Audit firm attributes and financial performance: Traditional vs market-based measures in listed Nigerian manufacturing firms

  • 91 Views
  • 15 Downloads

Creative Commons License DMCA.com Protection Status
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Type of the article: Research Article

A comparative assessment of how audit firms’ attributes affect financial performance using both market-based and traditional metrics remains limited in emerging markets. Hence, the study evaluated the comparative effect of audit firms’ attributes on financial performance measured by market-based and traditional metrics. Secondary data from thirty-five manufacturing companies listed at the Nigerian Exchange Group from 2012 to 2022 were analyzed. These companies are purposively selected from a population of fifty-six. Descriptive statistics and panel data regression analysis were used in the data analysis. Results indicate that audit firm resource availability has a significant positive effect on earnings per share (β = 2.1550; p ≤ 0.05), while other proxies of audit firm attributes do not have a significant effect when traditional metrics of financial performance (i.e., earnings per share and share price) were used. However, when market-based metrics of financial performance (market value added and economic value added) are used, audit firm resources availability has a positive significant effect on both market value added (β = 3.842; p ≤ 0.05) and economic value added (β = 0.1789; p ≤ 0.05). The study concluded that audit size, tenure, and industry specialization do not influence firm financial performance, but audit resource availability does. Besides, using market-based financial performance metrics yields more consistent results than traditional metrics.

view full abstract hide full abstract
    • Table 1. Measurement of variables
    • Table 2. Descriptive statistics
    • Table 3. Correlation matrix
    • Table 4. Regression results (dependent variable: Earnings per Share)
    • Table 5. Regression results (dependent variable: Share Price)
    • Table 6. Regression results (dependent variable: Economic Value Added)
    • Table 7. Regression results (dependent variable: Market Value Added)
    • Table 8. Comparison of regression results of audit firm attributes on traditional and modern metrics of financial performance
    • Table A1. List of manufacturing companies selected according to their sector
    • Table A2. List of selected samples
    • Conceptualization
      Olusola Kikelomo Akinlawon
    • Formal Analysis
      Olusola Kikelomo Akinlawon, Temitope Mariam Worimegbe, Babatunde Moses Ololade, Taofeek Sola Afolabi
    • Investigation
      Olusola Kikelomo Akinlawon, Temitope Mariam Worimegbe, Babatunde Moses Ololade
    • Methodology
      Olusola Kikelomo Akinlawon, Babatunde Moses Ololade, Taofeek Sola Afolabi
    • Resources
      Olusola Kikelomo Akinlawon
    • Writing – original draft
      Olusola Kikelomo Akinlawon
    • Data curation
      Temitope Mariam Worimegbe, Babatunde Moses Ololade
    • Project administration
      Temitope Mariam Worimegbe, Taofeek Sola Afolabi
    • Supervision
      Temitope Mariam Worimegbe, Babatunde Moses Ololade
    • Validation
      Temitope Mariam Worimegbe, Taofeek Sola Afolabi
    • Writing – review & editing
      Temitope Mariam Worimegbe, Babatunde Moses Ololade, Taofeek Sola Afolabi
    • Visualization
      Taofeek Sola Afolabi