Assessing the efficiency of renewable energy policies: A DEA, machine learning, and panel data approach
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ee.17(2).2026.17
-
Article InfoVolume 17 2026, Issue #2, pp. 261-279
- 16 Views
-
3 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Type of the article: Research Article
Abstract
The accelerating energy transition and uneven effectiveness of renewable energy policies across OECD member, accession, and key partner countries covered by the OECD policy database highlight the need to understand which policy designs deliver efficient outcomes. This study aims to assess how different regulatory policy instruments and their combinations influence the efficiency with which countries convert policy stringency inputs into renewable electricity generation outcomes. The analysis uses panel data for 47 countries over 2000–2023, combining Data Envelopment Analysis, Random Forest modeling, and fixed-effects regressions with lagged variables. The results show that the average DEA efficiency score is 0.348 (median = 0.258), indicating substantial underperformance relative to the best-practice frontier. Random Forest results reveal that structural factors dominate, with energy intensity (IncNodePurity = 2.53 × 10–12) and GDP per capita (1.44 × 10–12) exhibiting the highest variable importance scores. Among policy instruments, feed-in tariffs, renewable energy auctions, and emission standards have the most robust positive associations. Interaction effects indicate complementarity, with the joint impact of feed-in tariffs and auctions being positive and significant. In contrast, most individual instruments show limited or insignificant effects, confirming that policy effectiveness depends on coordinated policy mixes and structural conditions rather than isolated measures.
Acknowledgment
This article was prepared based on the results of the project 101127491- EnergyS4UA-ERASMUS-JMO2023-HEI-TCH-RSCH. Views and opinions expressed are, however, those of the authors only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or European Education and Culture Executive Agency. Neither the European Union nor the granting authority can be held responsible for them.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)Q42, Q48, Q58, C14
-
References52
-
Tables6
-
Figures3
-
- Figure 1. The graphical representation of variable importance derived from the Random Forest model
- Figure 2. Random Forest variable importance plot
- Figure 3. Partial dependence plot
-
- Table 1. Random Forest variable importance for DEA efficiency
- Table 2. Fixed-effects quadratic model for feed-in tariffs and DEA efficiency
- Table 3. Fixed-effects model for DEA efficiency with lagged policy variables
- Table 4. Fixed-effects model with policy interaction effects
- Table 5. Fixed-effects quadratic models for auctions and planning policies
- Table A1. Descriptive statistics of variables (47 OECD member, accession, and key partner countries, 2000–2023)
-
- AlNaqbi, E., & Mohd Shamsudin, F. (2024). Greening the UAE workforce: Can green human resource management and domestic environmental regulations support green innovation at the workplace? Problems and Perspectives in Management, 22(1), 593-604.
- Alper, F. O., Alper, A. E., Mike, F., & Kızılkaya, O. (2026). Environmental policy stringency and fossil energy trade in OECD countries. Discover Environment, 4(1), Article 31.
- Badreddine, A., & Larbi Cherif, H. (2024). Public health improvement by reducing air pollution: A strategy for the transition to renewable energy. Health Economics and Management Review, 5(1), 1-14.
- Barcelona, R. G. (2025). Asserting business leadership: How decisionmakers shift strategic advantages and appropriate value under ambiguities. Business Ethics and Leadership, 9(3), 337-357.
- Bi, G.-B., Song, W., Zhou, P., & Liang, L. (2014). Does environmental regulation affect energy efficiency in China's thermal power generation? Empirical evidence from a slacks-based DEA model. Energy Policy, 66, 537-546.
- Burrell, D. N., Wansi, T., Morin, S. L., Rahim, E., Tessema, D. B., Alemu, B. A., Harris, N., & Conley, L. (2025). Harnessing behavioral economics, green promotions, and financial incentives as catalysts for sustainable practices. Green Transition and Sustainable Development, 1(1), 1-16.
- Cui, T., & Yuan, W. (2025). Analysis of the nonlinear impact of climate policy uncertainty on total factor carbon productivity in Chinese cities. Sustainability, 17(24), Article 11069.
- Ferenczi Vaňová, A., Krajcirova, R., Cheben, J., Munk, M., & Tóth, T. (2026). Why environmental taxation fails to converge in the European Union: Evidence of structural divergence across the EU 27. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 21(1), 95-141.
- Fernandes, K., Marathe, S. R., Parab, S., Amonkar, V., Vernekar, G., & Pandhre, S. S. (2025). Evaluating the role of government expenditure in promoting renewable energy and economic growth in India. Environmental Economics, 16(2), 162-172.
