Macroeconomic drivers of CO₂ emissions reduction in a transition economy: From residential extrapolation to municipal policy scaling
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ee.17(3).2026.08
-
Article InfoVolume 17 2026, Issue #3, pp. 125–137
- 8 Views
-
2 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Type of the article: Research Article
Abstract
This study aims to assess a macroeconomic methodological approach for evaluating the impact of investment activity, energy efficiency, energy costs, and renewable energy development on CO₂ emissions in Ukraine, using the model’s insights for a conceptual extrapolation to the residential sector with subsequent policy scaling to the municipal building stock. The methodological basis is a top-down approach using econometric modeling (OLS) for 2002–2021, which represents the pre-war period in Ukraine. All estimations are based on aggregated macroeconomic proxy indicators and not on direct residential or municipal emissions measurement data due to a lack of reliable information. The results demonstrate that macroeconomic energy efficiency is the most powerful driver of decarbonization. An analysis of the residential sector indicates that higher household financial burdens associated with higher utility expenditures are statistically connected with lower CO₂ emissions, which may reflect demand-side adjustments in energy consumption, including price-driven savings. However, other factors, such as energy inefficiency or energy poverty, may also add to this relationship. In contrast, traditional investment activity still contributes to growing carbon footprints, with CO₂ emissions rising by 136 kg per 1% increase in gross capital formation as a share of GDP. At the same time, the estimated coefficients for global oil prices and the share of renewable energy exhibit the expected negative signs, suggesting economically meaningful long-term decarbonization tendencies. However, these relationships do not reach conventional statistical significance and should therefore be interpreted as directional trends rather than statistically confirmed effects.
Acknowledgments
This paper is funded by the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine within the projects “Comprehensive vertically integrated intelligent system for monitoring and regulating energy supply in municipal sector buildings” (No. 0126U000867) and “Drivers and barriers to human capital transformation for a circular and green economy” (No. 0126U001080).
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)Q42, Q43, Q48
-
References37
-
Tables1
-
Figures2
-
- Figure 1. Modeling the drivers of decarbonization in Ukraine (Specification 1)
- Figure 2. Modeling the impact of macroeconomic energy efficiency (Specification 2)
-
- Table 1. Descriptive statistics of the variables for Ukraine (2002–2021)
-
- Altın, H. (2024). The impact of energy efficiency and renewable energy consumption on carbon emissions in G7 countries. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 17(1), 134-142.
- Bilan, Y., Samusevych, Y., Lyeonov, S., Strzelec, M., & Tenytska, I. (2022). The keys to clean energy technology: Impact of environmental taxes on biofuel production and consumption. Energies, 15(24), Article 9470.
- Eurostat. (2023, August 16). EU economy greenhouse gas emissions: −3% in Q1 2023.
- Eurostat. (2025, June 25). Energy use in EU households down second year in a row.
- Ewald, J., Sterner, T., Ó Broin, E., & Mata, É. (2021). Saving energy in residential buildings: The role of energy pricing. Climatic Change, 167, Article 18.
- Firstová, J., & Vysochyna, A. (2024). Optimisation of socio-economic, environmental and public health determinants of national security for post-pandemic recovery. Health Economics and Management Review, 5(1), 67-79.
- Knez, S., Šimić, G., Milovanović, A., & Županič, F. (2022). Prices of conventional and renewable energy as determinants of sustainable and secure energy development: Regression model analysis. Energy, Sustainability and Society, 12, Article 6.
- Kongkuah, W., & Alessa, L. (2025). Renewable energy and carbon intensity: Global evidence from 184 countries (2000–2020). Energies, 18(13), Article 3236.
- Kubatko, O., Kurbatova, T., & Sotnyk, I. (2025). Energy efficiency, decarbonization and renewable energy in Ukraine [Data set]. Zenodo.
- Kurbatova T., & Skibina, T. (2019). Renewable energy policy in Ukraine’s household sector: Measures, outcomes and challenges. In IEEE International Conference on Modern Electrical and Energy Systems (pp. 234-237). Kremenchuk, Ukraine.
- Kurbatova, T., & Khlyap, H. (2015). GHG emissions and economic measures for low carbon growth in Ukraine. Carbon Management, 6(1-2), 7-17.
- Kurbatova, T., Sotnyk, I., Kubatko, O., Prokopenko, O., Pysmenna, U., & Kozmenko, Ye. (2025). Convergence and divergence patterns in Ukraine’s household solar energy development: Policy implications. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 23(4), 326-340.
- Li, R., Xin, Y., Sotnyk, I., Kubatko, O., Almashaqbeh, I., Fedyna, S., & Prokopenko, O. (2021). Energy poverty and energy efficiency in emerging economies. International Journal of Environment and Pollution, 69(1-2), 1-21.
- Li, S., Hua, J., & Chi, X. (2025). Assessing decarbonisation pathways in Qinghai Province, China: An analysis based on the extended STIRPAT model and data visualisation. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 13, Article 1513751.
