The association between Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure and accounting-based financial performance: a Kuwaiti evidence
- Author(s)
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.16(1).2019.01
-
Article InfoVolume 16 2019, Issue #1, pp. 1-13
- Cited by
- 2417 Views
-
265 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
The current study aims at extending prior accounting research on the association between Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure (CSRD) and Corporate Financial Performance (CFP) using a sample of listed firms on Kuwait Stock Exchange (KSE) from 2011 to 2012. It conducts a regression analysis to investigate the association between CSRD and CFP, as well as investigates the impact of firm size, leverage, and industry affiliation as the key determinants suggested by prior research on the level of CSRD. The results of the present study reveal that both CFP and firm size have significant positive associations with CSRD, whereas, in contrast, firm’s leverage and firm’s industry affiliation show non-significant associations with CSRD.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)M40
-
References50
-
Tables5
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. List of some previous CSRD and CFP studies
- Table 2. Characteristics of the study sample
- Table 3. Descriptive statistics
- Table 4. Correlation matrix of variables
- Table 5. Regression results
-
- Al-Faraih, M., Al-Anezi, F., & Almujamed, H. (2012). The Influence of Institutional and Government Ownership on Firm Performance: Evidence From Kuwait. International Business Research, 5(10), 192-200.
- Alturki, K. (2014). Voluntary Disclosure by Saudi Companies. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 5(20), 77-94.
- Aras, G., Aybars, A., & Kutlu, O. (2010). Managing Corporate Performance: Investigating the Association between Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance in Emerging Markets. International Journal of Productivity and Management, 59(3), 229-254.
- Bani-Khalid, T., Kouhy, R., & Hassan, A. (2017). The Impact of Corporate Characteristics on Social and Environmental Disclosure (CSED): The Case of Jordan. Journal of Accounting and Auditing: Research & Practice.
- Belkaoui, A., & Karpik, P. (1989). Determinants of the Corporate Decision to Disclose Social Information. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 2(1), 36-51.
- Berman, S., Wicks, A., Kotha, S., & Jones, T. (1999). Does Stakeholder Orientation Matter? The Relationship between Stakeholder Management Models and Firm Financial Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 488-506.
- Bowman, E., & Haire, M. (1976). Social Impact Disclosure and Corporate Annual Reports. Accounting, Organizations, and Society, 1(1), 11-21.
- Bujaki, M., Richardson, A. (1997). A Citation Trail Review of the Uses of Firm Size in Accounting Research. Journal of Accounting Literature, 16, 1-27.
- Carroll, A. (2000). A Commentary and an Overview of Key Questions on Corporate Social Performance Measurement. Business and Society, 39, 466-478.
- Chang, Y., Chen, T., & Shu, M. (2018). Corporate Social Responsibility, Corporate Performance, and Pay- Performance Sensitivity – Evidence from Shanghai Stock Exchange Social Responsibility Index. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 54(5), 1183-1203.
- Clarke, J., & Gibson-Sweet, M. (1999). The Use of Corporate Social Disclosures in the Management of Reputation and Legitimacy: A Cross Sectoral Analysis of UK Top 100 Companies. Business Ethics: A European Review, 8(1), 5-13.
- Cormier, D., Magnan, M., & Van Velthoven, B. (2005). Environmental Disclosure Quality in Large German Companies: Economic Incentives, Public Pressures or Institutional Conditions? European Accounting Review, 14(1), 3-39.
- Cowen, S., Ferreri, L., & Parker, L. (1987). The Impact of Corporate Characteristics on Social Responsibility Disclosure: a Typology and Frequency-based Analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 12(2), 111-122.
- Crisóstomo, V., de Souza Freire, F., & de Vasconcellos, F. (2011). Corporate Social Responsibility, Firm Value and Financial Performance in Brazil. Social Responsibility Journal, 7(2), 295-309.
- Dhaliwal, D., Li, O., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. (2011). Voluntary Nonfinancial Disclosure and Cost of Equity Capital: The Initiation of Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting. The Accounting Review, 86(1), 59-100.
- Dye, R., & Sridhar, S. (1995). Industry-Wide Disclosure Dynamics. Journal of Accounting Research, 33(1), 157-174.
- Elias, N., & Epstein, M. (1975). Dimension of Corporate Social Reporting. Management Accounting, 56(9), 36-40.
