Audit committee and financial reporting quality in an emerging market: Evidence from regulatory reform in Vietnam

  • 24 Views
  • 3 Downloads

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Type of the article: Research Article

Abstract
In developing economies with weak institutional enforcement, the dependability of financial reporting remains a significant issue for investors and regulators. This study examines the relationship between audit committee attributes and the quality of financial reporting among non-financial publicly listed companies in Vietnam, an emerging economy where the Vietnamese government officially established audit committees as a new governance structure through Enterprise Law No. 59/2020/QH14, which replaces the mostly ceremonial Supervisory Board model. A balanced panel dataset comprising 455 firm-year observations from companies listed on the Ho Chi Minh Stock Exchange and Hanoi Stock Exchange between 2018 and 2022 is utilized. A binary logistic regression model is employed to assess whether the presence and effectiveness of audit committees improve financial reporting quality, indicated by the receipt of unqualified audit opinions and the timely disclosure of financial statements. The results show a strong positive link between having an audit committee and the quality of financial reporting (odds ratio = 23.415, p < 0.001). This means that companies with a formal audit committee are about 23 times more likely to have better reporting quality. In addition, the chairperson’s professional expertise (odds ratio = 1.477, p < 0.05) and the frequency of audit committee meetings (odds ratio = 1.156, p < 0.05) both have a big effect on better reporting outcomes. These findings suggest that governance effectiveness, rather than mere formal adoption, is the primary determinant of reporting quality in weak institutional environments.

view full abstract hide full abstract
    • Table 1. Variable definitions and measurements
    • Table 2. Descriptive statistics
    • Table 3. Pearson correlation matrix
    • Table 4. Logistic regression results
    • Table 5. Hypothesis testing outcomes based on logistic regression results
    • Conceptualization
      Hien Nguyen Thi Thu, Thi Le Hang Nguyen, Ky Han Tran, Ngoc Tien Nguyen, Hoang Long Nguyen
    • Investigation
      Hien Nguyen Thi Thu, Ky Han Tran, Ngoc Tien Nguyen
    • Methodology
      Hien Nguyen Thi Thu, Thi Le Hang Nguyen, Ngoc Tien Nguyen
    • Project administration
      Hien Nguyen Thi Thu, Thi Le Hang Nguyen, Ngoc Tien Nguyen
    • Resources
      Hien Nguyen Thi Thu, Ngoc Tien Nguyen, Hoang Long Nguyen
    • Supervision
      Hien Nguyen Thi Thu, Thi Le Hang Nguyen, Ngoc Tien Nguyen
    • Validation
      Hien Nguyen Thi Thu, Ngoc Tien Nguyen
    • Visualization
      Hien Nguyen Thi Thu, Ngoc Tien Nguyen
    • Writing – original draft
      Hien Nguyen Thi Thu, Thi Le Hang Nguyen, Ky Han Tran, Ngoc Tien Nguyen
    • Writing – review & editing
      Hien Nguyen Thi Thu, Thi Le Hang Nguyen, Ky Han Tran, Ngoc Tien Nguyen
    • Formal Analysis
      Thi Le Hang Nguyen, Ky Han Tran, Ngoc Tien Nguyen, Hoang Long Nguyen
    • Software
      Thi Le Hang Nguyen, Ngoc Tien Nguyen, Hoang Long Nguyen
    • Data curation
      Ky Han Tran, Ngoc Tien Nguyen, Hoang Long Nguyen