A resource- based view. Cogent Business & Management, 9(1), 2108220.
- General Statistics Office of Vietnam. (2023). Statistical Yearbook of Vietnam 2023. Statistical Publishing House.
- Gunday, G., Ulusoy, G., Kilic, K., & Alpkan, L. (2011). Effects of innovation types on firm performance. International Joural of Production Economics, 133(2), 662-676.
- Gupta, S., Malhotra, N. K., Czinkota, M., & Foroudi, P. (2016). Marketing innovation: A consequence of competitiveness. Journal of Business Research, 69(12), 5671-5681.
- Han, J. K., Kim, N., & Srivastava, R. K. (1998). Market orientation and organizational performance: Is innovation a missing link? Journal of Marketing, 62(4), 30-45.
- Jaworski, B. J., & Kohli, A. K. (1993). Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences. Journal of Marketing, 57(3), 53-70.
- Katsikeas, C. S., Morgan, N. A., Leonidou, L. C., & Hult, G. T. M. (2016). Assessing performance outcomes in marketing. Journal of Marketing, 80, 1-20.
- Mikalef, P., Conboy, K., Lundström, J. E., & Popovič, A. (2022). Thinking responsibly about responsible AI and ‘the dark side’ of AI. European Journal of Information Systems, 31(3), 257-268.
- Naidoo, V. (2010). Firm survival through a crisis: The influence of market orientation, marketing innovation and business strategy. Industrial Marketing Management, 39(8), 1311-1320.
- Nambisan, S., Lyytinen, K., Majchrzak, A., & Song, M. (2017). Digital innovation management: Reinventing innovation management research in a digital world. MIS Quarterly, 41(1), 223-238.
- Nambisan, S., Wright, M., & Feldman, M. (2019). The digital transformation of innovation and entrepreneurship: Progress, challenges and key themes. Research Policy, 48(8), 103773.
- Narver, J. C., & Slater, S. F. (1990). The effect of a market orientation on business profitability. Journal of Marketing, 54(4), 20-35.
- Ngo, L. V., & O’Cass, A. (2012a). In search of innovation and customer-related performance superiority: The role of market orientation, marketing capability, and innovation capability interactions. Product Development & Management Association, 29(5), 861-877.
- Ngo, L. V., & O’Cass, A. (2012b). Innovation and business success: The mediating role of customer participation. Journal of Business Research, 1-9.
- Nijssen, E. J., & Frambach, R. T. (2001). Creating customer value through strategic marketing planning. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.
- OECD and Eurostat. (2018). Oslo manual 2018: The measurement of scientific, technological and innovation activities (4th ed.). OECD Publishing.
- Oliver, A. G., Pfarrer, M. D., & Neville, F. (2024). Grand challenges and female leaders: An exploration of relational leadership during the COVID-19 pandemic. Business & Society, 63(4), 954-987.
- Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.
- Ragin, C. C. (2008). Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond. University of Chicago Press.
- Riggio, R. E. (1986). Assessment of basic social skills. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(3), 649-660.
- Sebastian, I. M., Mocker, M., Ross, J. W., Moloney, K. G., Beath, C., & Fonstad, N. O. (2017). How big old companies navigate digital transformation. MIS Quarterly Executive, 16(3), 197-214.
- Soto-Acosta, P. (2020). COVID-19 pandemic: Shifting digital transformation to a high-speed gear. Information Systems Management, 37(4), 260-266.
- Svahn, F., Mathiassen, L., & Lindgren, R. (2017). Embracing digital innovation in incumbent firms. MIS Quarterly, 41(1), 239-253.
- Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319-1350.
- Teece, D. J. (2018). Business models and dynamic capabilities. Long Range Planning, 51(1), 40-49.
- Tran, N. M., & Nguyen, T. H. (2022). Women’s leadership and SMEs’ CSR performance: Family versus nonfamily firms. Cogent Business & Management, 9(1), 1-19.
- Vaska, S., Massaro, M., Bagarotto, E. M., & Mas, F. D. (2021). The digital transformation of business model innovation: A structured literature review. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1-18.
- Verhoef, P. C., Broekhuizen, T., Bart, Y., Bhattacharya, A., Qi Dong, J., Fabian, N., & Haenlein, M. (2021). Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 122, 889-901.
- Vial, G. (2019). Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(2), 118-144.
- Walsh, J., Nguyen, T. Q., & Hoang, T. (2023). Digital transformation in Vietnamese SMEs: Managerial implications. Journal of Internet and Digital Economics, 3(1/2), 18-32.
- Wang, C. L., & Ahmed, P. K. (2004). The development and validation of the organisational innovativeness construct using confirmatory factor analysis. European Journal of Innovation Management, 7(4), 303-313.
- Warner, K. S. R., & Wäger, M. (2019). Building dynamic capabilities for digital transformation: An ongoing process of strategic renewal. Long Range Planning, 52(3), 326-349.
- Westerman, G., Bonnet, D., & McAfee, A. (2014). Leading Digital: Turning Technology into Business Transformation. Harvard Business Review Press.