- Elsbach, K., & Sutton, R. (1992). Acquiring Organizational Legitimacy through Illegitimate Actions: A Marriage of Institutional and Impression Management Theories. Academy of Management Journal, 35(4), 699-738.
- Freeman, R. (1999). Divergent Stakeholder Theory. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 233-236.
- Freeman, R., & Philips, R. (2002). Stakeholder Theory: A Libertarian Defence. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(3), 331-349.
- Gray, R. (2006). Does Sustainability Reporting Improve Corporate Behavior? Wrong Question? Right Time? Accounting and Business Research, 36, 65-88.
- Gray, R., Owen, D., & Adams, C. (1996). Accounting and Accountability. London- Prentice Halls Inc.
- Hackston, D., & Milne, M. (1996). Some Determinants of Social and Environmental Disclosures in New Zealand Companies. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 9(1), 77-108.
- Haniffa, R., & Cooke, T. (2005). The Impact of Culture and Governance on Corporate Social Reporting. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 24(5), 391-430.
- Khan, A., Muttakin, M., & Siddiqui, J. (2013). Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosures: Evidence from an Emerging Economy. Journal of Business Ethics, 114(2), 207-223.
- Khlif, H., & Souissi, M. (2010). The Determinants of Corporate Disclosure: A Meta-analysis. International Journal of Accounting and Information Management, 18(3), 198-219.
- Kok, P., Wiele, T., McKenna, R., & Brown, A. (2001). A Corporate Social Responsibility Audit Within A Quality Management Frame Work. Journal of Business Ethics, 31(4), 285-297.
- Kokubu, K., Tornimasu, K., & Yarnagarni, T. (1994). Green Reporting in Japan: Accountability and Legitimacy, Dundee Discussion Papers in Accountancy and Business Finance. Centre for Social and Environmental Accounting Research, University of Dundee.
- Kotonen, U. (2009). Formal Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting in Finish Listed Companies. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 10(3), 176-207.
- Maignan, I., & Ferrell, O. (2004). Corporate Social Responsibility and Marketing: An Integrative Framework. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science.
- McGuire, J., Sundgren, A., & Schneeweis, T. (1988). Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Financial Performance. Academy of Management, 31(4), 854-872.
- Milne, M. (2002). Positive Accounting Theory, Political Costs and Social Disclosure Analysis: A Critical Look. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 13, 369-395.
- Mousa, G. (2010). Stakeholder Theory as an Arch to Manage Successful Legitimacy Strategies. Int. J. Critical Accounting, 2(4), 399-418.
- Murali, R., & Welch, J. (1989). Agents Owners, Control and Performance. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 16(3), 385-398.
- Murray, A., Sinclair, D., Powel, D., & Gray, R. (2006). Do Financial Markets Care About Social and Environmental Disclosure? Further Evidence and Exploration from the UK. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 19(2), 228-55.
- Muttakin, M., & Khan, A. (2014). Determinants of Corporate Social Disclosure: Empirical Evidence From Bangladesh. Advances in Accounting, 30(1), 168-175.
- Muttakin, M., Khan, A., & Subramaniam, N. (2015). Firm Characteristics, Board Diversity and Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from Bangladesh. Pacific Accounting Review, 27(3), 353-372.
- Neter, J., Wasserman, W., & Kutner, M. (1983). Applied Linear Regression Models. Homewood, Irwin, Illinois.
- Peloza, J., & Papania, L. (2008). The Missing Link between Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance: Stakeholder Salience and Identification. Corporate Reputation Review, 11(2), 169- 181.
- Preston, L., & O’Bannon, D. (1997). The Corporate Social-Financial Performance Association: A Typology and Analysis. Business and Society, 36, 419-429.
- Purushothaman, M., Tower, G., Hancock, R., & Taplin, R. (2000). Determinants of Corporate Social Reporting Practices of Listed Singapore Companies. Pacific Accounting Review, 12(2), 101-133.
- Reverte, C. (2009). Determinants of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure Ratings by Spanish Listed Companies. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(2), 351-366.
- Salzmann, O., Somers, A., & Steger, U. (2005). The Business Case for Corporate Sustainability: Literature Review and Research Options. European Management Journal, 23(1), 27-36.
- Sethi, S. (1976). Issue-Oriented Corporate Advertising: Tax Treatment of Expenditures. California Management Review, 19(1), 5-13.
