Sustainable urban development: An integrated assessment of Kazakhstani cities
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ee.17(4).2026.05
-
Article InfoVolume 17 2026, Issue #4, pp. 63–76
- 10 Views
-
1 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Type of the article: Research Article
Abstract
Rapid urbanization has increased pressure on urban systems, creating challenges related to resource efficiency, waste management, and environmental protection. These challenges are particularly acute for Kazakhstan, where cities differ substantially in their resource use, environmental conditions, infrastructure, and socioeconomic characteristics. This study aims to conduct a comparative assessment and identify the key characteristics of urban metabolic profiles and sustainable development in Kazakhstani cities. A simplified resource-flow assessment and a comprehensive urban sustainability assessment were conducted for 13 cities in Kazakhstan using 2021 data, the recent year with the most comprehensive and comparable city-level data for both assessment approaches. The results demonstrate substantial heterogeneity in sustainable development performance. The integral sustainability index ranges from 0.28 for Karagandy to 0.71 for Aktau. Five of the 13 cities demonstrate a moderately high level of sustainability (Aktau, Zhezkazgan, Pavlodar, Petropavl, and Taraz), while eight have a moderately low level. The environmental, infrastructure, and socioeconomic sub-indices range from 0.29 to 0.94, 0.25 to 0.75, and 0.00 to 0.86, respectively, indicating pronounced differences in environmental conditions, infrastructure, and socioeconomic capacity. The study of metabolic profiles and risks to sustainable development took into account the availability and quality of energy resources consumed, water consumption and availability, and air quality. The prevalence of precarious employment and wage levels were considered as indirect indicators of the intensity of metabolic processes. Groups of cities with limited access to cleaner thermal energy sources, industrial cities, cities with socioeconomic vulnerability, and cities with moderate water balances were identified. Based on these profiles, recommendations were formulated to support more integrated urban development.
Acknowledgment
This paper was prepared with the financial support of the Committee of Science of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Kazakhstan (Grant AP26101517).
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)R00, Q01, Q50
-
References49
-
Tables5
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Data for comparative resource-flow profile of Kazakhstani cities
- Table 2. Indicators of the Urban Sustainability Index (USI)
- Table 3. Comparative resource-flow assessments of Kazakhstani cities
- Table 4. Normalized indicators of the Urban Sustainability Index
- Table 5. Comprehensive assessment of urban sustainability
-
- Allan, P., & Bryant, M. (2011). Resilience as a framework for urbanism and recovery. Journal of Landscape Architecture, 6(2), 34-45.
- Anker, R., & Anker, M. (2017). Living wages around the world. Manual for measurement. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
- ARUP. (2019). City Resilience Index: Understanding and measuring city resilience.
- Atakhanova, Z., & Baigaliyeva, M. (2025). Kazakhstan’s infrastructure programs and urban sustainability analysis of Astana. Urban Science, 9(4), Article 100.
- Bahers, J.-P., Tanguy, A., & Pincetl, S. (2020). Metabolic relationships between cities and hinterland: A political-industrial ecology of energy metabolism of Saint-Nazaire metropolitan and port area (France). Ecological Economics, 167, Article 106447.
- Barles, S. (2010). Society, energy and materials: The contribution of urban metabolism studies to sustainable urban development issues. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 53(4), 439-455.
- Barles, S. (2009). Urban metabolism of Paris and its region. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 13(6), 898-913.
- Blancas, F., & Contreras, I. (2025). Global SDG composite indicator: A new methodological proposal that combines compensatory and non-compensatory aggregations. Sustainable Development, 33(1), 158-176.
- BNS. (2025a). On the operation of water supply and sanitation systems in the Republic of Kazakhstan for 2025: Series 4. Environmental statistics.
- BNS. (2025b). Monitoring of the Sustainable Development Goals until 2030.
- Broto, V., Allen, A., & Rapoport, E. (2012). Interdisciplinary perspectives on urban metabolism. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 16(6), 851-861.
- Brüning-González, М., Arroyo, J., Marquet, P., & Samaniego, H. (2025). The science of urban metabolism and sustainability. arXiv.
- Brunner, P., & Rechberger, H. (2016). Handbook of material flow analysis: For environmental, resource, and waste engineers (2nd ed.). Boca Raton: CRC Press.
- Deng, T., Zhang, Y., & Fu, C. (2023). Modelling dynamic interactions between material flow and stock: A review of dynamic material flow analysis. Ecological Indicators, 156, Article 111098.
- Desogus, E., Bompard, E., & Grosso, D. (2024). A composite index for tracking the evolution towards energy transition at urban scale: The Turin case study. Energies, 17(6), Article 1281.
- Eurostat. (2018). Economy-wide Material Flow Accounts (EW-MFA): Compilation Guide. Luxembourg: Eurostat.
- Ferretto, L., Lucertini, G., & Brigolin, D. (2024). LCA for territorial metabolism analysis: An application to organic waste management planning. Journal of Cleaner Production, 441, Article 141051.