- Liu, Y., Yang, L., Wu, M., He, J., Wang, W., Li, Y., Huang, R., Liu, D., & Tan, H. (2025a). Model construction and scenario analysis for carbon dioxide emissions from energy consumption in Jiangsu province: based on the STIRPAT extended model. Sustainability, 17(19), Article 8961.
- Liu, J., Zhang, S., Ma, M., He, Y., & Wang, B. (2025b). From energy efficiency to carbon neutrality: A global bibliometric review of energy conservation and emission reduction in building stock. Buildings, 15(12), Article 2051.
- Mentel, G., Vasilyeva, T., Samusevych, Y., Vysochyna, A., Karbach, R., & Streimikis, J. (2020). The evaluation of economic, environmental and energy security: Composite approach. International Journal of Global Environmental Issues, 19(1/2/3), 177-197.
- OECD. (2014). Greening household behaviour: Overview from the 2011 survey – Revised edition. Paris: OECD Publishing.
- Rahman, Z., & Ahmad, M. (2019). Modeling the relationship between gross capital formation and CO2 (a)symmetrically in the case of Pakistan: An empirical analysis through NARDL approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(8), 8111-8124.
- Rao, A., Aloulou, M., Dagar, V., & Yadav, A. (2026). Economic sustainability and institutional quality in the green energy transition: Evidence from developing economies. International Economics, 185, Article 100669.
- Raza, M., Aman, M., Kumar, L., Al-Khasawneh, M., Faheem, M., & Ehyaei, M. (2025). Carbon neutrality and economic stability nexus: An integrated renewable energy transition to decarbonize the energy sector. Energy Reports, 13, 4586-4608.
- Rui, L., Jiang, H., Sotnyk, I., Kubatko, O., & Almashaqbeh, Y. (2020). The CO2 emissions drivers of post-communist economies in Eastern Europe and Central Asia. Atmosphere, 11(9), Article 1019.
- Saher, L., Vakulenko, I., & Oleksich, Zh. (2025). What makes growth inclusive? Cluster based insights for EU member states. Business Ethics and Leadership, 9(3), 275-289.
- Satrovic, E., Muslija, A., & Abul, S. (2020). The relationship between CO2 emissions and gross capital formation in Turkey and Kuwait. South East European Journal of Economics and Business, 15(2), 28-42.
- Shan, R., Lai, W., Tang, H., Leng, X., & Gu, W. (2025). Residential building renovation considering energy, carbon emissions, and cost: An approach integrating machine learning and evolutionary generation. Applied Sciences, 15(4), Article 1830.
- Smiech, L., Kurbatova, T., Kubatko, O., Sotnyk, I., Trypolska, G., & Perederii, T. (2025). Assessing the impact of household energy efficiency and renewable energy developments on energy poverty reduction. Environmental Economics, 16(4), 83-94.
- Sotnyk, I., Kurbatova, T., Kubatko, O., Baranchenko, Y., & Li, R. (2021). The price for sustainable development of renewable energy sector: The case of Ukraine. In International Conference on Sustainable Futures: Environmental, Technological, Social and Economic Matters. Kryvyi Rih, Ukraine.
- Srivastava, S., Shetty, L., Dwivedi, A., Agrawal, D., Patil, A., & Pamucar, D. (2026). Net zero transition towards decarbonization in context of energy sector. Economics, 14(1).
- State Statistics Service of Ukraine. (n.d.). Complex statistical publications. Statistical yearbooks of Ukraine.
- Stockholm Environment Institute (SEI). (2023). National comprehensive assessment: Ukraine – Buildings and renovation.
- Sultana, A., Chowdhury, A. A. A., Rafi, A. H., & All Noman, A. (2025). Role of AI innovation, clean energy and digital economy towards net zero emission in the United States: An ARDL approach. Journal of Environmental and Energy Economics, 4(1), 1-21.
- Sun, X., Liu, T., Zhai, Y., Zhang, Y., & Shi, H. (2025). The impact of fossil energy prices on carbon emissions: The dual mediation of energy efficiency and renewable energy. Energies, 18(23), Article 6186.
- Tu, Z., Fen, C., & Zhao, X. (2022). Revisiting energy efficiency and energy related CO2 emissions: Evidence from RCEP economies. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 35(1), 5858-5878.
- Wei, W., & Harrison, M. (2021). Residential net-zero energy buildings: Review and perspective. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 142, Article 10859.
- World Bank. (n.d.). World development indicators. World Bank Open Data.
- York, R., Rosa, E., & Dietz, T. (2003). STIRPAT, IPAT and ImPACT: Analytic tools for unpacking the driving forces of environmental impacts. Ecological Economics, 46(3), 351-365.
- Zheng, J., Dang, Y., & Assad, U. (2024). Household energy consumption, energy efficiency, and household income – Evidence from China. Applied Energy, 353, Article 122074.