- Fischer, C., & Newell, R. G. (2008). Environmental and technology policies for climate mitigation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 55(2), 142-162.
- Godawska, J., & Wyrobek, J. (2021). The impact of environmental policy stringency on renewable energy production in the Visegrad group countries. Energies, 14(19), Article 6225.
- Halynskyi, D., & Telizhenko, O. (2024). Fair business leadership: Is protecting minority investors important to the development of start-ups in clean and digital energy? Business Ethics and Leadership, 8(4), 57-68.
- Havrylenko, O., & Myroshnychenko, I. (2025). Does renewable energy enhance energy security? Evidence from a Granger causality analysis of countries in the context of geopolitical risks and socioeconomic challenges. SocioEconomic Challenges, 9(2), 207-219.
- Horbach, J., Rammer, C., & Rennings, K. (2012). Determinants of eco-innovations by type of environmental impact – The role of regulatory push/pull, technology push and market pull. Ecological Economics, 78, 112-122.
- International Energy Agency (IEA). (2025, October 7). Renewables 2025. Paris.
- International Energy Agency (IEA). (2026, April 20). Global Energy Review 2026. Paris.
- International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA), & Climate Policy Initiative (CPI). (2025). Global landscape of energy transition finance 2025. Abu Dhabi: IRENA.
- International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA). (2025). Renewable capacity statistics 2025. Abu Dhabi.
- Jaffe, A. B., & Stavins, R. N. (1995). Dynamic incentives of environmental regulations: The effects of alternative policy instruments on technology diffusion. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 29(3), S43-S63.
- Johnstone, N., Haščič, I., & Popp, D. (2009). Renewable energy policies and technological innovation: Evidence based on patent counts. Environmental and Resource Economics, 45(1), 133-155.
- Krause, J., Myroshnychenko, I., Tiutiunyk, S., & Latysh, D. (2024). Financial instruments of the green energy transition: Research landscape analysis. Financial Markets, Institutions and Risks, 8(2), 198-212.
- Kuzior, A., Kovalenko, Y., Tiutiunyk, I., & Hrytsenko, L. (2025). Assessment of the energy security of EU countries in light of the expansion of renewable energy sources. Energies, 18(8), Article 2126.
- Lyeonov, S., & Moroz, A. (2025). Financial instruments for renewable energy incentives: A cluster-based analysis of feed-in tariffs and power purchase agreements. Financial Markets, Institutions and Risks, 9(1), 123-139.
- Lyeonov, S., Kulawiecka, E., Krawczyk, D., & Oláh, J. (2025a). Decarbonisation and informality: Empirical evidence on the shadow economy response to climate policy mix. Economics & Sociology, 18(3), 274-295.
- Lyeonov, S., Moroz, A., Dudzik, I., & Chuluunbaatar, E. (2025b). Green rules & grey markets: Do environmental policies influence the informal economy? Economics & Sociology, 18(1), 313-338.
- Nilsson, M., Zamparutti, T., Petersen, J. E., Nykvist, B., Rudberg, P., & McGuinn, J. (2012). Understanding policy coherence: Analytical framework and examples of sector-environment policy interactions in the EU. Environmental Policy and Governance, 22(6), 395-423.
- Ntshangase, B. A., Makole, K. R., & Msosa, S. K. (2024). Overcoming the socio-economic challenges to good governance: Streamlining cooperative governance model. SocioEconomic Challenges, 8(4), 19-30.
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2025). OECD Regulatory Policy Outlook 2025. Paris: OECD Publishing.
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (n.d.). OECD data Explorer.
- Patnaik, B., & Hedau, A. (2026). Sustainable infrastructure investment: Financial drivers, policy dynamics and socio-economic challenges. SocioEconomic Challenges, 10(1), 27-41.
- Pimenow, S., Pimenowa, O., Sitnicki, M. W., Dluhopolskyi, O., & Zieliński, M. (2026). Energy use, costs and economic resilience of EU agriculture: The role and potential of CAP eco-schemes in reducing energy intensity. Energies, 19(4), Article 1016.
- Roelfsema, M., van Soest, H. L., Harmsen, M., van Vuuren, D. P., Bertram, C., den Elzen, M., Höhne, N., Iacobuta, G., Krey, V., Kriegler, E., Luderer, G., Riahi, K., Ueckerdt, F., Després, J., Drouet, L., Emmerling, J., Frank, S., Fricko, O., Gidden, M., ... Vishwanathan, S. S. (2020). Taking stock of national climate policies to evaluate implementation of the Paris Agreement. Nature Communications, 11(1).