- García-Guaita, F., González-García, S., Villanueva-Ray, P., Moreira, M., & Feijoo, G. (2018). Integrating urban metabolism, material flow analysis and life cycle assessment in the environmental evaluation of Santiago de Compostela. Sustainable Cities and Society, 40, 569-580.
- Guo, Y., Yu, M., & See, K. (2024). Developing a sustainable development goals index for OECD countries: An effectiveness-based hierarchical data envelopment analysis. Environmental Science & Policy, 160, Article 103836.
- 20. Hoogzaad, J. (2019). Circular Almaty. A metabolic approach to define a resource efficient and low-carbon future for the city. Almaty.
- 22. Kennedy, C., Cuddihy, J., & Engel-Yan, J. (2007). The changing metabolism of cities. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 11, 43-59.
- Kennedy, C., Pincetl, S., & Bunje, P. (2011). The study of urban metabolism and its applications to urban planning and design. Environmental Pollution, 159(8-9), 1965-1973.
- Kerimray, А., De Miglio, R., Rojas-Solórzano, L., & Ó Gallachóir, B. (2018). Causes of energy poverty in a cold and resource-rich country: Evidence from Kazakhstan. Local Environment, 23(2), 178-197.
- Kim, B., Lee, G.-S., Kim, M., Lee, W.-S., & Choi, H. (2023). Developing and applying an urban resilience index for the evaluation of declining areas: A case study of South Korea’s urban regeneration sites. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20, Article 3653.
- Lützkendorf, T., & Balouktsi, M. (2017). Assessing a sustainable urban development: Typology of indicators and sources of information. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 38, 546-553.
- Muñoz, E., & Navia, R. (2018). Urban metabolism as a key method to assess sustainability of cities. Waste Management & Research: The Journal for a Sustainable Circular Economy, 36(8), 661-662.
- Murphy, E., Walsh, P., & Murphy, E. (2023). An evidence-based approach to national Sustainable Development Goal assessment: The case of Ireland. PLOS Sustain Transform, 2(10), Article e0000082.
- Murray, A., Skene, K., & Haynes, K. (2017). The circular economy: An interdisciplinary exploration of the concept and application in a global context. Journal of Business Ethics, 140, 369-380.
- Narieswari, L., Sitorus, S., Hardjomidjojo, H., & Putri, E. (2019). Multi-dimensions urban resilience index for sustainable city. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 399, Article 012020.
- OECD. (2008). Handbook on constructing composite indicators: Methodology and user guide. Paris: OECD Publishing.
- OECD. (2020). Cities in the world: A new perspective on urbanisation. Paris: OECD Publishing.
- OECD. (2022). OECD Regions and Cities at a Glance 2022. Paris: OECD Publishing.
- Pakina, A., & Mukhamedina, M. (2023). Urban metabolism assessment in the context of sustainability: The case of Nur-Sultan city (Kazakhstan). Journal of Sustainable Development of Energy, Water and Environment Systems, 11(1), Article 1100432.
- Reike, D., Vermeulen, W., & Witjes, S. (2018). The circular economy: New or Refurbished as CE 3.0? – Exploring controversies in the conceptualization of the circular economy through a focus on history and resource value retention options. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 135, 246-264.
- Roemers, G. (2024, June 18). Applying material flow analysis to develop circular cities. Metabolic.
- Siemens. (2012). The green city index: A summary of the green city index research series. Munich: Siemens AG.
- Silva, A., Augusto, B., Rafael, S., Reis, J., Lopes, M., Costa, S., & Borrego, C. (2020). Modelling of regional economic metabolism. Climate, 8(4), Article 52.
- Singh, A. (2024). Urban resilience and sustainability: A comprehensive review. Journal of Sustainable Solutions, 15(2), 33-38.
- Sviden, J., & Jonsson, A. (2001). Urban metabolism of mercury turnover, emissions and stock in Stockholm 1795–1995. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution: Focus, 1, 179-196.
- Talandier, M., & Donsimoni, M. (2022). Industrial metabolism and territorial development of the Maurienne Valley in France. Regional Environmental Change, 22.
- UN. (2015). The Sustainable Development Goals.
- UN. (2026). SDG Indicators Metadata repository.
- UN-Habitat. (2020). World cities report 2020: The value of sustainable urbanization. Nairobi: UN-Habitat.
- Verger, Y., Petit, C., Barles, S., Billene, G., Garnier, J., Esculierd, F., & Maugis, P. (2018). A N, P, C and water flows metabolism study in a peri-urban territory in France. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 137, 200-213.
- Wolman, A. (1965). The metabolism of cities. Scientific American, 213(3), 179-190.
- World Bank. (2021). Climate risk country profiles Kazakhstan.
- Xu, Y., Keivani, R., & Cao, A. (2018). Urban sustainability indicators re-visited: Lessons from property-led urban development in China. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 36(4), 308-322.
- Zhang, Y. (2013). Urban metabolism: A review of research methodologies. Environmental Pollution, 178, 463-473.


