Mohamad Saad

Type of the article: Research Article

Abstract
This study examines the relationship between governance quality, leverage, and firm performance and financial distress in Jordanian industrial companies listed on the Amman Stock Exchange (ASE). The industrial sector was chosen for this study due to its capital-intensive nature, reliance on external funding, and ongoing operational and market challenges in Jordan. The sample consists of 474 observations from 2014 to 2022. The quality of governance is represented by board size and board independence, leverage is represented by the debt-to-assets ratio, and firm performance is represented by gross margin. For financial distress, the integrated logit model indicates that board size is not statistically significant (coefficient = 0.078, p = 0.361), and the board independence is also not statistically significant (coefficient = 2.341, p = 0.076). Leverage, on the other hand, has a positive and significant association with financial distress (coefficient = 3.560, p = 0.001), while gross margin is negatively and significantly associated with financial distress (coefficient = –9.614, p < 0.001). The results suggest that financial distress for Jordanian industrial firms is primarily attributed to financing pressure and operating performance, and that the governance proxies used in this study do not adequately explain financial distress.

Acknowledgment
This research was funded through the annual funding track by the Deanship of Scientific Research, from the vice presidency for graduate studies and scientific research, King Faisal University, Saudi Arabia [Grant No. KFU263483].

Type of the article: Research Article

Abstract
Cash flow volatility is an important source of financial uncertainty because unstable operating cash flows may weaken firms’ ability to meet obligations, sustain investment, and preserve financial flexibility. This issue is particularly relevant in emerging markets, where firms often face financing constraints and sectoral structure may shape financial stability differently. This study examines the relationship between cash flow volatility and financial stability in Jordanian listed firms and investigates whether the insurance sector responds differently to operating cash flow uncertainty compared with other non-financial firms. Financial stability is measured using the Z-score, while cash flow volatility is calculated as the rolling standard deviation of operating cash flow scaled by average total assets. The analysis uses panel data for Jordanian listed firms over 2014–2024. A three-year rolling window is applied in the baseline model, while a five-year rolling window is used as a robustness check. The regression model includes an interaction term between cash flow volatility and an insurance-sector dummy, along with firm size, leverage, firm age, and sales growth as control variables. The results indicate statistically weak evidence that the Z-score is negatively associated with cash flow volatility, albeit in a directionally weak one. But this is not statistically significant in the baseline fixed-effects model. Furthermore, the interaction between cash flow volatility and the insurance sector dummy is not statistically significant and has a different sign in one robustness specification. The study therefore does not confirm that insurance firms are structurally less sensitive to cash flow volatility. Leverage remains the most robust determinant of lower financial stability.

Acknowledgment
This research was funded through the annual funding track by the Deanship of Scientific Research, from the vice presidency for graduate studies and scientific research, King Faisal University, Saudi Arabia [Grant No. KFU263523].