- Sahu, A., Kumar, A., & Kumar, A. (2026). Dynamic impact of macroeconomic and financial stress factors on clean energy index performance: Evidence from an ARDL analysis. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 23(1), 424-433.
- Shanyazov, N., Saidov, D., Babajanov, J., Karimboev, D., Niyozmetov, D., Mamadiyarov, Z., & Djumabayeva, S. (2026). Transport sustainability governance and green growth in the EU-27: Evidence from panel CS-ARDL and MMQR models. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 24(2), 89-102.
- Shcherbakova, O. (2025). Do feed-in tariffs unlock green finance? A panel study of banking sector assets and renewable energy consumption across 66 countries around the world. Banks and Bank Systems, 20(3), 27-44.
- Sira, M., & Kuzior, A. (2025). Digitalization of government management processes in the context of sustainable development. Management Systems in Production Engineering, 33(2), 289-310.
- Sitnicki, M. W., Iwanowska, B., Kapranov, Y., Klapkiv, J., Dluhopolskyi, O., Panasyuk, V., & Halynskyi, D. (2026a). Digitalisation and entrepreneurial ecosystems as drivers of energy start-ups: Evidence from cross-country panel data. Sustainability, 18(11), Article 5475.
- Sitnicki, M. W., Serhiienko, R., Halynskyi, D., & Zhytar, M. (2026b). Economic freedom and the dynamics of energy start-ups: Cross-country evidence on green and digital entrepreneurship and financing. Journal of International Studies, 19(1), 255-279.
- Stadniichuk, R., Popovych, R., Rahmanov, F., Garafonova, O., & Krymchak, L. (2025). Institutional mechanisms and ethical leadership as factors of reducing entropy in the system of economic security and regulation of social conflicts. Business Ethics and Leadership, 9(3), 211-226.
- Štreimikienė, D. (2024). Renewable energy penetration in Nordic and Baltic countries of the EU. Journal of International Studies, 17(1), 97-107.
- Taušová, M., Tauš, P., & Domaracká, L. (2022). Sustainable development according to resource productivity in the EU environmental policy context. Energies, 15(12), Article 4291.
- The Heritage Foundation. (n.d.). Index of economic freedom: Explore the data – All country scores.
- To, M. H., & Tran, B. M. (2025). Environmental regulatory stringency and corporate reporting quality: Evidence from waste, emissions, water, and energy regulations in Vietnamese firms. Environmental Economics, 16(3), 67-81.
- Trinh, L. D. (2025). Renewable energy and sustainable development: Evidence from lower middle-income countries. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 20(3), 905-926.
- Türüç-Seraj, F., Pervar, A., Üçışık-Erbilen, S., & Seraj, M. (2026). Green governance and energy transition: A quantile-on-quantile analysis of renewable energy, policy, and innovation effects on carbon emissions. Sustainability, 18(2), Article 1127.
- Vasa, L., Kubatko, O., Sotnyk, I., Piven, V., Trypolska, G., & Pysmenna, U. (2024). Economic and environmental drivers of renewable energy transition in the EU. Environmental Economics, 15(2), 232-245.
- Vasylieva, T., Derkacz, A., Popp, J., & Horsch, A. (2025a). From energy dependency to energy security: How the war in Ukraine accelerated renewable deployment in Europe. Economics and Sociology, 18(3), 229-253.
- Vasylieva, T., Gutowski, P., & Smiech, L. (2025b). Dynamic inflation responses to war-related electricity shocks: DTW-based evidence from European energy and renewables regimes. Journal of International Studies, 18(4), 180-203.
- Wołowiec, T., Kolosok, S., Vasylieva, T., Artyukhov, A., Skowron, Ł., Dluhopolskyi, O., & Sergiienko, L. (2022). Sustainable governance, energy security, and energy losses of Europe in turbulent times. Energies, 15(23), Article 8857.
- World Bank. (n.d.) Indicators.
- Yoshimori, M. (2024). Global cooperation for reducing carbon emissions: The role of carbon taxes. Financial Markets, Institutions and Risks, 8(3), 69-79.
- Yu, J., Shi, X., Guo, D., & Yang, L. (2021). Economic policy uncertainty (EPU) and firm carbon emissions: Evidence using a China provincial EPU index. Energy Economics, 94, Article 105071.