- Simpson, W., & Kohers, T. (2002). The Link between Corporate Social and Financial Performance: Evidence from the Banking Industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 35(2), 97-109.
- Singhvi, S., & Desai, H. (1971). An Empirical Analysis of the Quality of Corporate Financial Disclosure. The Accounting Review, 46(1), 129- 138.
- Solomon, J. (2010). Corporate Governance and Accountability (3rd ed.). Chichester: Wiley.
- Walden, W., & Schwartz, B. (1997). Environmental Disclosures and Public Policy Pressure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 16, 125-54.
- Wallace, R., Naser, K., & Mora, A. (1994). The Association between the Comprehensiveness of Companies Annual Reports and Firms Characteristics in Spain. Accounting and Business Research, 25(97), 41-53.
- Wu, M. (2006). Corporate Social Performance, Corporate Financial Performance, and Firm Size: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of American Academy of Business, 8(1), 163-171.
-
The relationship between corporate social responsibility and earnings management: accounting for endogeneity
Hyunjung Choi , Byungchul Choi
,
Jungyoon Byun
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.15(4).2018.06
Investment Management and Financial Innovations Volume 15, 2018 Issue #4 pp. 69-84 Views: 4622 Downloads: 545 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯThis study examines the relationship between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and earnings management after controlling for endogeneity of CSR. Using a sample of non-financial firms listed on Korean Securities Market between 2002 and 2010, this study finds that ignoring endogeneity biases the estimated relation between CSR and earnings management. Specifically, the results show that the negative and significant relation between CSR commitment and discretionary accruals reported in the previous studies becomes insignificant. However, the negative and significant relation between CSR commitment and real activities manipulation remains significant even when the endogeneity of CSR commitment is taken into account. Therefore, this study provides evidence that proactive CSR engagement significantly affects firm’s practice of real activities manipulation, while it does not affect its practice of discretionary accruals. These results indicate that CSR commitment leads managers to be more responsible in management of operational activities than in accruals management.
-
Does board composition have an impact on CSR reporting?
Patrick Velte 
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.15(2).2017.02
Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 15, 2017 Issue #2 pp. 19-35 Views: 4473 Downloads: 1719 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯCorporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting plays a key role in management control, particularly in light of the increased demand for non-financial reporting after the financial crisis of 2008–2009. This literature review evaluates 47 empirical studies that concentrate on the influence of several board composition variables on the quantity and quality of CSR reporting. The author briefly introduces the research framework that underpins current empirical studies in this field. This is followed by a discussion of the main variables of board composition: (1) committees (audit and CSR committees), (2) board independence, (3) board expertise, (4) CEO duality, (5) board diversity (gender and foreign diversity), (6) board activity, and (7) board size. The author, then, summarizes the key findings, discusses the limitations of the existing research and offers useful recommendations for researchers, firm practice and regulators.
-
From the corporate social responsibility reporting to the integrated reporting: the case of Sabaf S.p.a
Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 15, 2017 Issue #1 (cont.) pp. 150-157 Views: 2533 Downloads: 1044 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯIn December 2013, the International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC) published the International Integrated Reporting Framework.
The aim of the Framework is to provide the guiding principles and the content elements of an integrated report. The integrated report constitutes an evolutionary step in the corporate’s financial and non-financial communication, moving from the social responsibility reporting to the integrated reporting.
This practice is at the beginning in Europe and especially in Italy, where only a few listed companies have decided to face the multitude of challenges the integrated report implies.
Considering the relevance of such a new form of communication, the paper examines the main steps carried out by an Italian listed company moving towards the integrated report. The research has been conducted by adopting a qualitative case study approach, by focusing on Sabaf S.p.a, an Italian listed medium sized company belonging to the Star Segment. This company has been selected, because it was one of the first adopters of the integrated report among the Italian listed companies.
The study is built on data gathered through sites visits, structured interviews and company materials.
The paper examines Sabaf’s transition from the corporate social responsibility report to the integrated report, aiming at answering the following research question:
Why has Sabaf moved to integrated reporting? Which are Sabaf’s main steps towars the integrated report? How is the Sabaf’s integrated reporting process going?
The findings should be of interest to a number of parties including standard setters, firms, financial advisors, auditors and users of non-financial statements.
